Motorola Moto X (2nd Gen) vs. Moto X40: A Clash of Generations
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Moto X40 is the clear winner, offering a massive upgrade in performance, charging speed, and camera capabilities. While the Moto X (2nd Gen) holds nostalgic value and offered impressive battery life for its time, the X40's modern features and power make it the superior choice for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Moto X (2nd Gen) | Motorola Moto X40 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - all versions | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - EU, AT&T, Verizon | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 17 - XT1097 AT&T, XT1095 T-Mobile | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 3, 7, 20 - India | CDMA 800 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2014, September. Released 2014, September | 2022, December 15 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2022, December 22 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 140.8 x 72.4 x 10 mm (5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 in) | 161.2 x 74 x 8.6 mm (6.35 x 2.91 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 144 g (5.08 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| Water resistant | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 1920 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~424 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.2 inches, 74.5 cm2 (~73.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~90.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED | OLED, 1B colors, 165Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 2.5 GHz Krait 400 | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm MSM8974AC Snapdragon 801 (28 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 330 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 4.4.4 (KitKat), upgradable to 6.0 (Marshmallow) | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, MYUI 6.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 16GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 2GB RAM, 64GB 2GB RAM (AT&T, T-Mobile) | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| eMMC 5.0 | UFS 3.1 - 128GB UFS 4.0 - 256GB/512GB | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR | Dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.2, 29mm (standard), 1/3.1", 1.13µm, AF | - |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/1.6, (telephoto), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.2, 117˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, HDR | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 10-bit HDR10+, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 2 MP, f/2.2 | 60 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.61µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.0, A2DP, EDR, LE, aptX | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, DLNA, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer, temperature | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| - | Ready For 3.5 support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 15W wired, QC2 | 125W wired, PD3.0, QC5, 50% in 7 min 15W wireless 5W reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 2300 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4600 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White | Black, Blue |
| Models | XT1097, XT1096, XT1095, XT1092, XT1085, XT1093 | XT2301-5 |
| Price | About 320 EUR | About 540 EUR |
| SAR | 1.46 W/kg (head) 1.27 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | 0.49 W/kg (head) 0.69 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Audio quality | Noise -93.5dB / Crosstalk -93.8dB | - |
| Battery life | Endurance rating 48h | - |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Loudspeaker | Voice 66dB / Noise 66dB / Ring 72dB | - |
| Performance | Basemark OS II 2.0: 1176Basemark X: 11855 | - |
| OUR TESTS | ||
|---|---|---|
| Audio quality | Noise -93.5dB / Crosstalk -93.8dB | - |
| Battery (old) | Endurance rating 48h | - |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Loudspeaker | Voice 66dB / Noise 66dB / Ring 72dB | - |
| Performance | Basemark OS II 2.0: 1176Basemark X: 11855 | - |
Motorola Moto X (2nd Gen)
- Excellent battery life (48h)
- Compact and comfortable design
- Reliable performance for basic tasks
- Affordable (used market)
- Outdated processor
- Lower resolution display
- Limited camera capabilities
- Slow charging
Motorola Moto X40
- Blazing-fast Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 processor
- Stunning high-refresh-rate display
- Exceptional camera system
- Ultra-fast 125W charging
- Wireless and reverse wired charging
- Potentially higher price point
- Battery life may not match the X (2nd Gen) despite fast charging
- Larger size may not suit all users
Display Comparison
The Moto X40 boasts a significantly superior display. It likely features an OLED panel with a high refresh rate (likely 144Hz), offering vibrant colors, deep blacks, and smooth scrolling. The Moto X (2nd Gen) had a smaller LCD display with a standard refresh rate, which feels dated by comparison. Expect better outdoor visibility and overall visual clarity on the X40.
Camera Comparison
While both phones offer 'Photo / Video' capabilities, the Moto X40's camera system is expected to be significantly more advanced. Expect a higher resolution main sensor, improved image processing, better low-light performance, and potentially features like optical image stabilization (OIS). The X40 likely supports 4K video recording, whereas the X (2nd Gen) may be limited to 1080p.
Performance
The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 in the Moto X40 is a generational leap over the Snapdragon 801 in the Moto X (2nd Gen). The X40 delivers vastly superior processing power, enabling smoother multitasking, faster app loading, and effortless handling of demanding games. The X40's octa-core CPU and advanced architecture provide a noticeable performance advantage.
Battery Life
The Moto X (2nd Gen) was known for its impressive 48-hour endurance rating. The Moto X40, despite likely having a larger, higher-resolution display, benefits from more efficient components and incredibly fast 125W charging. While the X40's battery capacity might be similar, the charging speed provides a significant advantage, allowing for a full charge in under 30 minutes.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Motorola Moto X (2nd Gen)? Those seeking a budget-friendly, reliable phone for basic tasks and who prioritize long battery life. Who should buy the Motorola Moto X40? Users demanding top-tier performance, a stunning display, fast charging, and a high-quality camera experience.