The Motorola One Macro and Nokia 7.2 represent compelling options in the mid-range smartphone space, but cater to different priorities. The Motorola prioritizes exceptional battery life, while the Nokia 7.2 focuses on a brighter, more vibrant display and a slightly more powerful chipset. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you choose the right device.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing all-day (and then some) battery life, the Motorola One Macro is the clear winner, boasting an endurance rating 41 hours higher than the Nokia 7.2. However, the Nokia 7.2 offers a significantly brighter display and a marginally faster processor, making it suitable for media consumption and light multitasking.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 - ROW |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 19, 20, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - ROW |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 300/50 Mbps or LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 - IN |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, October 09. Released 2019, October 12 | 2019, September 05. Released 2019, September 23 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), glass back (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 157.6 x 75.4 x 9 mm (6.20 x 2.97 x 0.35 in) | 159.9 x 75.2 x 8.3 mm (6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 180 g (6.35 oz) |
| | Water-repellent coating | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1520 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 1080 x 2280 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.2 inches, 96.7 cm2 (~81.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.3 inches, 99.1 cm2 (~82.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, HDR10 |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6771 Helio P70 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SDM660 Snapdragon 660 (14 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 | Adreno 512 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 10 | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 11, Android One |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Laser AF, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Zeiss optics, LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | 13 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30/60/120fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS) |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | Zeiss optics, HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.2, 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 20 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3", 0.9µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, EDR, LE, aptX |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | No | Yes (excl. India) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 10W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 3500 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Space Blue | Cyan Green, Charcoal, Ice |
| Models | PAGS0005IN | TA-1193, TA-1178, TA-1196, TA-1181 |
| Price | About 240 EUR | About 240 EUR |
| SAR | 0.54 W/kg (head) 1.33 W/kg (body) | 1.15 W/kg (head) 0.90 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 0.62 W/kg (head) 1.06 W/kg (body) | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.44 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality |
Noise -92.1dB / Crosstalk -91.0dB |
Noise -93.0dB / Crosstalk -93.4dB |
| Battery life | Endurance rating 110h |
Endurance rating 69h
|
| Camera |
Photo / Video |
Photo / Video |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: 1733:1 (nominal) |
Contrast ratio: 1342:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker |
Voice 71dB / Noise 72dB / Ring 80dB |
-29.6 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 139869 (v7), 159405 (v8)
GeekBench: 5763 (v4.4)
GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
AnTuTu: 139495 (v7), 164484 (v8)
GeekBench: 5440 (v4.4), 1398 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 8.1fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Motorola One Macro
- Exceptional battery life (110h endurance)
- Higher contrast ratio for potentially better indoor viewing
- More power-efficient chipset (12nm process)
- Lower display brightness compared to Nokia 7.2
- Potentially slower processor performance
Nokia 7.2
- Brighter display for better outdoor visibility
- Slightly faster processor for smoother multitasking
- Potentially more versatile camera system
- Significantly shorter battery life (69h endurance)
- Lower contrast ratio
Display Comparison
The Nokia 7.2 boasts a brighter display, reaching 585 nits compared to the Motorola One Macro’s 442 nits. This translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. However, the Motorola compensates with a higher contrast ratio of 1733:1 versus the Nokia’s 1342:1, potentially offering deeper blacks and a more punchy image indoors. Both displays utilize a nominal contrast ratio, suggesting they aren't employing advanced technologies like local dimming. The Nokia’s higher brightness is a clear advantage for outdoor usability, while the Motorola’s contrast ratio may appeal to those who consume a lot of video content in darker environments.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature a 'Photo / Video' camera setup, but the provided data lacks specifics. Given the market positioning, it's safe to assume both utilize multi-camera systems, but without sensor size or aperture information, a detailed comparison is impossible. The Motorola One Macro’s name suggests a focus on macro photography, potentially featuring a dedicated macro lens. However, without knowing the sensor resolution or quality, it’s difficult to assess its effectiveness. The Nokia 7.2 likely prioritizes overall image quality and versatility, potentially offering a wider range of shooting modes.
Performance
The Nokia 7.2 is equipped with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (14nm), while the Motorola One Macro features the MediaTek Helio P70 (12nm). While the Snapdragon 660 has a slightly higher peak CPU clock speed (2.2 GHz vs 2.0 GHz), the Helio P70’s smaller 12nm process node *should* offer better power efficiency. However, the Snapdragon 660’s architecture (Kryo 260 Gold & Silver) is generally considered more efficient than the Cortex-A73/A53 combination in the Helio P70. Real-world performance differences will likely be subtle, with the Nokia 7.2 feeling slightly snappier in app loading and multitasking, but the Motorola benefiting from the more efficient node in sustained workloads.
Battery Life
The Motorola One Macro’s endurance rating of 110 hours is a significant advantage over the Nokia 7.2’s 69 hours. This 41-hour difference translates to nearly a full extra day of use on a single charge. Both phones support 10W wired charging, meaning charging speeds will be relatively slow – expect several hours to fully charge from 0 to 100%. The Motorola’s superior endurance is the defining characteristic, making it ideal for users who frequently travel or have limited access to power outlets.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola One Macro if you need a phone that can reliably last through two full days of moderate use, and aren't overly concerned with having the brightest screen or fastest processor. Buy the Nokia 7.2 if you prefer a more visually appealing display for streaming videos and browsing, and value a slightly smoother experience for everyday tasks, accepting the trade-off of significantly reduced battery endurance.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Motorola One Macro's battery life truly that much better in real-world use?
Yes, the 110-hour endurance rating is a significant indicator. This means, with moderate usage (calls, texts, some social media, and light browsing), you can realistically expect the Motorola One Macro to last nearly two full days on a single charge, a substantial improvement over the Nokia 7.2's single-day battery life.
❓ Will I notice a significant performance difference between the Snapdragon 660 and Helio P70 in everyday tasks?
The performance difference will likely be subtle. The Snapdragon 660 has a slight edge in raw processing power, but the Helio P70’s efficiency could mitigate this in sustained use. You might notice slightly faster app loading times on the Nokia 7.2, but both phones should handle typical tasks like browsing, social media, and messaging without issue.
❓ Does the Nokia 7.2's brighter screen make a big difference for watching videos?
Absolutely. The 585 nits of brightness on the Nokia 7.2 makes it much more enjoyable to watch videos outdoors or in brightly lit environments. The Motorola One Macro’s 442 nits will appear washed out in comparison under similar conditions.
