The Motorola One Hyper and Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW represent distinct approaches to the mid-range 5G market. The One Hyper, particularly in the US, prioritized incredibly fast 45W charging, while the A71 5G UW leverages the more advanced Snapdragon 765G chipset and Samsung’s established brand recognition. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device offers the best overall experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance and future-proofing, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is the better choice. Its Snapdragon 765G offers a noticeable performance uplift over the One Hyper’s Snapdragon 675, and while charging isn’t as rapid, the overall package delivers a smoother, more capable experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 28, 66 - USA | 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 13, 20, 28, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 260, 261 SA/NSA/mmWave |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, December 04. Released 2020, January 22 | 2020, July 07 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2020, July 16 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 161.8 x 76.6 x 8.9 mm (6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 in) | 162.8 x 75.7 x 8.4 mm (6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM (pre-installed) |
| Weight | 210 g (7.41 oz) | 188 g (6.63 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~396 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 103.7 cm2 (~83.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~87.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 460 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM675 Snapdragon 675 (11 nm) | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 612 | Adreno 620 |
| OS | Android 10, upgradable to Android 11 | Android 10, One UI 2.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.0 | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | - |
| Features | Laser AF, LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF
12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide)
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/240fps, 1080p@960fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | Motorized pop-up 32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, EDR | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| | - | ANT+ |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 27W wired (Europe)
45W wired (USA) | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Fresh Orchid, Deepsea Blue, Dark Amber | Prism Bricks Black |
| Models | XT2027, XT2027-1 | SM-A716V |
| Price | About 540 EUR | - |
| SAR | 1.01 W/kg (head) 1.40 W/kg (body) | 0.50 W/kg (head) 0.78 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 0.59 W/kg (head) 0.88 W/kg (body) | - |
Motorola One Hyper
- Incredibly fast 45W charging (US model)
- Potentially lower price point
- Clean Android experience (typically)
- Less powerful Snapdragon 675 chipset
- Potentially inferior camera processing
- May lack 5G connectivity in some regions
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW
- More powerful Snapdragon 765G chipset
- 5G connectivity
- Superior image processing capabilities
- Slower 25W charging
- Samsung’s One UI can be resource-intensive
- Potentially higher price
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a particularly standout display. Both likely utilize LCD panels, common in this price bracket. However, the A71 5G UW benefits from the more modern Snapdragon 765G’s image signal processor (ISP), potentially leading to slightly better color reproduction and dynamic range in displayed images. While specific nit brightness figures aren’t provided, Samsung’s displays generally exhibit good outdoor visibility, a potential advantage over the One Hyper.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the Snapdragon 765G’s superior ISP in the A71 5G UW provides a computational photography advantage. This means better image processing, improved low-light performance, and potentially more accurate color rendition. The A71 5G UW is likely to offer more sophisticated camera features and potentially better video recording capabilities. The One Hyper’s camera performance will likely be adequate, but won’t match the processing power of the Samsung.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW’s Snapdragon 765G (7nm) is a significant step up from the Motorola One Hyper’s Snapdragon 675 (11nm). The 7nm process node inherently offers better power efficiency and thermal performance, allowing the 765G to sustain higher clock speeds for longer. The 765G’s CPU configuration – 1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime, 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold, and 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver – provides a more robust single-core and multi-core performance compared to the One Hyper’s 2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 460 Silver. This translates to snappier app launches, smoother multitasking, and a more enjoyable gaming experience on the A71 5G UW.
Battery Life
The Motorola One Hyper’s 45W (US) charging is its standout feature, promising significantly faster top-ups than the A71 5G UW’s 25W charging. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging speed could offset a potentially smaller battery in the One Hyper. However, the Snapdragon 765G’s improved power efficiency in the A71 5G UW could result in comparable or even better real-world battery life, despite the slower charging. The A71 5G UW’s 5G connectivity will also impact battery drain, but the more efficient chipset mitigates this concern.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola One Hyper if you absolutely prioritize the fastest possible charging speeds and are comfortable with a slightly less powerful processor. This phone is ideal for users who frequently find themselves needing to top up their battery quickly. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW if you value a more balanced experience with better overall performance, 5G connectivity, and a more refined software experience, even if it means sacrificing some charging speed.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 765G in the A71 5G UW handle demanding games like PUBG or Call of Duty Mobile smoothly?
Yes, the Snapdragon 765G is capable of running PUBG and Call of Duty Mobile at high settings with stable frame rates. While it won’t match the performance of flagship chipsets, it provides a significantly better gaming experience than the Snapdragon 675 in the One Hyper, thanks to its more powerful GPU and efficient thermal management.
❓ How much faster is the 45W charging on the Motorola One Hyper compared to the 25W charging on the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW?
The 45W charging on the One Hyper can potentially charge the phone from 0% to 100% in around 60-75 minutes, while the A71 5G UW’s 25W charging will likely take closer to 90-120 minutes. This difference is particularly noticeable for quick top-ups – a 30-minute charge on the One Hyper will provide significantly more battery life than the same on the A71 5G UW.
❓ Does the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW support sub-6GHz 5G, and what speeds can I expect?
Yes, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is designed to work with T-Mobile’s sub-6GHz 5G network. Actual speeds will vary depending on network congestion and your location, but users can generally expect download speeds between 100Mbps and 400Mbps in areas with good 5G coverage.
