Motorola one 5G UW ace vs. Moto G Stylus 5G (2025): A Deep Dive into 5G Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-day battery life and a vibrant display, the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) is the clear winner. Its 68W charging and impressive 10:05 hour active use score significantly outweigh the one 5G UW ace’s older chipset, making it the more practical daily driver.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola one 5G UW ace | Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 48, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | 2, 5, 66, 71, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - Verizon, USA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 12, 14, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 70, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, July 08 | 2025, April 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, July 08 | Available. Released 2025, April 17 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), silicone polymer (eco leather) back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 166.1 x 76 x 9.9 mm (6.54 x 2.99 x 0.39 in) | 162.2 x 74.8 x 8.3 mm (6.39 x 2.94 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 213.5 g (7.51 oz) | 191 g (6.74 oz) |
| Water-repellent coating | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~444 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, HDR10 | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR, 3000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM6475-AB Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 710 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 15, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm 2 MP (macro), AF | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 25mm (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers (with Dolby Atmos) |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Unspecified | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 20W wired | 68W wired 15W wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Volcanic Gray | Pantone: Gibraltar sea, Surf the Web |
| Models | - | XT2517-1 |
| Price | About 250 EUR | $ 299.99 / C$ 368.17 |
Motorola one 5G UW ace
- Proven 5G performance with Snapdragon 750G
- Potentially lower price point (due to age)
- Familiar Motorola software experience
- Slower 20W charging
- Less efficient chipset (8nm)
- Likely dimmer display
Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025)
- Significantly faster 68W wired & 15W wireless charging
- Brighter 1870 nit display
- More efficient Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (4nm)
- Potentially higher price
- Newer chipset may have initial software quirks
- Stylus may not be desired by all users
Display Comparison
The Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1870 nits, compared to the one 5G UW ace’s unspecified brightness. This difference is crucial for outdoor visibility. While panel technology isn’t specified for either, the higher peak brightness suggests a more advanced LCD or potentially OLED panel in the Stylus. The ace likely uses a standard LCD. Bezels are assumed to be similar given the market segment, but the Stylus’s brightness advantage is a clear win for media consumption and usability in bright conditions.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is difficult. However, Motorola typically focuses on main sensor performance in this price range. We can assume both phones feature multi-camera setups, but the absence of information regarding sensor size and aperture makes it hard to determine a clear winner. The ace’s camera is likely tuned for quick snapshots, while the Stylus may benefit from the newer ISP within the Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, potentially offering improved image processing and low-light performance. We'll disregard the likely presence of low-resolution macro lenses on both devices.
Performance
The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) utilizes the Qualcomm SM6475-AB Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (4nm), a more modern and efficient chipset than the one 5G UW ace’s Snapdragon 750G (8nm). The 4nm process node of the Gen 3 translates to better thermal efficiency and improved power management. While the ace’s Kryo 570 cores offer a 2.2 GHz peak clock speed, the Stylus counters with Cortex-A78 cores at 2.4 GHz, providing a performance edge in CPU-intensive tasks. The newer chipset also benefits from architectural improvements, leading to smoother multitasking and app loading times. The ace's 5G modem is a known quantity, but the Gen 3 offers improved 5G capabilities as well.
Battery Life
The Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) shines in the battery department. Its active use score of 10:05 hours demonstrates excellent endurance, likely due to the efficient Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 chipset. The ace’s battery capacity is unknown, but its older, less efficient chipset and 20W charging pale in comparison to the Stylus’s 68W wired and 15W wireless charging capabilities. The Stylus can likely achieve a full charge in under an hour, while the ace will take considerably longer. This charging speed difference is a significant convenience factor.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola one 5G UW ace if you need a phone with a proven 5G modem and are comfortable with slower charging speeds. It’s a solid choice for users already invested in the UW ecosystem. Buy the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) if you prefer a brighter, more efficient display, significantly faster charging, and a more modern processor for everyday tasks and light multitasking.