The Motorola One Hyper and Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro represent compelling options in the mid-range smartphone market, but cater to different priorities. The One Hyper aimed for rapid charging and a clean software experience, while the Mi 9T Pro brought flagship-level processing power to a more accessible price point. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you choose the right device.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 855 chipset delivers significantly faster performance, making it ideal for gaming and demanding applications. While both phones offer 27W charging and similar battery endurance ratings, the Mi 9T Pro’s processing advantage outweighs the One Hyper’s charging speed variations.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 28, 66 - USA | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, December 04. Released 2020, January 22 | 2019, August 21. Released 2019, August 21 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 161.8 x 76.6 x 8.9 mm (6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 in) | 156.7 x 74.3 x 8.8 mm (6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 210 g (7.41 oz) | 191 g (6.74 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~396 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 103.7 cm2 (~83.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.39 inches, 100.2 cm2 (~86.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED, HDR |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 460 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM675 Snapdragon 675 (11 nm) | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 612 | Adreno 640 |
| OS | Android 10, upgradable to Android 11 | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 11, MIUI 12.5 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.0 | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | - |
| Features | Laser AF, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.4, 53mm (telephoto), 1/4.0", 1.12µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom
13 MP, f/2.4, 12mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/120/240fps, 1080p@960fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | Motorized pop-up 32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 0.8µm | Motorized pop-up 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio
|
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, EDR | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a) |
| Radio | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 27W wired (Europe)
45W wired (USA) | 27W wired, QC4 |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Fresh Orchid, Deepsea Blue, Dark Amber | Carbon black, Red flame, Glacier blue |
| Models | XT2027, XT2027-1 | M1903F11G |
| Price | About 540 EUR | About 150 EUR |
| SAR | 1.01 W/kg (head) 1.40 W/kg (body) | 1.03 W/kg (head) 0.72 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 0.59 W/kg (head) 0.88 W/kg (body) | 1.30 W/kg (head) 1.51 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality | - |
Noise -93.9dB / Crosstalk -94.2dB |
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 103h |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.9 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 368846 (v7), 437823 (v8)
GeekBench: 10684 (v4.4), 2732 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 36fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Motorola One Hyper
- Potentially faster 45W charging (US model)
- Near-stock Android experience
- Competitive price point
- Significantly weaker Snapdragon 675 processor
- Likely inferior camera performance
- Missing detailed display specifications
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
- Powerful Snapdragon 855 processor
- Superior gaming performance
- Likely better camera image quality
- MIUI software may not appeal to all users
- 27W charging is standard, not leading-edge
- Potential for software bloatware
Display Comparison
Both the Motorola One Hyper and Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro boast displays with an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting deep blacks typical of AMOLED panels. However, detailed specifications like peak brightness and color gamut coverage are missing. Given Xiaomi’s history with vibrant displays, the Mi 9T Pro likely offers a more visually striking experience. The absence of high refresh rate technology on either device is notable, placing them behind newer mid-range contenders.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs beyond the presence of sensors, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the Mi 9T Pro, being positioned as a more premium device, likely features a more capable main sensor and image processing pipeline. The Snapdragon 855’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) is also more advanced than the 675’s, enabling better noise reduction and dynamic range. The inclusion of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on the Mi 9T Pro would further enhance image quality, particularly in low-light conditions. The 2MP macro cameras often found on both devices offer limited practical benefit.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro’s Snapdragon 855 (7nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Motorola One Hyper’s Snapdragon 675 (11nm). The 855 features a Kryo 485 CPU with a prime core clocked at 2.84 GHz, compared to the 675’s 2.0 GHz Kryo 460 Gold core. This translates to a significant performance advantage for the Mi 9T Pro in CPU-intensive tasks and gaming. The 7nm process node of the 855 also contributes to better thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during sustained workloads. While both phones likely shipped with adequate RAM, the Mi 9T Pro’s superior chipset will benefit more from faster RAM speeds (LPDDR4X likely on both).
Battery Life
Both devices share an endurance rating of 103 hours, suggesting comparable real-world battery life despite potential differences in battery capacity (not specified). Both support 27W wired charging, with the Motorola One Hyper offering a 45W option in the US market. This faster charging could provide a quicker top-up, but the overall impact on daily usage is mitigated by the similar endurance ratings. The Mi 9T Pro also supports Quick Charge 4 (QC4), potentially offering wider compatibility with fast chargers.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola One Hyper if you prioritize a potentially faster 45W charging experience (US model only) and prefer a near-stock Android experience. Buy the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro if you demand the best possible performance for gaming, multitasking, and future-proofing, and are comfortable with Xiaomi’s MIUI software.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 675 in the Motorola One Hyper struggle with demanding games like PUBG or Genshin Impact?
Yes, the Snapdragon 675 is a mid-range chipset and will likely struggle to deliver a smooth experience in graphically intensive games like PUBG or Genshin Impact at higher settings. You’ll likely need to lower graphics settings and resolution to achieve playable frame rates. The Mi 9T Pro’s Snapdragon 855 is far better equipped for these titles.
❓ Does the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro experience significant throttling during extended gaming sessions?
While the Snapdragon 855 can generate heat, the Mi 9T Pro’s thermal management system is generally adequate. Some throttling may occur during prolonged, demanding gaming sessions, but it’s unlikely to be severe enough to render the phone unusable. The 7nm process node of the 855 helps mitigate heat buildup compared to the 11nm Snapdragon 675.
❓ Is the 45W charging on the US version of the Motorola One Hyper a game-changer?
While 45W charging is faster than the standard 27W, the difference in real-world charging time isn’t massive. It will reduce charging times, but the Mi 9T Pro’s comparable endurance rating means you won’t be significantly disadvantaged by sticking with 27W.
