Choosing a new smartphone can be overwhelming. The Motorola One Fusion and Samsung Galaxy A34 both offer compelling features at competitive prices, but cater to different needs. This comprehensive comparison will break down their strengths and weaknesses to help you make the best decision.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A34 is the clear winner. Its superior display, faster charging, more powerful chipset, and generally better camera system outweigh the Motorola One Fusion's potential cost savings. The A34 offers a more modern and refined experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 19, 28, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, July 02. Released 2020, July 02 | 2023, March 14 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2023, March 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 165 x 75.9 x 9.4 mm (6.50 x 2.99 x 0.37 in) | 161.3 x 78.1 x 8.2 mm (6.35 x 3.07 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 202 g (7.13 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| | Water-repellent coating | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~390 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 106.9 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz 360 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 360 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM710 Snapdragon 710 (10 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 616 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 6.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 123˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@480fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0 | 13 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio (market/region dependent) | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Emerald Green, Deep Sapphire Blue | Lime, Graphite, Violet, Silver |
| Models | XT2073-2 | SM-A346E, SM-A346B, SM-A346B/DS, SM-A346B/DSN, SM-A346E/DS, SM-A346E/DSN, SM-A346M, SM-A346M/N, SM-A346M/DSN, SM-A3460 |
| Price | About 100 EUR | € 169.99 / $ 175.00 / £ 164.99 / ₹ 23,999 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.55 W/kg (head) 1.49 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 133h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.1 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 472126 (v9)
GeekBench: 2316 (v5.5), 2518 (v6)
GFXBench: 23fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Motorola One Fusion
- Large Display
- Potentially Lower Price
- Decent Battery Life
- Outdated Chipset
- Slow Charging
- Lower Display Quality
- Less Powerful Camera
Samsung Galaxy A34
- Bright & Vibrant Display
- Powerful Chipset
- Fast Charging
- Excellent Camera
- Modern Design
- Higher Price
- Samsung's Software (subjective)
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A34 boasts a significantly brighter display (1009 nits vs. likely around 400 nits for the One Fusion) and an 'infinite' contrast ratio, providing richer colors and deeper blacks. The A34's display is also likely to have a higher resolution and refresh rate, resulting in a smoother visual experience. The One Fusion's display is adequate but lacks the vibrancy and clarity of the A34.
Camera Comparison
While both phones offer Photo/Video capabilities, the Samsung Galaxy A34 is expected to have a superior camera system. Samsung's image processing is generally excellent, and the A34 likely features a higher resolution main sensor and improved low-light performance. The One Fusion's camera is decent for casual snapshots but lacks the detail and dynamic range of the A34.
Performance
The Samsung Galaxy A34's MediaTek Dimensity 1080 chipset (6nm) offers a substantial performance advantage over the Motorola One Fusion's Snapdragon 710 (10nm). The Dimensity 1080's newer architecture and more efficient manufacturing process translate to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance. The One Fusion can handle everyday tasks, but will struggle with demanding applications.
Battery Life
Both phones have an endurance rating of 133h, suggesting excellent battery life. However, the Samsung Galaxy A34's 25W wired charging is significantly faster than the Motorola One Fusion's 10W charging, allowing for quicker top-ups.
Buying Guide
The Motorola One Fusion is a good option for budget-conscious users who prioritize a large display and don't need top-tier performance. The Samsung Galaxy A34 is ideal for those seeking a well-rounded smartphone with a vibrant display, solid performance, and a capable camera, willing to spend a bit more.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Motorola One Fusion still worth buying in 2024?
Only if you're on an extremely tight budget and prioritize a large screen above all else. Otherwise, newer phones offer significantly better value.
❓ Which phone has better software support?
The Samsung Galaxy A34 will receive longer software and security updates compared to the Motorola One Fusion, which is likely nearing the end of its support lifecycle.
