Google Pixel 5a 5G vs Motorola One 5G: A Detailed Comparison

Both the Motorola One 5G and Google Pixel 5a 5G target the competitive mid-range 5G market, offering a blend of connectivity and affordability. However, they approach this goal with different strengths. The Motorola One 5G prioritizes a lower entry price, while the Pixel 5a 5G focuses on Google’s renowned camera software and a superior display experience. This comparison dissects the key differences to determine which phone delivers the best value.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user, the Google Pixel 5a 5G is the better choice. While both phones share the same Snapdragon 765 5G chipset family, the Pixel 5a 5G’s brighter display, faster 18W PD2.0 charging, and Google’s superior image processing provide a more polished and enjoyable user experience.

PHONES
Phone Names Motorola One 5G Google Pixel 5a 5G
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 711, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66, 71
5G bands2, 5, 25, 41, 66, 71 SA/NSA1, 2, 5, 12, 25, 28, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6
SpeedHSPA, LTE, 5GHSPA, LTE, 5G
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5GGSM / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G
 -CDMA2000 1xEV-DO
Launch
Announced2020, September 01. Released 2020, September 142021, August 17
StatusDiscontinuedAvailable. Released 2021, August 26
Body
BuildGlass front, plastic back, plastic frameGlass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, aluminum back
Dimensions168 x 74 x 9 mm (6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 in)156.2 x 73.2 x 8.8 mm (6.15 x 2.88 x 0.35 in)
SIMNano-SIMNano-SIM + eSIM
Weight207 g (7.30 oz)183 g (6.46 oz)
 Water-repellent coatingIP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min)
Display
Protection-Corning Gorilla Glass 3
Resolution1080 x 2520 pixels, 21:9 ratio (~409 ppi density)1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~415 ppi density)
Size6.7 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~84.3% screen-to-body ratio)6.34 inches, 97.0 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeIPS LCD, 90Hz, HDR10OLED, HDR
 -Always-on display
Platform
CPUOcta-core (1x2.3 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver)Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver)
ChipsetQualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765 5G (7 nm)Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm)
GPUAdreno 620Adreno 620
OSAndroid 10Android 11, upgradable to Android 14
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXC (dedicated slot)No
Internal128GB 4GB RAM128GB 6GB RAM
 UFS 2.1-
Main Camera
Dual-12.2 MP, f/1.7, 27mm, (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 16 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1.0µm
FeaturesDual-LED flash, ring flash (macro camera), panorama, HDRLED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama
Quad48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm 5 MP (macro), AF Auxiliary lens-
Single-8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1.12µm
Video4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS
Selfie camera
Dual16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1.0µm 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide), 1.12µm-
FeaturesHDRHDR
Single-8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1.12µm
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Sound
3.5mm jack YesYes
35mm jackYesYes
Loudspeaker YesYes, with stereo speakers
Comms
Bluetooth5.1, A2DP, LE5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD
NFCYesYes
PositioningGPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEOGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS, BDS
RadioFM radioNo
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 3.1
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
Battery
Charging15W wired18W wired, PD2.0
TypeLi-Po 5000 mAhLi-Po 4680 mAh
Misc
ColorsOxford BlueMostly Black
Models-G1F8F, G4S1M
PriceAbout 420 EUR$ 189.00 / C$ 249.99
Tests
Battery life- Endurance rating 122h
Display- Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal)
Performance- AnTuTu: 291303 (v8) GeekBench: 1337 (v5.1) GFXBench: 19fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

Motorola One 5G

  • More affordable price point
  • Functional 5G connectivity
  • Decent battery life

  • Dimmer display compared to Pixel 5a 5G
  • Slower 15W charging
  • Less refined camera software

Google Pixel 5a 5G

  • Brighter and more vibrant display
  • Faster 18W PD2.0 charging
  • Superior camera image processing

  • Higher price than Motorola One 5G
  • Similar chipset performance to Motorola One 5G
  • May be harder to find new

Display Comparison

The Google Pixel 5a 5G boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 861 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the Motorola One 5G. This higher peak brightness translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. Both displays feature an infinite (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting excellent black levels. While both likely utilize OLED panels, the Pixel 5a 5G’s superior brightness is a clear advantage for media consumption and everyday use.

Camera Comparison

While both phones likely feature similar camera hardware configurations beyond the main sensor, the Pixel 5a 5G’s strength lies in Google’s computational photography. The Pixel’s image processing excels in dynamic range, detail preservation, and low-light performance. The Motorola One 5G’s camera system, while capable, lacks the software refinement of the Pixel. Details regarding sensor sizes and apertures are missing, but the Pixel’s software advantage is a significant differentiator.

Performance

Both devices are powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 5G (7nm) chipset, but the Pixel 5a 5G features a slightly higher clocked Kryo 475 Prime core at 2.4 GHz versus the Motorola One 5G’s 2.3 GHz. This minor clock speed difference likely results in a negligible performance gain in most real-world scenarios. Both phones share the same CPU core configuration (1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver). The impact of RAM speed isn't specified, but both likely utilize LPDDR4X. Thermal management will likely be similar, given the identical chipset architecture, though Google’s software optimization could provide a slight edge.

Battery Life

Both the Motorola One 5G and Google Pixel 5a 5G achieve an endurance rating of 122 hours, indicating comparable battery life under similar usage patterns. However, the Pixel 5a 5G supports 18W wired charging with PD2.0, offering faster charging speeds than the Motorola One 5G’s 15W charging. This means the Pixel 5a 5G can replenish its battery more quickly, reducing downtime.

Buying Guide

Buy the Motorola One 5G if you need a functional 5G phone on a very tight budget and prioritize affordability above all else. Buy the Google Pixel 5a 5G if you value a brighter, more vibrant display, faster charging speeds, and Google’s exceptional camera software, even if it means spending a bit more.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Does the Snapdragon 765G in the Pixel 5a 5G offer a noticeable gaming performance boost over the 765 in the Motorola One 5G?
While the Pixel 5a 5G’s slightly higher clocked CPU core (2.4 GHz vs 2.3 GHz) offers a marginal improvement, the difference in gaming performance will be minimal. Both phones are capable of handling most mobile games at medium settings, but demanding titles may require lower graphics settings to maintain stable frame rates. The GPU remains the same in both devices.
❓ How does the Pixel 5a 5G’s software support compare to the Motorola One 5G, considering long-term updates?
Google provides significantly better software support for the Pixel 5a 5G. Pixel phones receive guaranteed Android version and security updates for a longer period than Motorola devices. The Motorola One 5G will likely receive fewer updates, potentially leaving it vulnerable to security threats over time.
❓ Is the 18W charging on the Pixel 5a 5G a significant improvement over the 15W charging on the Motorola One 5G in real-world usage?
Yes, the 18W charging with PD2.0 on the Pixel 5a 5G noticeably reduces charging times. While a full charge from 0-100% will still take over an hour, the faster charging speed provides a more convenient top-up experience, allowing you to quickly add battery life when needed.