The Motorola One Fusion and Samsung Galaxy A12 (India) represent compelling options in the fiercely competitive budget smartphone market. While both aim to deliver essential features at an accessible price point, they diverge significantly in their core hardware. This comparison dissects the differences between the Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 and Exynos 850 chipsets, evaluating their impact on performance, battery life, and overall user experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and a more refined software experience, the Motorola One Fusion edges out the Samsung Galaxy A12 (India). While the A12 boasts faster 15W charging, the Snapdragon 710’s architecture provides a smoother experience for multitasking and moderately demanding applications.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 19, 28, 66 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, July 02. Released 2020, July 02 | 2021, August 12 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, August 12 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 165 x 75.9 x 9.4 mm (6.50 x 2.99 x 0.37 in) | 164 x 75.8 x 8.9 mm (6.46 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 202 g (7.13 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| | Water-repellent coating | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~82.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | PLS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz 360 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 360 Silver) | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM710 Snapdragon 710 (10 nm) | Exynos 850 (8 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 616 | Mali-G52 |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, One UI 5.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), AF
5 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0 | 8 MP, f/2.2 |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio (market/region dependent) | FM radio, RDS, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 15W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Emerald Green, Deep Sapphire Blue | Black, Blue, White |
| Models | XT2073-2 | SM-A127F, SM-A127F/DS |
| Price | About 100 EUR | About 160 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.79 W/kg (head) |
Motorola One Fusion
- More powerful and mature Snapdragon 710 chipset
- Potentially smoother multitasking and gaming
- Superior image processing capabilities
- Slower 10W charging
- Likely less optimized software support compared to Samsung
Samsung Galaxy A12 (India)
- Faster 15W wired charging
- Strong Samsung brand reputation and ecosystem integration
- Efficient Exynos 850 for basic tasks
- Less powerful chipset for demanding applications
- Potentially slower app launch times
- Image processing may be less refined
Display Comparison
Neither device is known for a standout display. Given the context data lacks display specifics, we can infer both likely utilize LCD panels common in this price bracket. The key difference lies in the chipset’s impact on display responsiveness. The Snapdragon 710’s more powerful GPU *could* translate to slightly smoother scrolling and animations, though this is highly dependent on software optimization. Bezels are likely comparable, reflecting the budget nature of both devices.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is limited. However, the chipset plays a role in image processing speed. The Snapdragon 710’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) is generally more capable than the Exynos 850’s, potentially leading to faster image capture and better low-light performance. It’s reasonable to assume both phones feature a primary camera and multiple auxiliary lenses (likely including a depth sensor and macro lens). The usefulness of the macro lens on both devices is questionable given the typical 2MP resolution found in this segment. The Snapdragon 710’s superior processing power could also enable more sophisticated image processing algorithms.
Performance
The core of the difference lies in the chipsets. The Motorola One Fusion’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (10nm) utilizes a dual-cluster architecture with performance-focused 'Gold' cores clocked at 2.2GHz and efficiency-focused 'Silver' cores at 1.7GHz. This contrasts with the Samsung Galaxy A12’s Exynos 850 (8nm) which employs eight Cortex-A55 cores all clocked at 2.0GHz. While the Exynos 850 benefits from a smaller 8nm process, the Snapdragon 710’s architecture is more mature and generally delivers superior single-core performance. This translates to snappier app launches and a more responsive user interface. The Exynos 850’s homogenous core configuration prioritizes efficiency, making it suitable for sustained, less demanding tasks. Users engaging in moderate gaming or multitasking will likely experience better performance on the Motorola One Fusion.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy A12 (India) has a clear advantage in charging speed with its 15W wired charging support, compared to the Motorola One Fusion’s 10W charging. This means a significantly faster 0-100% charge time for the A12. However, battery life is a more complex equation. While the mAh capacity isn’t specified, the Snapdragon 710’s 10nm process and efficient core configuration could potentially offset a slightly smaller battery capacity, offering comparable real-world battery endurance. The Exynos 850’s efficiency will contribute to good standby times, but the slower charging speed is a notable drawback for users who frequently need to top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola One Fusion if you need a phone capable of handling moderate gaming and multitasking without significant slowdowns, and value a more established chipset architecture. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A12 (India) if you prioritize faster charging speeds and are primarily focused on basic smartphone tasks like calling, messaging, and light social media use. The A12 is also a better choice for users heavily invested in the Samsung ecosystem.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Exynos 850 chip in the Galaxy A12 tend to overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Exynos 850 is designed for efficiency, and while it won't deliver flagship-level gaming performance, it's less prone to overheating than more powerful chips. However, sustained gaming will still generate heat, and performance may be throttled to prevent damage. The Snapdragon 710 in the Motorola One Fusion, while older, also benefits from a mature thermal design.
❓ Is the 2MP macro camera on either of these phones actually useful for taking detailed close-up photos?
Generally, no. 2MP macro cameras found in this price range typically lack the resolution and optics to produce truly detailed close-up shots. They often result in blurry or noisy images. They are primarily included as a marketing feature rather than a genuinely useful camera function.
❓ Can the Motorola One Fusion handle popular games like PUBG Mobile at reasonable frame rates?
The Snapdragon 710 can run PUBG Mobile, but you'll likely need to compromise on graphics settings to achieve consistently smooth frame rates. Expect to play at medium settings for a balanced experience. The Exynos 850 will likely require even lower settings to maintain playable performance.
❓ Which phone is likely to receive more software updates and security patches?
Samsung generally provides more consistent and longer-term software support for its devices compared to Motorola. While Motorola has improved in recent years, Samsung’s commitment to updates is typically stronger, making the Galaxy A12 a potentially safer choice for long-term security.
