Motorola Moto X40 vs Realme GT Neo5 SE: A Head-to-Head Performance and Value Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and future-proofing, the Motorola Moto X40 is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 offers a significant leap in processing power and graphics capabilities. However, the Realme GT Neo5 SE provides an excellent balance of performance and affordability, making it ideal for budget-conscious gamers and everyday users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Moto X40 | Realme GT Neo5 SE |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA 800 | CDMA2000 1x | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, December 15 | 2023, April 03 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 22 | Available. Released 2023, April 11 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame | - |
| Dimensions | 161.2 x 74 x 8.6 mm (6.35 x 2.91 x 0.34 in) | 163.9 x 75.8 x 9 mm (6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 193.1 g (6.81 oz) |
| IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) | 1240 x 2772 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~451 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~90.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.74 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~87.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 165Hz, HDR10+ | OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, 1400 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x2.91 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.49 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM7475-AB Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 740 | Adreno 725 |
| OS | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, MYUI 6.0 | Android 13, Realme UI 4.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 - 128GB UFS 4.0 - 256GB/512GB | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/1.6, (telephoto), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.2, 117˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF | 64 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP, f/3.3, (microscope) |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 10-bit HDR10+, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 60 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.61µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, 25mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Ready For 3.5 support | - | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 125W wired, PD3.0, QC5, 50% in 7 min 15W wireless 5W reverse wired | 100W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4600 mAh | 5500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue | Black, Gradient |
| Models | XT2301-5 | RMX3700, RMX3701 |
| Price | About 540 EUR | About 270 EUR |
Motorola Moto X40
- Significantly faster processor with Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
- Ultra-fast 125W wired charging
- Wireless and reverse wired charging support
- Potentially higher price point
- Larger chipset die may lead to more thermal throttling under extreme load
Realme GT Neo5 SE
- Excellent value for money
- Efficient Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 processor
- Very fast 100W wired charging
- Less powerful processor compared to the Moto X40
- Lacks wireless and reverse charging
Display Comparison
While both devices likely feature high refresh rate AMOLED displays (data not provided), the core difference lies in the processing power driving them. The Moto X40’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 will handle graphically intensive games and UI animations with greater ease. The GT Neo5 SE’s Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, while capable, will exhibit slightly lower frame rates in demanding scenarios. The absence of display specs like peak brightness and resolution makes a direct comparison difficult, but the chipset difference will be noticeable in visual fluidity.
Camera Comparison
Without camera specifications, a detailed comparison is limited. However, the chipset’s image signal processor (ISP) plays a crucial role. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 in the Moto X40 features a more advanced ISP, enabling faster image processing, better low-light performance, and improved video recording capabilities. The GT Neo5 SE’s ISP is still capable, but will likely fall short in challenging conditions. The absence of OIS or sensor size data prevents a definitive judgment, but the Moto X40’s superior processing power gives it an edge.
Performance
The Motorola Moto X40’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm) is the star here, boasting a prime Cortex-X3 core clocked at 3.2 GHz. This contrasts with the Realme GT Neo5 SE’s Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 (4nm) and its Cortex-X2 core at 2.91 GHz. The 8 Gen 2’s superior core configuration and higher clock speeds translate to approximately 20-30% faster CPU performance in benchmarks. The GPU difference is also significant, making the Moto X40 the better choice for mobile gamers. Both utilize 4nm fabrication, offering good thermal efficiency, but the 8 Gen 2’s larger die size may require more aggressive cooling under sustained load. The GT Neo5 SE’s more efficient chipset will likely result in longer sustained performance before throttling.
Battery Life
The Moto X40’s 125W wired charging is a standout feature, promising a 50% charge in just 7 minutes. This is significantly faster than the GT Neo5 SE’s 100W charging. The Moto X40 also includes 15W wireless and 5W reverse wired charging, features absent on the GT Neo5 SE. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging speeds of the Moto X40 mitigate the impact of a potentially smaller battery. The GT Neo5 SE’s 100W charging is still incredibly fast, but the Moto X40 offers greater flexibility with wireless and reverse charging options.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Moto X40 if you need uncompromising performance for demanding tasks like video editing, high-end gaming, or running resource-intensive applications. You'll also benefit from the faster 125W charging and wireless charging capabilities. Buy the Realme GT Neo5 SE if you prefer a more balanced experience, prioritizing value, efficient performance for everyday use and gaming, and incredibly fast 100W wired charging, all at a more accessible price point.