The Motorola One Fusion+ and Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro represent compelling options in the competitive mid-range smartphone market. While both aim to deliver a balanced experience, they take distinctly different approaches. The Fusion+ prioritizes a refined, all-around experience, while the Poco X3 Pro aggressively targets performance, particularly for gaming, at a very competitive price point. This comparison will dissect their key differences to help you determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and fast charging, the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 860 chipset offers a significant performance leap over the Fusion+'s Snapdragon 730, and the 33W charging dramatically reduces downtime. However, the Fusion+ offers a slightly better display contrast ratio and potentially longer endurance.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 International | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 19, 20, 38, 40, 41 - Europe, India | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - APEM | 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, June 08. Released 2020, June 08 | 2021, March 22 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, March 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), plastic back |
| Dimensions | 162.9 x 76.4 x 9.6 mm (6.41 x 3.01 x 0.38 in) | 165.3 x 76.8 x 9.4 mm (6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 210 g (7.41 oz) | 215 g (7.58 oz) |
| | Water-repellent coating | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~396 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 103.7 cm2 (~83.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, HDR10 | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 2404Hz PWM, HDR10, 450 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 470 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 470 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.96 GHz Kryo 485 Gold & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 Gold & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM730 Snapdragon 730 (8 nm) - EuropeQualcomm SDM730 Snapdragon 730G (8 nm) - India | Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Adreno 640 |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1.0µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 1080p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | Motorized pop-up 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio (market/region dependent) | FM radio, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | 33W wired, 59% in 30 min, 100% in 59 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5160 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Moonlight White, Twilight Blue | Phantom Black, Frost Blue, Metal Bronze |
| Models | PAKF0002IN | M2102J20SG, M2102J20SI |
| Price | About 300 EUR | $ 128.04 / £ 249.99 |
| SAR | 0.52 W/kg (head) 1.43 W/kg (body) | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.57 W/kg (head) 0.90 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 136h
|
Endurance rating 112h
|
| Camera |
Photo / Video |
Photo / Video |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: 1423:1 (nominal) |
Contrast ratio: 1401:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker |
-27.9 LUFS (Good)
|
-26.1 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 267980 (v8)
GeekBench: 1705 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 14fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
AnTuTu: 453223 (v8)
GeekBench: 2574 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 38fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Motorola One Fusion+
- Potentially longer battery life (136h endurance)
- Slightly higher peak display brightness (562 nits)
- Refined, all-around user experience
- Significantly weaker processor (Snapdragon 730)
- Slow 15W charging
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
- Much faster processor (Snapdragon 860)
- 33W fast charging (full charge in under an hour)
- Likely 120Hz display for smoother visuals
- Shorter battery life (112h endurance)
- Potentially less refined software experience
Display Comparison
Both the Motorola One Fusion+ and Poco X3 Pro feature displays with a nominal contrast ratio of around 1400:1, indicating similar levels of black depth and color vibrancy. However, the Fusion+ boasts a measured peak brightness of 562 nits, which will provide a slightly more visible experience in direct sunlight. While both use LCD panels, the lack of high refresh rate information for the Fusion+ puts it at a disadvantage compared to the likely 120Hz panel on the Poco X3 Pro (based on market positioning). This higher refresh rate on the Poco X3 Pro translates to smoother scrolling and animations, enhancing the overall user experience.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer a 'Photo / Video' camera experience, but specifics are limited. Without detailed sensor information, it's difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, given the Poco X3 Pro's focus on value, it's likely to offer a more competitive camera setup for the price. The Motorola One Fusion+ may lean towards more natural image processing, while the Poco X3 Pro might prioritize vibrant, social media-ready photos. The absence of details regarding OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on either device suggests reliance on software stabilization.
Performance
The core difference between these two phones lies in their chipsets. The Poco X3 Pro is equipped with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (7nm), a processor typically found in higher-end devices. Its octa-core configuration, featuring a 2.96 GHz Kryo 485 Gold prime core, delivers significantly more processing power than the Motorola One Fusion+'s Snapdragon 730 (8nm). The 730G variant in India further narrows the performance gap. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive gaming experience on the Poco X3 Pro. The Snapdragon 860's Adreno 640 GPU also provides a substantial graphics boost. While both phones likely feature similar RAM configurations, the superior chipset in the Poco X3 Pro is the dominant factor.
Battery Life
The Motorola One Fusion+ claims an endurance rating of 136 hours, while the Poco X3 Pro manages 112 hours. This suggests the Fusion+ offers better overall battery life, likely due to the more efficient Snapdragon 730 and potentially optimized software. However, the Poco X3 Pro compensates with significantly faster charging – 33W wired, achieving 59% charge in 30 minutes and 100% in under an hour. The Fusion+'s 15W charging is considerably slower, requiring much longer to fully replenish the battery. This faster charging capability on the Poco X3 Pro effectively mitigates the slightly lower endurance rating for many users.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola One Fusion+ if you value a balanced experience with a slightly more refined display and potentially longer battery life between charges, and aren't heavily focused on demanding gaming. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro if you prioritize gaming performance, fast charging, and getting the most processing power for your money, even if it means sacrificing some battery endurance.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Poco X3 Pro's Snapdragon 860 overheat during extended gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 860 is known for its excellent thermal efficiency. While it's a powerful chip, it's built on a 7nm process, which helps manage heat. However, sustained gaming will inevitably generate heat. The Poco X3 Pro's thermal design (which isn't detailed in our data) will be crucial. User reports suggest it handles most games well, but prolonged, high-graphics settings may lead to some throttling.
❓ Is the 15W charging on the Motorola One Fusion+ realistically usable in 2024?
15W charging is significantly slower than the 33W offered by the Poco X3 Pro. While it will still charge the phone overnight, it's inconvenient for quick top-ups. Expect a full charge to take well over two hours. In a market increasingly dominated by fast charging, the Fusion+'s charging speed feels dated.
❓ Does the Poco X3 Pro support high refresh rate gaming?
While not explicitly stated, the Poco X3 Pro is widely believed to feature a 120Hz display. This, combined with the Snapdragon 860's powerful GPU, should allow for smooth gameplay at higher frame rates in many popular titles. However, achieving consistently high frame rates will depend on the game's optimization and graphics settings.
