Motorola One 5G Ace vs. Moto G Stylus 5G (2025): A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing battery life and a vibrant display, the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) is the clear winner. Its significantly faster 68W charging and 1870-nit display outweigh the One 5G Ace’s slightly older, but still capable, Snapdragon 750G.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola One 5G Ace | Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | 2, 5, 25, 41, 66, 71 Sub6 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 12, 14, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 70, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, January 08 | 2025, April 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, January 14 | Available. Released 2025, April 17 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), silicone polymer (eco leather) back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 166.1 x 76.1 x 9.9 mm (6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 in) | 162.2 x 74.8 x 8.3 mm (6.39 x 2.94 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 212 g (7.48 oz) | 191 g (6.74 oz) |
| Water-repellent coating | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~444 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~85.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, HDR10 | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR, 3000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM6475-AB Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 710 |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 15, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm 2 MP (macro), AF | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 25mm (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers (with Dolby Atmos) |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | 68W wired 15W wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Volcanic Gray, Frosted Silver | Pantone: Gibraltar sea, Surf the Web |
| Models | XT2113-2, XT2113-5 | XT2517-1 |
| Price | About 50 EUR | $ 299.99 / C$ 368.17 |
Motorola One 5G Ace
- More affordable price point (likely)
- 5G connectivity
- Functional for basic smartphone tasks
- Slow 15W charging
- Older Snapdragon 750G chipset
- Likely dimmer display
Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025)
- 68W wired and 15W wireless charging
- Bright 1870 nit display
- More efficient Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (4nm)
- Potentially higher price
- Stylus may not be useful for all users
- Larger size due to stylus integration
Display Comparison
The Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) boasts a substantial advantage in display technology, achieving a measured peak brightness of 1870 nits. This is a significant leap beyond what we’d expect from the One 5G Ace, making the G Stylus far more usable outdoors. While the One 5G Ace’s display specs are not provided, it’s likely to be considerably dimmer. The G Stylus’s brightness also suggests a more advanced panel, potentially with higher contrast and wider color gamut coverage. The lack of LTPO on either device means refresh rate is likely fixed, but the G Stylus’s superior brightness is the defining factor.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for either device, a direct comparison is difficult. However, Motorola typically focuses on main sensor resolution in its G series. We can assume the G Stylus 5G (2025) will feature a more modern sensor than the One 5G Ace. The absence of information regarding OIS or lens apertures makes it hard to assess image quality, but the newer chipset in the G Stylus likely provides improved image signal processing (ISP) capabilities, resulting in better dynamic range and low-light performance. We'll assume any 2MP macro sensors on either device are largely marketing features.
Performance
The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) utilizes the Qualcomm SM6475-AB Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, fabricated on a more efficient 4nm process. This contrasts with the One 5G Ace’s Snapdragon 750G (8nm). While the 750G features Kryo 570 cores, the G Stylus’s Cortex-A78 cores offer a performance uplift, particularly in sustained workloads. The 4nm process also translates to better thermal management, reducing the likelihood of throttling during extended gaming or demanding tasks. The G Stylus’s CPU configuration (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) is architecturally superior to the 750G’s (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570).
Battery Life
The Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) shines in battery and charging. Its active use score of 10:05h demonstrates excellent endurance. Crucially, it supports 68W wired charging, allowing for significantly faster top-ups compared to the One 5G Ace’s slow 15W charging. The addition of 15W wireless charging on the G Stylus further enhances convenience. While the One 5G Ace’s battery capacity is unknown, the G Stylus’s combination of efficiency from the 4nm chipset and rapid charging provides a clear advantage for users who demand all-day battery life and minimal downtime.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola One 5G Ace if you need a functional 5G phone on a very tight budget and aren't concerned with the latest charging or display technology. Buy the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) if you prioritize fast charging, a bright and vivid display for media consumption, and a more modern chipset offering improved efficiency.