Motorola Moto X30 Pro vs. Google Pixel 7 Pro: A Deep Dive into Performance and Features
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw speed, gaming, and incredibly fast charging, the Motorola Moto X30 Pro is the clear winner. However, the Google Pixel 7 Pro excels in camera versatility, software polish, and AI-driven features, making it the better choice for photography enthusiasts and those deeply integrated into the Google ecosystem.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Moto X30 Pro | Google Pixel 7 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66, 71 - GE2AE |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78, 257, 258, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - GE2AE |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA 800 / 1900 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 75, 76, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GP4BC | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, August 11 | 2022, October 06 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, August 11 | Available. Released 2022, October 13 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 161.7 x 73.5 x 8.4 mm (6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 in) | 162.9 x 76.6 x 8.9 mm (6.41 x 3.02 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 198.5 g (7.02 oz) | 212 g (7.48 oz) |
| Splash and dust resistant | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~512 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~91.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 110.6 cm2 (~88.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM), 1250 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM), 1500 nits (peak) |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| OS | Android 12, MYUI 4.0 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 10.8 MP, f/2.2, 21mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.22µm |
| Triple | 200 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/1.22", 0.64µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.2, 117˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF 12 MP, f/1.6, (telephoto), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom | 50 MP, f/1.9, 25mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/3.5, 120mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.55", 0.7µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 126˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.9", 1.25µm, AF |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS, 10-bit HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 60 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 0.64µm | 10.8 MP, f/2.2, 21mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.22µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Ready For 3.5 support | Ultra Wideband (UWB) support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 125W wired, 50% in 7 min, 100% in 19 min 50W wireless | 23W wired, PD3.0, 50% in 30 min 23W wireless Reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4610 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | White, Black | Obsidian, Snow, Hazel |
| Models | XT2241-1 | GP4BC, GE2AE, GFE4J |
| Price | About 550 EUR | € 248.84 / $ 204.00 / £ 259.99 / ₹ 36,999 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 83h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.8 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 796369 (v9) GeekBench: 3187 (v5.1) GFXBench: 34fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Motorola Moto X30 Pro
- Incredibly fast 125W wired charging
- Powerful Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 processor
- Potentially superior gaming performance
- 50W Wireless Charging
- Software updates may be less frequent
- Camera processing may not match Pixel's
Google Pixel 7 Pro
- Exceptional camera with Google’s computational photography
- Smooth and refined software experience
- AI-powered features (Magic Eraser, Live Translate)
- Guaranteed software updates
- Slower 23W wired charging
- Tensor G2 may not match Snapdragon in raw power
Display Comparison
The Pixel 7 Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 1090 nits, providing excellent visibility in direct sunlight. While the Moto X30 Pro’s display specs aren’t provided, Motorola typically utilizes high-quality panels. The Pixel 7 Pro’s infinite contrast ratio (nominal) ensures deep blacks and vibrant colors. Both likely employ high refresh rate panels, but the Pixel 7 Pro’s LTPO technology dynamically adjusts the refresh rate for improved efficiency. The Pixel 7 Pro’s display is optimized for content consumption and outdoor use.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are advertised as having excellent photo and video capabilities, but their approaches differ. The Pixel 7 Pro leverages Google’s renowned computational photography, enhancing images through software algorithms. While sensor sizes aren’t specified, the Pixel 7 Pro’s image processing excels in dynamic range and low-light performance. The Moto X30 Pro’s camera system, while capable, relies more on hardware specifications. The Pixel 7 Pro’s video stabilization and cinematic modes are likely more refined. The Moto X30 Pro may offer more manual control options for experienced photographers.
Performance
The Motorola Moto X30 Pro’s Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm) is a powerhouse, featuring an octa-core configuration with a prime Cortex-X2 core clocked at 3.19 GHz. This contrasts with the Google Pixel 7 Pro’s Tensor G2 (5nm) which utilizes a different core arrangement – 2x Cortex-X1 at 2.85 GHz. The 4nm process of the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 generally offers better thermal efficiency than the 5nm Tensor G2, potentially leading to less throttling during sustained workloads. The Moto X30 Pro is likely to deliver superior GPU performance, benefiting gamers. However, the Tensor G2 excels in AI and machine learning tasks, powering features like Magic Eraser and Live Translate. The Pixel 7 Pro’s performance is optimized for Google’s software and services.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 83 hours, suggesting comparable overall battery life despite differing battery capacities (not specified for the Moto X30 Pro). However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The Motorola Moto X30 Pro’s 125W wired charging can replenish the battery to 100% in just 19 minutes, and 50% in 7 minutes. The Pixel 7 Pro’s 23W wired charging takes approximately 30 minutes to reach 50%. The Moto X30 Pro also supports 50W wireless charging, while the Pixel 7 Pro offers 23W wireless charging and reverse wireless charging. The Moto X30 Pro is the clear winner for users who prioritize rapid charging.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Moto X30 Pro if you need uncompromising performance for demanding tasks like gaming and video editing, and if minimizing charging downtime is critical. Its 125W charging is a game-changer. Buy the Google Pixel 7 Pro if you prefer a seamless software experience, exceptional camera capabilities with Google’s computational photography, and a phone that learns and adapts to your usage patterns through its Tensor G2 AI.