The Motorola One Fusion and Nokia G20 represent two approaches to the ultra-budget smartphone market. The Motorola, leveraging Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 710, aims for a balance of performance and efficiency. The Nokia G20, powered by MediaTek’s Helio G35, prioritizes affordability and extended battery life. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device delivers the most value for the price-conscious consumer.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing smoother multitasking and a more responsive experience, the Motorola One Fusion is the better choice. Its Snapdragon 710 chipset, built on a 10nm process, offers a significant performance advantage over the Nokia G20’s Helio G35. While both phones offer similar battery capacity and slow 10W charging, the Motorola’s superior processing power makes it the winner for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 19, 28, 66 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 28, 66 - LATAM |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, July 02. Released 2020, July 02 | 2021, April 08 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, May 17 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | 165 x 75.9 x 9.4 mm (6.50 x 2.99 x 0.37 in) | 164.9 x 76 x 9.2 mm (6.49 x 2.99 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 202 g (7.13 oz) | 197 g (6.95 oz) |
| | Water-repellent coating | Splash protection |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~81.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz 360 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 360 Silver) | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM710 Snapdragon 710 (10 nm) | Mediatek MT6765G Helio G35 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 616 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.7, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
5 MP, (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 8 MP, (wide) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0 | 8 MP, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio (market/region dependent) | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 10W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5050 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Emerald Green, Deep Sapphire Blue | Glacier, Night |
| Models | XT2073-2 | TA-1336, TA-1343, TA-1347, TA-1372, TA-1365 |
| Price | About 100 EUR | About 90 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.01 W/kg (head) 1.02 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.49 W/kg (head) 1.13 W/kg (body) |
Motorola One Fusion
- Superior processor performance with Snapdragon 710
- More efficient 10nm process for better battery life
- More capable ISP for improved camera quality
- Slow 10W charging
- May be slightly more expensive than the Nokia G20
Nokia G20
- Potentially lower price point
- Decent battery life for basic usage
- Simple and straightforward Android experience
- Significantly weaker processor performance with Helio G35
- Less efficient 12nm process
- Inferior ISP leading to lower camera quality
Display Comparison
Neither Motorola nor Nokia provide display specifications beyond resolution in their marketing materials. However, both likely utilize LCD panels common in this price bracket. The real difference lies under the hood. The Motorola One Fusion’s Snapdragon 710 benefits from a more powerful ISP, potentially leading to better image processing for display. The Nokia G20’s Helio G35, while newer, is a lower-tier chipset and may exhibit more noticeable lag when scrolling or transitioning between apps, impacting the perceived smoothness of the display.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the Snapdragon 710’s image signal processor (ISP) is significantly more capable than the Helio G35’s. This translates to better image processing, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. While both phones likely feature similar sensor resolutions in their main cameras, the Motorola One Fusion will likely produce more detailed and dynamic images due to the superior ISP. The Nokia G20 may rely more heavily on software processing to compensate for the weaker ISP, potentially leading to over-sharpened or artificial-looking images. The presence of a dedicated ISP on the Snapdragon 710 also aids in faster autofocus and improved video stabilization.
Performance
The core difference between these phones is the chipset. The Motorola One Fusion’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (10nm) features a dual-cluster CPU configuration – 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A75 (branded as Kryo 360 Gold) for performance and 6x1.7 GHz Cortex-A55 (Kryo 360 Silver) for efficiency. This contrasts with the Nokia G20’s MediaTek Helio G35 (12nm), which uses a homogenous octa-core setup of 4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 and 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. The Snapdragon 710’s A75 cores provide a substantial performance uplift over the G35’s A53 cores, resulting in faster app launch times and smoother multitasking. The 10nm process node of the Snapdragon 710 also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of throttling during sustained workloads. While the Helio G35’s 12nm process is theoretically more efficient, the architectural differences in the CPU cores heavily favor the Snapdragon 710.
Battery Life
Both the Motorola One Fusion and Nokia G20 feature similar battery capacities (exact mAh not specified in context data, but likely around 5000mAh based on market segment). However, the Snapdragon 710’s superior efficiency, stemming from its 10nm process, means the Motorola One Fusion will likely achieve comparable or even better battery life despite its higher performance. Both phones are limited to 10W wired charging, resulting in slow charging times – expect over 3 hours for a full charge from 0%. The difference in charging speed will be negligible between the two devices.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola One Fusion if you need a phone capable of handling moderate gaming, smoother app switching, and a generally more fluid user experience. It’s ideal for users who occasionally stream videos or play casual games. Buy the Nokia G20 if your primary needs are basic communication – calls, texts, and light social media – and you prioritize maximizing battery life over raw performance. It’s a good fit for first-time smartphone users or those on a very tight budget.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Nokia G20 struggle with popular apps like Facebook or WhatsApp?
The Nokia G20’s Helio G35 chipset is designed for basic tasks. While it can run apps like Facebook and WhatsApp, you may experience noticeable lag when switching between them or when the apps are performing complex operations like loading videos or scrolling through image-heavy feeds. The Motorola One Fusion’s Snapdragon 710 will handle these apps much more smoothly.
❓ Is the Motorola One Fusion a good choice for playing mobile games?
The Motorola One Fusion is a better choice for mobile gaming than the Nokia G20. The Snapdragon 710 offers significantly more processing power, allowing it to run most casual games at playable frame rates. However, don’t expect to max out the graphics settings on demanding titles. The Nokia G20 will struggle with even moderately demanding games.
❓ How long will it take to fully charge either phone?
Both the Motorola One Fusion and Nokia G20 support only 10W charging. This means a full charge from 0% will take approximately 3 to 4 hours. Neither phone offers fast charging capabilities.
❓ Does the Nokia G20 benefit from its 12nm process node over the Motorola One Fusion's 10nm?
While a smaller process node generally indicates better efficiency, the architectural differences between the Helio G35 and Snapdragon 710 heavily favor the Motorola One Fusion. The Snapdragon 710’s more powerful CPU cores and dedicated ISP offset the slight efficiency advantage of the 12nm process, resulting in better overall performance and potentially similar battery life.
