Motorola Moto X30 Pro vs Oppo Find X5 Pro: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Moto X30 Pro boasts significantly faster charging and a slightly more powerful chipset. However, the Find X5 Pro excels in battery life and potentially camera quality (depending on region). Ultimately, the best choice depends on your priorities: speed and charging vs. endurance and potentially superior photography.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Moto X30 Pro | Oppo Find X5 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - Global |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 18, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - Global |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA 800 / 1900 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, August 11 | 2022, February 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, August 11 | Available. Released 2022, March 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), ceramic back or eco leather back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 161.7 x 73.5 x 8.4 mm (6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 in) | 163.7 x 73.9 x 8.5 or 8.8 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 198.5 g (7.02 oz) | 218 g or 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| Splash and dust resistant | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) | 1440 x 3216 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~525 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~91.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM), 1250 nits (peak) | LTPO2 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, BT.2020, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) - GlobalOcta-core (1x3.05 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) - China |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) - GlobalMediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) - China |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 730 - GlobalMali-G710 MC10 - China |
| OS | Android 12, MYUI 4.0 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR | Hasselblad Color Calibration, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 200 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/1.22", 0.64µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.2, 117˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF 12 MP, f/1.6, (telephoto), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom | 50 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS (3-axis sensor-shift, 2-axis lens-shift) 13 MP, f/2.4, 52mm (telephoto), 1/3.4", 2x optical zoom, PDAF 50 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 110˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | Panorama |
| Single | 60 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 0.64µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Ready For 3.5 support | Oppo Find X5 Pro Dimensity model has no MariSilicon X image chip, 5-axis OIS and Hasselblad’s color calibration | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 125W wired, 50% in 7 min, 100% in 19 min 50W wireless | 80W wired, PD, 50% in 12 min 50W wireless, 100% in 47 min 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4610 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | White, Black | Ceramic Black, Ceramic White, Blue (eco leather) |
| Models | XT2241-1 | PFEM10, CPH2305, PFFM20 |
| Price | About 550 EUR | € 449.00 / $ 430.24 / £ 1,049.00 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 101h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.7 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 1012896 (v9) GeekBench: 3433 (v5.1) GFXBench: 44fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Motorola Moto X30 Pro
- Blazing-fast 125W charging
- Powerful Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset
- High 144Hz refresh rate display
- Competitive price
- Camera may not be as refined as Find X5 Pro
- Battery life not as long as Find X5 Pro
- Software updates can be inconsistent
Oppo Find X5 Pro
- Exceptional battery life
- Premium design and build quality
- Potentially superior camera system (especially global variant)
- 10W reverse wireless charging
- Slower charging speeds
- Higher price point
- Software experience can be polarizing
Display Comparison
Both phones feature excellent OLED displays, but the Find X5 Pro's 762 nits peak brightness gives it an edge in outdoor visibility. The Find X5 Pro's 'Infinite' contrast ratio (though nominal) suggests deep blacks and vibrant colors. The Moto X30 Pro's display is also excellent, offering smooth 144Hz refresh rate for fluid scrolling and gaming.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is complex. The Find X5 Pro is expected to have a more refined camera system, particularly in image processing. The global variant with Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 and the Chinese variant with Dimensity 9000 both offer excellent camera capabilities. The Moto X30 Pro's camera is capable, but may not match the Find X5 Pro's overall quality and consistency. Low-light performance is a key area to watch.
Performance
The Moto X30 Pro's Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 holds a clear advantage over the Find X5 Pro's Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (or Dimensity 9000 in China). The 8+ Gen 1 is known for its improved efficiency and slightly better performance in demanding tasks. Both phones offer smooth multitasking and responsive gaming experiences, but the X30 Pro has a slight edge.
Battery Life
The Oppo Find X5 Pro dominates in battery life, boasting an impressive endurance rating of 101 hours. The Moto X30 Pro's battery life is respectable, but falls short of the Find X5 Pro's longevity. However, the Moto X30 Pro's 125W charging more than compensates for this difference, allowing for incredibly fast top-ups.
Buying Guide
The Motorola Moto X30 Pro is ideal for users who prioritize blazing-fast charging, raw performance, and a more affordable price point. The Oppo Find X5 Pro is a better fit for those who value exceptional battery life, a refined design, and potentially a more consistent camera experience (especially the global variant).