Motorola One 5G Ace vs OnePlus Nord N10 5G: A Deep Dive into Budget 5G
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Motorola One 5G Ace emerges as the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 750G chipset provides a noticeable performance edge over the Nord N10 5G’s Snapdragon 690, making it better suited for gaming and demanding applications. While the Nord N10 5G boasts faster 30W charging, the Ace’s superior processing power offers a more impactful everyday experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola One 5G Ace | OnePlus Nord N10 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 2, 5, 25, 41, 66, 71 Sub6 | 1, 3, 7, 28, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1024/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 2, 5, 25, 41, 66, 71 SA/NSA - USA | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, January 08 | 2020, October 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, January 14 | Available. Released 2020, November 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 166.1 x 76.1 x 9.9 mm (6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 in) | 163 x 74.7 x 9 mm (6.42 x 2.94 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 212 g (7.48 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| Water-repellent coating | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~406 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~85.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.49 inches, 101.7 cm2 (~83.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, HDR10 | IPS LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 560 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 560 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM6350 Snapdragon 690 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 619L |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 10, OxygenOS 10.5 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.3, 119˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm 2 MP (macro), AF | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.1 |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | 30W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4300 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Volcanic Gray, Frosted Silver | Midnight Ice |
| Models | XT2113-2, XT2113-5 | BE2029, BE2025, BE2026, BE2028 |
| Price | About 50 EUR | About 250 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 99h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.8 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 279579 (v8) GeekBench: 1848 (v5.1) GFXBench: 13fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Motorola One 5G Ace
- Superior processor performance with Snapdragon 750G
- Potentially better long-term software support (Motorola's recent improvements)
- More future-proof chipset for 5G applications
- Slower 15W charging
- Display specifications are unknown, potentially less vibrant
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
- Faster 30W wired charging
- Decent display brightness and contrast ratio
- Good battery endurance (99h rating)
- Less powerful Snapdragon 690 chipset
- Potentially slower app loading and multitasking
- May struggle with demanding games
Display Comparison
The OnePlus Nord N10 5G provides a measured peak brightness of 440 nits and a 1447:1 contrast ratio. While these are respectable figures, the Motorola One 5G Ace’s display specifications are not provided, suggesting a potentially less vibrant experience. However, without knowing the Ace’s panel type or brightness, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner. The Nord N10’s contrast ratio indicates a decent level of black depth, but the lack of information on the Ace’s display technology prevents a complete assessment of viewing quality.
Camera Comparison
Both devices feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are lacking. Without sensor size, aperture, or image processing details, a direct comparison is impossible. However, given the market positioning, it’s likely both phones rely on similar mid-range camera modules. The absence of information suggests neither phone is a standout performer in the camera department, focusing instead on core functionality. We can assume both will offer acceptable image quality in good lighting conditions.
Performance
The Motorola One 5G Ace’s Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) chipset, with its octa-core configuration (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570), demonstrably outperforms the OnePlus Nord N10 5G’s Snapdragon 690 5G (8 nm) and its octa-core setup (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 560 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 560 Silver). The higher clock speeds of the Kryo 570 cores in the Ace translate to faster application loading times and smoother multitasking. The 750G also benefits from architectural improvements, offering better GPU performance for gaming. While both chips are 8nm, the 750G is a newer generation, resulting in improved efficiency.
Battery Life
Both the Motorola One 5G Ace and OnePlus Nord N10 5G share an endurance rating of 99 hours, indicating similar overall battery life. However, the charging speeds differ significantly. The Nord N10 5G supports 30W wired charging, while the Ace is limited to 15W. This means the Nord N10 5G can replenish its battery much faster, potentially mitigating any slight differences in battery capacity. The faster charging is a significant convenience factor for users who frequently need to top up their phones.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola One 5G Ace if you prioritize consistent performance for gaming, multitasking, and future-proofing. Its Snapdragon 750G offers a more robust platform for demanding tasks. Buy the OnePlus Nord N10 5G if fast charging is your absolute top priority and you primarily use your phone for basic tasks like browsing, social media, and light video consumption. The 30W charging will significantly reduce downtime.