Motorola One Fusion+ vs Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range 5G Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G emerges as the superior choice. Its more modern Snapdragon 778G chipset, coupled with faster 25W charging, provides a noticeable performance and convenience advantage. While the Motorola One Fusion+ boasts impressive battery endurance, the A52s 5G’s overall package is more compelling.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola One Fusion+ | Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 International | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 19, 20, 38, 40, 41 - Europe, India | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - APEM | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, June 08. Released 2020, June 08 | 2021, August 17 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, September 01 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back |
| Dimensions | 162.9 x 76.4 x 9.6 mm (6.41 x 3.01 x 0.38 in) | 159.9 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 210 g (7.41 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| Water-repellent coating | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~396 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 103.7 cm2 (~83.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, HDR10 | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 470 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 470 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM730 Snapdragon 730 (8 nm) - EuropeQualcomm SDM730 Snapdragon 730G (8 nm) - India | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | Motorized pop-up 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio (market/region dependent) | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual Proximity Sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Moonlight White, Twilight Blue | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Purple, Awesome Mint |
| Models | PAKF0002IN | SM-A528B, SM-A528B/DS, SM-A528N |
| Price | About 300 EUR | £ 112.98 / € 249.47 |
| SAR | 0.52 W/kg (head) 1.43 W/kg (body) | 0.72 W/kg (head) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.88 W/kg (head) 0.84 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 136h | Endurance rating 113h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: 1423:1 (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -27.9 LUFS (Good) | -27.5 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 267980 (v8) GeekBench: 1705 (v5.1) GFXBench: 14fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 429675 (v8), 506432(v9) GeekBench: 11060 (v4.4), 2801 (v5.1) GFXBench: 28fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Motorola One Fusion+
- Exceptional battery life (136h endurance)
- Potentially lower price point (depending on market)
- Decent performance for everyday tasks
- Slower Snapdragon 730 chipset
- Slow 15W charging
- Less bright display
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
- Faster Snapdragon 778G chipset
- Faster 25W charging
- Brighter display for better outdoor visibility
- Shorter battery life (113h endurance)
- Potentially higher price point
- May experience more thermal throttling under sustained load
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching 800 nits compared to the Motorola One Fusion+'s 562 nits. This translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While Motorola quotes a 1423:1 contrast ratio, Samsung’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio (typically associated with AMOLED panels, though not explicitly stated here) suggests deeper blacks and more vibrant colors. The lack of information on panel type for the Motorola is a drawback; the A52s 5G’s display is demonstrably superior for media consumption and general usability due to its brightness and likely color reproduction.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is lacking. Without specifics, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, the A52s 5G’s more powerful ISP (Image Signal Processor) within the Snapdragon 778G likely provides superior image processing, resulting in better dynamic range and low-light performance. The absence of details on OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) for either device makes it impossible to assess video stabilization capabilities. We can assume the A52s 5G, being the newer and more premium device, likely has a more refined camera system overall.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G’s Snapdragon 778G (6nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Motorola One Fusion+'s Snapdragon 730 (8nm). The 778G features a more modern CPU architecture – a Cortex-A78 prime core versus the Kryo 470 Gold in the 730 – resulting in faster single-core and multi-core performance. The 6nm process node also contributes to improved power efficiency and thermal management. This means the A52s 5G will handle demanding tasks like gaming and video editing with greater ease and less throttling. The A52s 5G’s GPU is also significantly more powerful, offering a better gaming experience.
Battery Life
The Motorola One Fusion+ holds a clear advantage in endurance, achieving a 136-hour rating compared to the A52s 5G’s 113 hours. However, this doesn’t tell the whole story. The A52s 5G compensates with significantly faster 25W wired charging, allowing for a much quicker top-up. The One Fusion+ is limited to 15W charging, meaning a full charge will take considerably longer. While the Motorola excels in longevity, the A52s 5G’s faster charging mitigates the battery life difference for many users.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola One Fusion+ if you prioritize maximum battery life and are willing to accept slightly slower performance and charging speeds. It’s ideal for users who heavily rely on their phone throughout the day and rarely have access to a power outlet. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G if you value a smoother, more responsive user experience, faster charging, and a brighter display – making it the better option for gamers, media consumers, and those who demand quicker performance.