Motorola Moto X30 Pro vs. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra: A Deep Dive Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing a complete package – a stunning display, a versatile camera, and long-term software support – the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra remains the superior choice. However, the Motorola Moto X30 Pro is a compelling option for power users who prioritize charging speed and raw performance, and are willing to compromise on some software and camera features.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Moto X30 Pro | Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (7CA) Cat20 2000/200 Mbps, 5G (5+ Gbps DL) |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA 800 / 1900 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 66, 71, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, August 11 | 2022, February 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, August 11 | Available. Released 2022, February 25 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus+), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus+), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 161.7 x 73.5 x 8.4 mm (6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 in) | 163.3 x 77.9 x 8.9 mm (6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) |
| Weight | 198.5 g (7.02 oz) | 228 g / 229 g (mmWave) (8.04 oz) |
| Splash and dust resistant | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Armor aluminum frame with tougher drop and scratch resistance (advertised) Stylus, 2.8ms latency (Bluetooth integration, accelerometer, gyro) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) | 1440 x 3088 pixels, 19.3:9 ratio (~500 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~91.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.8 inches, 114.7 cm2 (~90.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM), 1250 nits (peak) | Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1750 nits (peak) |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x2.8 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) - EuropeOcta-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) - ROW |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | Exynos 2200 (4 nm) - EuropeQualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) - ROW |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Xclipse 920 - EuropeAdreno 730 - ROW |
| OS | Android 12, MYUI 4.0 | Android 12, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 8 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR | Laser AF, LED flash, auto-HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 108 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.33", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 10 MP, f/2.4, 70mm (telephoto), 1/3.52", 1.12µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 10 MP, f/4.9, 230mm (periscope telephoto), 1/3.52", 1.12µm, PDAF, OIS, 10x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, Super Steady video |
| Triple | 200 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/1.22", 0.64µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.2, 117˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF 12 MP, f/1.6, (telephoto), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom | - |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, HDR10+, stereo sound rec., gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 60 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 0.64µm | 40 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.82", 0.7µm, PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 32-bit/384kHz audio Tuned by AKG | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Ready For 3.5 support | Samsung DeX, Samsung Wireless DeX (desktop experience support) Bixby natural language commands and dictation Samsung Pay (Visa, MasterCard certified) Ultra Wideband (UWB) support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 125W wired, 50% in 7 min, 100% in 19 min 50W wireless | 45W wired, PD3.0 15W wireless (Qi) 4.5W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4610 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | White, Black | Phantom Black, White, Burgundy, Green, Graphite, Red, Sky Blue, Bora Purple |
| Models | XT2241-1 | SM-S908B, SM-S908B/DS, SM-S908U, SM-S908U1, SM-S908W, SM-S908N, SM-S9080, SM-S908E, SM-S908E/DS |
| Price | About 550 EUR | € 397.07 / $ 269.98 / £ 304.99 / ₹ 63,899 |
| SAR | - | 1.18 W/kg (head) 0.98 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.05 W/kg (head) 1.58 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 108h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -27.3 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 968359 (v9) GeekBench: 3657 (v5.1) GFXBench: 37fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Motorola Moto X30 Pro
- Blazing-fast 125W wired charging
- Powerful Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 processor
- Potentially better thermal management for sustained performance
- Less refined software experience
- Camera system lacks the versatility of the S22 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
- Stunning and bright display
- Versatile and high-quality camera system
- Long-term software support and ecosystem integration
- Slower charging speeds
- Exynos variant may suffer from thermal throttling
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured 1266 nits, compared to an unstated peak brightness for the Moto X30 Pro. While the Moto X30 Pro’s display specs are less detailed, the S22 Ultra’s infinite contrast ratio and likely LTPO technology (based on Samsung’s flagship history) suggest superior dynamic range and adaptive refresh rate capabilities for smoother scrolling and improved power efficiency. The S22 Ultra’s display is geared towards content consumption and outdoor visibility, while the Moto X30 Pro’s display, though likely excellent, lacks the quantifiable advantages.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems, but approach photography differently. The S22 Ultra’s camera system is renowned for its versatility, offering a wide range of focal lengths and advanced image processing. While the Moto X30 Pro’s camera specs are not detailed beyond 'Photo / Video', its focus appears to be on a high-resolution primary sensor (likely the 200MP sensor it's known for). The S22 Ultra’s image processing prioritizes natural colors and detail, while the Moto X30 Pro may lean towards more saturated and sharpened images. The S22 Ultra’s superior optical image stabilization (OIS) and software features likely provide a more consistent and refined photography experience.
Performance
The Motorola Moto X30 Pro utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, a 4nm chip known for its efficiency and performance gains over the original Snapdragon 8 Gen 1. The S22 Ultra, however, comes in two variants: an Exynos 2200 (Europe) and a Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (ROW). The Exynos 2200 has faced criticism regarding thermal throttling, potentially limiting sustained performance compared to the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 in the Moto X30 Pro. While both phones feature similar CPU core configurations (1x Cortex-X2, 3x Cortex-A710, 4x Cortex-A510), the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1’s improved efficiency and the Moto X30 Pro’s potentially better thermal design could translate to longer gaming sessions without significant performance drops. The Moto X30 Pro’s chipset is a clear advantage for sustained performance.
Battery Life
Both devices have an endurance rating of 108h, suggesting similar overall battery life despite the Moto X30 Pro’s unspecified battery capacity. However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The Moto X30 Pro’s 125W wired charging is a game-changer, achieving 50% charge in just 7 minutes and 100% in 19 minutes. The S22 Ultra’s 45W wired charging, while supporting PD3.0, is significantly slower. The Moto X30 Pro also offers 50W wireless charging, dwarfing the S22 Ultra’s 15W Qi wireless charging. For users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly, the Moto X30 Pro is the clear winner.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Moto X30 Pro if you need the absolute fastest charging available, prioritize peak CPU performance for demanding tasks, and are comfortable with a less polished software experience. Buy the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G if you prefer a more refined and feature-rich experience, a class-leading camera system, and the peace of mind that comes with Samsung’s extensive software support and ecosystem.