Motorola Moto X40 vs. Edge 40 Pro: A Detailed Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Edge 40 Pro edges out the Moto X40 thanks to its brighter display, potentially improved camera capabilities (based on typical Edge Pro performance), and the addition of reverse wireless charging. Both offer blazing-fast charging and top-tier performance, but the Edge 40 Pro provides a more premium overall experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Moto X40 | Motorola Edge 40 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA 800 | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, December 15 | 2023, April 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 22 | Available. Released 2023, April 04 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 161.2 x 74 x 8.6 mm (6.35 x 2.91 x 0.34 in) | 161.2 x 74 x 8.6 mm (6.35 x 2.91 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~90.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~90.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 165Hz, HDR10+ | OLED, 1B colors, 165Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 740 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, MYUI 6.0 | Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 - 128GB UFS 4.0 - 256GB/512GB | UFS 4.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR | Dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/1.6, (telephoto), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.2, 117˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/1.6, (telephoto), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.2, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 10-bit HDR10+, gyro-EIS | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 10-bit HDR10+, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 60 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.61µm | 60 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.61µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG, DisplayPort 1.4 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Ready For 3.5 support | Ready For 3.5 support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 125W wired, PD3.0, QC5, 50% in 7 min 15W wireless 5W reverse wired | 125W wired, PD3.0, QC5, 50% in 6 min, 100% in 23 min 15W wireless 5W reverse wired 5W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4600 mAh | Li-Po 4600 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue | Interstellar Black, Lunar Blue |
| Models | XT2301-5 | - |
| Price | About 540 EUR | € 313.87 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 117h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -22.6 LUFS (Excellent) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 1273764 (v9) GeekBench: 4896 (v5.1), 5352 (v6) GFXBench: 112fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Motorola Moto X40
- Blazing-fast 125W wired charging
- Powerful Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset
- Competitive price (likely)
- Sleek design
- Potentially less advanced camera system
- No reverse wireless charging
- Display brightness may be lower than Edge 40 Pro
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
- Brighter 1050 nits display
- Potentially superior camera system
- Reverse wireless charging
- Excellent battery life (117h endurance rating)
- Premium design and build quality
- Higher price point
- May have slightly less optimized software (depending on updates)
Display Comparison
Both phones feature excellent OLED displays with a 120Hz refresh rate. However, the Edge 40 Pro's measured 1050 nits peak brightness gives it a significant advantage in outdoor visibility. The Edge 40 Pro also boasts an 'infinite' contrast ratio, suggesting deeper blacks and richer colors, though this is a nominal value. The Moto X40's display is still very good, but the Edge 40 Pro takes the crown here.
Camera Comparison
While both phones are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, the Edge 40 Pro typically offers a more advanced camera system in Motorola's lineup. Expect improved image processing, potentially better low-light performance, and more versatile shooting modes. The Moto X40's camera is still capable, but the Edge 40 Pro is likely to provide a more compelling photographic experience.
Performance
Powered by the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, both phones deliver exceptional performance. Expect smooth multitasking, lag-free gaming, and effortless handling of demanding applications. Real-world performance differences are likely to be minimal, as both utilize the same chipset and CPU configuration. Software optimization will play a larger role in the user experience.
Battery Life
The Edge 40 Pro boasts an impressive endurance rating of 117h, suggesting excellent battery life. While the Moto X40's battery capacity isn't explicitly stated, both phones support 125W wired charging, enabling incredibly fast top-ups. The Edge 40 Pro also adds reverse wireless charging, a convenient feature for topping up accessories.
Buying Guide
The Moto X40 is ideal for users prioritizing raw performance and incredibly fast wired charging at a potentially more accessible price point. The Edge 40 Pro is for those seeking a premium design, a vibrant display, and a more feature-rich experience, including reverse wireless charging, even if it comes at a slightly higher cost.