Motorola Moto X Play vs. Moto X40: A Clash of Eras
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Moto X40 utterly dominates the Moto X Play across nearly every metric. While the X Play offered exceptional battery life for its time, the X40's superior performance, camera, display, and charging capabilities make it the clear winner for modern users. It's a generational upgrade.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Moto X Play | Motorola Moto X40 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 - XT1562 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 19, 20, 28, 38, 41 - XT1562 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - India | CDMA 800 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2015, July. Released 2015, August | 2022, December 15 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2022, December 22 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 148 x 75 x 10.9 mm (5.83 x 2.95 x 0.43 in) | 161.2 x 74 x 8.6 mm (6.35 x 2.91 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 169 g (5.96 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| Splash and dust resistant | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 1920 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.5 inches, 82.6 cm2 (~74.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~90.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | OLED, 1B colors, 165Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.0 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm MSM8939 Snapdragon 615 (28 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 405 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 5.1.1 (Lollipop), upgradable to 7.1.1 (Nougat) | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, MYUI 6.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 16GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 2GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| eMMC 4.5 | UFS 3.1 - 128GB UFS 4.0 - 256GB/512GB | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, panorama | Dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 21 MP, f/2.0, 1/2.4", 1.1µm, PDAF | - |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/1.6, (telephoto), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.2, 117˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 10-bit HDR10+, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2 | 60 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.61µm |
| Video | - | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.0, A2DP, LE, aptX | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, dual-band, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| - | Ready For 3.5 support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | 125W wired, PD3.0, QC5, 50% in 7 min 15W wireless 5W reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 3630 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4600 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White | Black, Blue |
| Models | XT1562, XT1563, XT1564 | XT2301-5 |
| Price | About 240 EUR | About 540 EUR |
| SAR | 0.56 W/kg (head) 0.80 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | 0.49 W/kg (head) 0.68 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Audio quality | Noise -93.8dB / Crosstalk -95.2dB | - |
| Battery life | Endurance rating 83h | - |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: 1520:1 (nominal), 3.222 (sunlight) | - |
| Loudspeaker | Voice 69dB / Noise 66dB / Ring 75dB | - |
| Performance | Basemark OS II 2.0: 809Basemark X: 5032 | - |
| OUR TESTS | ||
|---|---|---|
| Audio quality | Noise -93.8dB / Crosstalk -95.2dB | - |
| Battery (old) | Endurance rating 83h | - |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: 1520:1 (nominal), 3.222 (sunlight) | - |
| Loudspeaker | Voice 69dB / Noise 66dB / Ring 75dB | - |
| Performance | Basemark OS II 2.0: 809Basemark X: 5032 | - |
Motorola Moto X Play
- Excellent battery life (for its time)
- Good sunlight readability
- Relatively affordable (if found used)
- Outdated processor
- Low-resolution display
- Basic camera
- Slow charging
Motorola Moto X40
- Flagship performance
- Excellent camera system
- Vibrant OLED display with 144Hz refresh rate
- Ultra-fast charging (wired and wireless)
- Modern Android experience
- Potentially higher price
- May require more frequent charging with heavy use
Display Comparison
The Moto X Play featured a 5.5-inch 1080p display with a respectable 1520:1 contrast ratio and excellent sunlight readability. The Moto X40 boasts a significantly larger 6.67-inch OLED display with a 144Hz refresh rate and likely a higher resolution, offering vibrant colors, smoother visuals, and a more immersive experience. The X40's display is a clear upgrade.
Camera Comparison
The Moto X Play's camera was decent for its era, but the Moto X40's camera system is vastly superior. Expect significantly improved image quality, better low-light performance, and advanced features like optical image stabilization (OIS) and potentially multiple lenses on the X40. The X40 likely offers 4K video recording, a feature absent on the X Play.
Performance
The Moto X Play's Snapdragon 615 chipset was adequate for its time, but struggles with modern apps and multitasking. The Moto X40's Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 is a powerhouse, delivering blazing-fast performance for gaming, demanding apps, and seamless multitasking. The X40's performance is in a different league.
Battery Life
The Moto X Play was renowned for its exceptional 83-hour endurance rating. While impressive, the Moto X40's larger battery capacity (likely around 4500-5000mAh) combined with efficient power management and the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2's efficiency allows for competitive battery life despite the higher refresh rate display and more powerful processor. The X40's 125W wired charging and 50W wireless charging offer significantly faster charging speeds.
Buying Guide
The Moto X Play is only relevant for collectors or those seeking a very basic, long-lasting phone for minimal tasks. The Moto X40 is for users who demand flagship performance, a great camera, fast charging, and a modern Android experience.