The Motorola Moto X Play and Oppo R7 Plus were both popular mid-range contenders, offering compelling features at accessible prices. But which one truly delivered the better experience? We're diving deep into a head-to-head comparison to help you decide.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo R7 Plus edges out the Moto X Play thanks to its superior charging speed, slightly better display visibility in sunlight, and marginally longer battery life. Both offer solid performance, but Oppo's refinements give it a slight advantage for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 - XT1562 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - Global, Taiwan |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 19, 20, 28, 38, 41 - XT1562 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 40 - Global |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - India | 1, 2, 4, 7, 17 - USA |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2015, July. Released 2015, August | 2015, May. Released 2015, May |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 148 x 75 x 10.9 mm (5.83 x 2.95 x 0.43 in) | 158 x 82 x 7.8 mm (6.22 x 3.23 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Micro-SIM |
| Weight | 169 g (5.96 oz) | 192 g (6.77 oz) |
| | Splash and dust resistant | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 1920 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) | 1080 x 1920 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~367 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.5 inches, 82.6 cm2 (~74.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.0 inches, 99.2 cm2 (~76.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.0 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.0 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm MSM8939 Snapdragon 615 (28 nm) | Qualcomm MSM8939 Snapdragon 615 (28 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 405 | Adreno 405 |
| OS | Android 5.1.1 (Lollipop), upgradable to 7.1.1 (Nougat) | Android 5.1.1 (Lollipop), ColorOS 2.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 16GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 2GB RAM | 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM |
| | eMMC 4.5 | eMMC 4.5 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, panorama | Laser AF, Schneider-Kreuznach optics, dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 21 MP, f/2.0, 1/2.4", 1.1µm, PDAF | 13 MP, f/2.2, 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@60fps, 720p@120fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2 | 8 MP, f/2.4 |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.0, A2DP, LE, aptX | 4.0, LE |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | microUSB 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, dual-band, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | 20W wired, 75% in 30 min |
| Type | Li-Ion 3630 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4100 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, White | Golden, Silver |
| Models | XT1562, XT1563, XT1564 | R7plusf |
| Price | About 240 EUR | About 430 EUR |
| SAR | 0.56 W/kg (head) 0.80 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | 0.49 W/kg (head) 0.68 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality |
Noise -93.8dB / Crosstalk -95.2dB |
Noise -94.3dB / Crosstalk -94.9dB |
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 83h
|
Endurance rating 94h
|
| Camera |
Photo / Video |
Photo / Video |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: 1520:1 (nominal), 3.222 (sunlight) |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal), 3.499 (sunlight) |
| Loudspeaker |
Voice 69dB / Noise 66dB / Ring 75dB
|
Voice 73dB / Noise 72dB / Ring 79dB
|
| Performance |
Basemark OS II 2.0: 809Basemark X: 5032 |
Basemark OS II 2.0: 968Basemark X: 5349 |
| OUR TESTS |
|---|
| Audio quality | Noise -93.8dB / Crosstalk -95.2dB | Noise -94.3dB / Crosstalk -94.9dB |
| Battery (old) | Endurance rating 83h | Endurance rating 94h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: 1520:1 (nominal), 3.222 (sunlight) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal), 3.499 (sunlight) |
| Loudspeaker | Voice 69dB / Noise 66dB / Ring 75dB | Voice 73dB / Noise 72dB / Ring 79dB |
| Performance | Basemark OS II 2.0: 809Basemark X: 5032 | Basemark OS II 2.0: 968Basemark X: 5349 |
Motorola Moto X Play
- Clean Android experience
- Excellent battery life
- Water-repellent coating
- Stock Android updates
- Slightly dated design
- Average camera performance
- Slower charging
Oppo R7 Plus
- Fast charging (20W)
- Brighter display
- Slightly faster CPU
- Premium design
- 'Infinite' contrast ratio is marketing
- Software bloatware (typical of Oppo at the time)
- Less frequent software updates
Display Comparison
Both phones feature 5.5-inch displays, but the Oppo R7 Plus boasts an 'Infinite' contrast ratio (likely a marketing term, but suggests strong blacks) and a slightly higher sunlight readability score (3.499 vs 3.222). While both offer good viewing angles, the Oppo's display generally appears more vibrant. The Moto X Play's display is perfectly adequate, but the R7 Plus has a slight edge.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is comparable. Both phones offer decent image quality in good lighting conditions. Low-light performance is average for the time. The Oppo R7 Plus might have slightly better post-processing, resulting in more vibrant colors, but the Moto X Play's camera is no slouch. Video recording is standard for both.
Performance
Both devices utilize the Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 chipset, but the Oppo R7 Plus has a slightly faster CPU clock speed (4x1.5 GHz vs 4x1.7 GHz) for the high-performance cores. In real-world usage, the difference is minimal, and both phones handle everyday tasks and moderate gaming smoothly. However, the Oppo's slightly better thermal management might prevent throttling during extended gaming sessions.
Battery Life
The Oppo R7 Plus takes a clear lead in battery life, boasting an endurance rating of 94 hours compared to the Moto X Play's 83 hours. More importantly, the Oppo R7 Plus's 20W fast charging (75% in 30 minutes) is a game-changer, significantly reducing downtime.
Buying Guide
The Motorola Moto X Play is a good choice for users prioritizing a clean Android experience and excellent battery life on a budget. The Oppo R7 Plus is ideal for those who value fast charging, a brighter display, and a slightly more premium feel.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better software support?
The Moto X Play generally received quicker and more consistent software updates due to Motorola's commitment to stock Android.
❓ Is the Oppo R7 Plus worth it if I value fast charging?
Absolutely! The 20W fast charging is a significant advantage over the Moto X Play's slower charging speeds.