Both the Motorola one 5G UW ace and the LG K92 5G represent attempts to bring 5G connectivity to a more accessible price point. However, they achieve this with different chipsets – the Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G in the Motorola and the Snapdragon 690 in the LG – leading to distinct performance characteristics. This comparison will dissect those differences, focusing on real-world impact for the average user.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Motorola one 5G UW ace emerges as the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 750G chipset offers a noticeable performance advantage over the LG K92 5G’s Snapdragon 690, translating to smoother multitasking and better gaming experiences. While the LG K92 5G benefits from Quick Charge 4.0, the Motorola’s overall processing power provides a more compelling user experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 48, 66 | LTE |
| 5G bands | 2, 5, 66, 71, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - Verizon, USA | SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, July 08 | 2020, September 29. Released 2020, November 06 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, July 08 | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 166.1 x 76 x 9.9 mm (6.54 x 2.99 x 0.39 in) | 166.4 x 77.2 x 8.4 mm (6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 213.5 g (7.51 oz) | 202.4 g (7.13 oz) |
| | Water-repellent coating | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, HDR10 | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 560 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 560 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM6350 Snapdragon 690 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 619L |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 10 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Quad-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF
5 MP, f/2.2, 115˚ (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm
2 MP (macro), AF | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.0, 27mm (wide), 1/3.06, 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Unspecified | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 20W wired | Quick Charge 4.0 |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Volcanic Gray | Titan Gray |
| Models | - | LMK920, LM-K920 |
| Price | About 250 EUR | About 340 EUR |
Motorola one 5G UW ace
- Superior CPU and GPU performance with Snapdragon 750G
- More efficient chipset for potentially longer battery life
- Better image processing capabilities
- Slower charging speed compared to LG K92 5G (potentially)
- May be slightly more expensive
LG K92 5G
- Faster charging with Quick Charge 4.0 (with compatible charger)
- Potentially lower price point
- Acceptable performance for basic tasks
- Noticeably slower CPU and GPU performance
- Less efficient chipset
- Image processing may be less refined
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both likely utilize LCD panels, common in this price bracket. The key difference lies under the hood: the Motorola one 5G UW ace’s chipset is more capable of driving higher refresh rate displays, though this isn’t confirmed. The LG K92 5G’s Snapdragon 690 may struggle to maintain a consistently smooth experience at higher refresh rates if implemented. Bezels are likely comparable, and color accuracy will be typical for mid-range LCDs.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the chipset plays a role in image processing. The Snapdragon 750G’s more powerful ISP (Image Signal Processor) in the Motorola one 5G UW ace will likely result in faster image processing, better noise reduction, and improved dynamic range compared to the LG K92 5G. The presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on either device would be a significant advantage, but is unknown. Focusing on the main sensor resolution is misleading; sensor size and image processing are far more critical.
Performance
The core of the difference lies in the chipsets. The Motorola one 5G UW ace’s Snapdragon 750G (8nm) features a more modern CPU architecture – Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570) – compared to the LG K92 5G’s Snapdragon 690 (8nm) with its Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 560 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 560 Silver). The 750G’s higher clock speeds and newer Kryo cores translate to approximately 15-20% better CPU performance in benchmarks. This advantage extends to GPU performance, making the Motorola the better choice for mobile gaming. While both use 8nm fabrication, the architectural improvements in the 750G provide a clear edge.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified, but the charging speeds offer a clear distinction. The Motorola one 5G UW ace supports 20W wired charging, while the LG K92 5G utilizes Quick Charge 4.0. Quick Charge 4.0 *can* deliver higher wattage, but depends on the charger used. Assuming a compatible charger, the LG K92 5G will likely achieve a faster 0-100% charge time. However, the Snapdragon 750G’s improved efficiency in the Motorola may offset this with better overall battery life during typical usage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola one 5G UW ace if you prioritize responsiveness and smoother performance for everyday tasks and light to moderate gaming. Its Snapdragon 750G provides a more future-proof experience. Buy the LG K92 5G if you value faster charging speeds and are primarily focused on basic smartphone functions like calling, texting, and light social media use, and are less concerned with demanding applications.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Motorola one 5G UW ace handle demanding games like Genshin Impact or Call of Duty Mobile?
The Snapdragon 750G is capable of running these games, but you'll likely need to lower graphics settings to achieve a consistently smooth frame rate. The LG K92 5G’s Snapdragon 690 will struggle significantly with these titles, requiring substantial compromises in visual fidelity.
❓ Does the LG K92 5G’s Quick Charge 4.0 support Power Delivery (PD) charging?
Quick Charge 4.0 is backward compatible with Quick Charge 2.0 and 3.0, but full Power Delivery (PD) support is not guaranteed. It depends on the specific implementation by LG. Using a PD charger *may* work, but it's not a certainty.
❓ Is the difference in performance between the Snapdragon 750G and 690 noticeable in everyday tasks like browsing and social media?
Yes, the difference is noticeable. The Motorola one 5G UW ace will feel snappier and more responsive when switching between apps, scrolling through webpages, and performing other common tasks. The LG K92 5G may exhibit occasional lag or stuttering.
❓ Which phone is better for taking photos in low-light conditions?
The Motorola one 5G UW ace is likely to perform better in low-light due to the more advanced image processing capabilities of the Snapdragon 750G’s ISP. This will result in less noise and better detail in dimly lit scenes.
