The Motorola One Fusion+ and Realme 8 Pro represent compelling options in the crowded mid-range smartphone market. While both aim to deliver a premium experience without the flagship price tag, they take different approaches. The Fusion+ prioritizes sustained performance with the Snapdragon 730, while the 8 Pro focuses on rapid charging and a potentially more vibrant display. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing convenience and quick top-ups, the Realme 8 Pro is the better choice. Its 50W charging significantly reduces downtime, offsetting its slightly lower endurance rating. However, users who value sustained performance during extended gaming or multitasking should lean towards the Motorola One Fusion+.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 International | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 19, 20, 38, 40, 41 - Europe, India | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - APEM | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 - Asia |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, June 08. Released 2020, June 08 | 2021, March 24 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, March 25 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 162.9 x 76.4 x 9.6 mm (6.41 x 3.01 x 0.38 in) | 160.6 x 73.9 x 8.1 mm (6.32 x 2.91 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 210 g (7.41 oz) | 176 g (6.21 oz) |
| | Water-repellent coating | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~396 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 103.7 cm2 (~83.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~83.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, HDR10 | Super AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 1000 nits (peak) |
| | - | Always-on display |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 470 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 470 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM730 Snapdragon 730 (8 nm) - EuropeQualcomm SDM730 Snapdragon 730G (8 nm) - India | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Adreno 618 |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, Realme UI 3.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.3, 119˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | Motorized pop-up 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio (market/region dependent) | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | 50W wired, 50% in 17 min, 100% in 47 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Moonlight White, Twilight Blue | Infinite Blue, Infinite Black, Punk Black, Illuminating Yellow |
| Models | PAKF0002IN | RMX3081 |
| Price | About 300 EUR | About 550 EUR |
| SAR | 0.52 W/kg (head) 1.43 W/kg (body) | 1.10 W/kg (head) 0.53 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 136h
|
Endurance rating 116h
|
| Camera |
Photo / Video |
Photo / Video |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: 1423:1 (nominal) |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker |
-27.9 LUFS (Good)
|
-28.2 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 267980 (v8)
GeekBench: 1705 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 14fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
AnTuTu: 286666 (v8)
GeekBench: 1678 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Motorola One Fusion+
- Longer battery life (136h endurance)
- More sustained performance with Snapdragon 730/730G
- Higher measured display brightness
- Slower 15W charging
- Less emphasis on camera features in marketing
Realme 8 Pro
- Ultra-fast 50W charging (0-100% in 47 mins)
- Potentially more vibrant display (though unconfirmed)
- Strong camera marketing and potential features
- Shorter battery life (116h endurance)
- Snapdragon 720G may throttle under sustained load
Display Comparison
Both phones feature displays with a focus on maximizing screen real estate, but differ in their specifications. The Motorola One Fusion+ boasts a measured peak brightness of 562 nits and a 1423:1 contrast ratio, providing a solid viewing experience. The Realme 8 Pro, however, claims an 'Infinite' contrast ratio – a common marketing term that doesn't translate to a quantifiable advantage. While the Realme 8 Pro's display *may* offer more vibrant colors, the Fusion+'s measured brightness provides a more concrete advantage in outdoor visibility. The lack of detailed display specs for the Realme 8 Pro makes a direct comparison difficult, but the Fusion+'s numbers are respectable for its price point.
Camera Comparison
Both phones advertise capable camera systems, but specifics are limited. Both list 'Photo / Video' capabilities, lacking detail. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is challenging. However, the Realme 8 Pro's marketing often emphasizes its camera prowess, suggesting a focus on image processing and potentially more advanced features. The Motorola One Fusion+ likely offers a more balanced camera experience, prioritizing accuracy and consistency. The absence of detailed camera specs necessitates relying on real-world testing for a definitive assessment.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Motorola One Fusion+ utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (or 730G in India), built on an 8nm process, featuring an octa-core CPU with a 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 470 Gold and 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 470 Silver configuration. The Realme 8 Pro is powered by the Snapdragon 720G, also on an 8nm process, but with a slightly faster 2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold and 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver setup. While the 720G has a marginally higher clock speed, the 730/730G generally offers better sustained performance due to its more efficient architecture and improved thermal management. This translates to less throttling during extended gaming or resource-intensive tasks, giving the Fusion+ an edge for power users.
Battery Life
The Motorola One Fusion+ delivers an endurance rating of 136 hours, indicating superior battery life compared to the Realme 8 Pro's 116 hours. However, the Realme 8 Pro compensates with its blazing-fast 50W wired charging, capable of reaching 50% charge in just 17 minutes and 100% in 47 minutes. This drastically reduces downtime, making it ideal for users who frequently need to top up their battery. The Fusion+'s 15W charging is considerably slower, requiring significantly more time to reach a full charge. The trade-off is clear: longer runtime with the Fusion+, or rapid replenishment with the 8 Pro.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola One Fusion+ if you need a phone that can handle prolonged gaming sessions or demanding applications without significant throttling, and if you prefer a longer-lasting battery even if it means slower charging. Buy the Realme 8 Pro if you prioritize fast charging, want a phone that can quickly recover from heavy use, and appreciate a potentially more visually striking display, even if it comes at the cost of some sustained performance.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 720G in the Realme 8 Pro struggle with graphically demanding games like PUBG or Call of Duty?
While the Snapdragon 720G is capable, it may exhibit some throttling during extended gaming sessions at high settings. The Motorola One Fusion+'s Snapdragon 730/730G is better equipped to handle sustained loads, offering a smoother experience for prolonged gaming. Lowering graphics settings on the Realme 8 Pro can mitigate this issue.
❓ How significant is the difference in charging speed between 15W and 50W? Is the Realme 8 Pro's charging *really* that much faster?
The difference is substantial. 50W charging on the Realme 8 Pro can fully charge the phone in approximately 47 minutes, while the Motorola One Fusion+'s 15W charging will take considerably longer – likely exceeding 2 hours. This means you can quickly top up the Realme 8 Pro during short breaks, whereas the Fusion+ requires a more extended charging period.
❓ Given the limited camera details, should I prioritize other factors over the camera when choosing between these two phones?
Yes, given the lack of specific camera specs (sensor size, aperture, OIS), it's prudent to prioritize other factors like performance, battery life, and charging speed. Both phones likely offer adequate camera performance for casual use, but neither stands out as a clear camera champion based on the available information.
