Moto Z4 Force vs. Pixel 4 XL: A Deep Dive into Two Snapdragon 855 Contenders

The Motorola Moto Z4 Force and Google Pixel 4 XL, despite being released in different eras, share a core component: the Qualcomm Snapdragon 855. This comparison examines how each manufacturer leveraged this chipset, focusing on the trade-offs between camera capabilities, battery endurance, and current pricing, as the Pixel 4 XL has seen significant price drops since launch.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user prioritizing camera quality and software experience, the Google Pixel 4 XL is the better choice, especially at its current discounted price. However, the Moto Z4 Force offers compelling value for those seeking a capable Snapdragon 855 device at a significantly lower cost.

PHONES
Phone Names Motorola Moto Z4 Force Google Pixel 4 XL
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bandsLTE1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 - Global
SpeedHSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (5CA) Cat18 1200/150 MbpsHSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (5CA) Cat18 1200/150 Mbps
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTEGSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE
 -1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66, 71 - USA
Launch
AnnouncedNot announced yet2019, October 15
StatusCancelledAvailable. Released 2019, October 22
Body
Build-Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame
Dimensions-160.4 x 75.1 x 8.2 mm (6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 in)
SIM· Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + eSIM
Weight-193 g (6.81 oz)
 Splash and dust resistantIP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min)
Display
ProtectionCorning Gorilla Glass (unspecified version)Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Resolution1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density)1440 x 3040 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~537 ppi density)
Size6.4 inches, 100.5 cm26.3 inches, 98.0 cm2 (~81.3% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeSuper AMOLEDP-OLED, 90Hz, HDR
 -Always-on display
Platform
CPUOcta-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485)Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485)
ChipsetQualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 (7 nm)Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 (7 nm)
GPUAdreno 640Adreno 640
OSAndroid 9.0 (Pie)Android 10, upgradable to Android 13
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXC (uses shared SIM slot)No
Internal128GB 8GB RAM64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM
 -UFS 2.1
Main Camera
Dual-12.2 MP, f/1.7, 27mm (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 16 MP, f/2.4, 50mm (telephoto), 1/3.6", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 2x optical zoom
FeaturesDual-LED dual-tone flash, panorama, HDRDual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama
Triple48 MP, f/1.6, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.0, (telephoto) 13 MP, f/1.8, (wide)-
Video4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS)
Selfie camera
FeaturesHDRHDR
Single25 MP, f/1.98 MP, f/2.0, 22mm (wide), 1.22µm, no AF TOF 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor)
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Sound
3.5mm jack YesNo
35mm jackYesNo
Loudspeaker YesYes, with stereo speakers
Comms
Bluetooth5.0, A2DP, LE, EDR5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD
NFCYesYes
PositioningGPS, GLONASS, BDSGPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO
RadioFM radioNo
USBUSB Type-C 3.1, OTG, magnetic connectorUSB Type-C 3.1
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA
Features
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFace ID, accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
 Moto Mods snap-on accessories-
Battery
Charging-18W wired, PD2.0 Wireless
TypeLi-Ion, non-removableLi-Po 3700 mAh, non-removable
Misc
ColorsBlackClearly White, Just Black, Oh So Orange
Models-G020P, G020, GA01181-US, GA01182-US, GA01180-US
Price-About 180 EUR
Pricing
128GB 6GB RAM-$ 364.52
64GB 6GB RAM-$ 274.99
RENEWED-$ 149.00
Tests
Audio quality- Noise -93.9 / Crosstalk -94.1
Battery life- Endurance rating 73h
Camera- Photo / Video
Loudspeaker- Voice 80dB / Noise 78dB / Ring 88dB
Performance- AnTuTu: 323305 (v7), 403267 (v8) GeekBench: 10171 (v4.4), 2267 (v5.1) GFXBench: 21fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

Motorola Moto Z4 Force

  • Significantly lower price point
  • Modular design with Moto Mods
  • Snapdragon 855 performance

  • Inferior camera system
  • No wireless charging
  • Less frequent software updates

Google Pixel 4 XL

  • Exceptional camera quality
  • Clean Android experience with guaranteed updates
  • 90Hz display for smoother visuals

  • Higher price (though decreasing)
  • Battery life is average
  • No expandable storage

Display Comparison

Both devices utilize the Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 (7 nm) chipset, but display details are limited. Given the Pixel 4 XL’s higher original price point, it likely features a higher quality OLED panel with potentially better color accuracy and peak brightness. The Pixel 4 XL’s 6.3-inch display likely has a higher pixel density than the Z4 Force’s 6.4-inch screen. The Pixel 4 XL also benefits from a 90Hz refresh rate, not present on the Z4 Force, resulting in smoother scrolling and animations.

Camera Comparison

The Pixel 4 XL’s camera system is its standout feature. While both phones offer photo and video capabilities, Google’s computational photography expertise, including features like Night Sight and Super Res Zoom, significantly elevates image quality, particularly in low-light conditions. The Pixel 4 XL likely features a larger sensor and more advanced image processing algorithms. The Moto Z4 Force’s camera, while capable, cannot compete with the Pixel’s image processing prowess. Details on the Z4 Force’s sensor size and aperture are unavailable, but it’s reasonable to assume it’s less sophisticated.

Performance

Both the Motorola Moto Z4 Force and the Google Pixel 4 XL are powered by the same Octa-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (7 nm) chipset. This means CPU performance will be virtually identical for most tasks. However, the Pixel 4 XL’s 6GB of RAM, combined with Google’s optimized software, may result in slightly better multitasking and app retention. Thermal management is a key differentiator; Motorola’s design may prioritize sustained performance through more aggressive cooling, while Google’s may throttle earlier to maintain comfortable temperatures.

Battery Life

Both devices share an endurance rating of 73 hours, suggesting similar battery life despite potentially different capacities. The Pixel 4 XL supports 18W wired charging with PD2.0 and wireless charging, offering more convenient charging options than the Z4 Force, which lacks wireless charging. While the endurance rating is the same, the Pixel 4 XL’s optimized software and potentially more efficient display technology could translate to slightly longer real-world usage.

Buying Guide

Buy the Motorola Moto Z4 Force if you need a solid performer for everyday tasks and light gaming, and value affordability above all else. Its modular design also offers future upgrade potential. Buy the Google Pixel 4 XL if you prioritize exceptional camera performance, a clean Android experience with guaranteed updates, and don't mind a slightly older device.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Does the Pixel 4 XL's older chipset struggle with demanding modern games?
Despite being a generation older, the Snapdragon 855 in the Pixel 4 XL remains a capable performer for most mobile games. While it may not achieve the highest frame rates in the most graphically intensive titles compared to newer chipsets, it will provide a smooth and enjoyable gaming experience, especially with optimized game settings.
❓ How does the Moto Z4 Force's modularity impact long-term usability?
The Moto Z4 Force’s Moto Mods system allows for upgrades like improved speakers, battery packs, or even a projector. This extends the phone’s lifespan by allowing users to enhance functionality without replacing the entire device, offering a unique advantage over the Pixel 4 XL.
❓ Is the Pixel 4 XL's price drop making it a better value than when it launched?
Absolutely. The Pixel 4 XL’s significant price reduction has dramatically improved its value proposition. It now competes directly with mid-range phones while offering flagship-level camera performance and a premium software experience.