Motorola One Hyper vs Realme X2 Pro: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing battery life and a smooth experience, the Realme X2 Pro is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 855+ chipset delivers significantly more processing power, coupled with blazing-fast 50W charging. While the One Hyper offers respectable performance, it can't match the X2 Pro's overall speed and responsiveness.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola One Hyper | Realme X2 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - China |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 28, 66 - USA | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - China |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - EMEA | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2019, December 04. Released 2020, January 22 | 2019, October 15. Released 2019, October |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 161.8 x 76.6 x 8.9 mm (6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 in) | 161 x 75.7 x 8.7 mm (6.34 x 2.98 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 210 g (7.41 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~396 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 103.7 cm2 (~83.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 103.5 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 460 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.96 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 485) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM675 Snapdragon 675 (11 nm) | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855+ (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 612 | Adreno 640 (700 MHz) |
| OS | Android 10, upgradable to Android 11 | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 11, Realme UI 2.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 2.0 | 64GB UFS 2.1, 128/256GB UFS 3.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | - |
| Features | Laser AF, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF 13 MP, f/2.5, 52mm (telephoto), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm (ultrawide) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | Motorized pop-up 32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with Dolby Atmos stereo speakers (2 dedicated amplifiers) |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio (incl. speakers) | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, EDR | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 27W wired (Europe) 45W wired (USA) | 50W wired, 100% in 35 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable | 4000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Fresh Orchid, Deepsea Blue, Dark Amber | Lunar White, Neptune Blue, Red Master Edition, Gray Master Edition |
| Models | XT2027, XT2027-1 | RMX1931 |
| Price | About 540 EUR | About 440 EUR |
| SAR | 1.01 W/kg (head) 1.40 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | 0.59 W/kg (head) 0.88 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Audio quality | - | Noise -91.3dB / Crosstalk -92.5dB |
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 94h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | Voice 82dB / Noise 75dB / Ring 91dB |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 396827 (v7), 467653 (v8) GeekBench: 10373 (v4.4) GFXBench: 37fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Motorola One Hyper
- Potentially more affordable price point
- Decent performance for everyday tasks
- 45W charging available in the US
- Significantly weaker chipset compared to the X2 Pro
- Likely less capable camera system
- May struggle with demanding games
Realme X2 Pro
- Powerful Snapdragon 855+ chipset
- Blazing-fast 50W SuperVOOC charging
- Superior gaming performance
- Potentially higher price
- May experience more heat under heavy load (though the 7nm process helps)
- Software experience can be divisive (ColorOS)
Display Comparison
Both devices share an 'infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting both utilize AMOLED panels, but specific details like peak brightness and color gamut coverage are missing. The Realme X2 Pro’s focus on a high refresh rate (often found in X2 Pro variants) would be a significant advantage for smoother scrolling and gaming, a feature absent from the One Hyper’s specifications. Without further data, it’s difficult to assess display quality beyond the panel type.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific sensor details. However, the X2 Pro’s positioning as a performance-focused device suggests a more sophisticated camera system. While the One Hyper likely offers a competent camera for everyday use, the X2 Pro likely benefits from a larger sensor and more advanced image processing algorithms, leveraging the power of the Snapdragon 855+’s ISP. The absence of details on OIS or aperture sizes makes a precise comparison impossible, but the X2 Pro likely excels in low-light photography.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Realme X2 Pro’s Snapdragon 855+ (7nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Motorola One Hyper’s Snapdragon 675 (11nm). The 855+ features a Kryo 485 core clocked at 2.96 GHz, compared to the 675’s 2.0 GHz Kryo 460 Gold core. This translates to a significant performance boost in CPU-intensive tasks and a more capable GPU for gaming. The 7nm process node of the 855+ also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of throttling during sustained workloads. The X2 Pro is demonstrably faster.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 94 hours, suggesting similar real-world battery life despite the differing chipsets. However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The Motorola One Hyper offers 27W charging in Europe and 45W in the US, while the Realme X2 Pro boasts 50W SuperVOOC charging, capable of a full charge in just 35 minutes. This charging speed advantage is a major selling point for the X2 Pro, significantly reducing downtime.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola One Hyper if you need a reliable daily driver with decent performance for everyday tasks and appreciate the potential for 45W charging in the US market. Buy the Realme X2 Pro if you prioritize gaming, demanding applications, and the fastest possible charging speeds – it’s the better choice for power users and those who value future-proofing.