Motorola Showdown: Moto X (2nd Gen) vs. Edge 30 Fusion

Motorola has a rich history of producing reliable and feature-packed smartphones. Today, we're revisiting a beloved classic, the Moto X (2nd Gen), and comparing it to a more recent contender, the Edge 30 Fusion. This comparison will help you decide which Motorola best suits your needs and budget.

Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion is the clear winner. While the Moto X (2nd Gen) holds a nostalgic charm and impressive battery life for its time, the Edge 30 Fusion boasts a significantly faster processor, a brighter display, a more advanced camera system, and incredibly fast charging, making it the superior choice for modern users.

PHONES
Phone Names	Motorola Moto X (2nd Gen)	Motorola Edge 30 Fusion

Network
2G bands	GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - all versions	GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bands	HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - EU, AT&T, Verizon	HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International
4G bands	2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 17 - XT1097 AT&T, XT1095 T-Mobile	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 - International
5G bands	-	1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International
Speed	HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps	HSPA, LTE, 5G
Technology	GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE	GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G
	1, 3, 7, 20 - India	1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - PRC

Launch
Announced	2014, September. Released 2014, September	2022, September 08
Status	Discontinued	Available. Released 2022, September 08

Body
Build	-	Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame
Dimensions	140.8 x 72.4 x 10 mm (5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 in)	158.5 x 72 x 7.5 mm or 7.7 mm
SIM	Nano-SIM	· Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight	144 g (5.08 oz)	168 g / 175 g (5.93 oz)
	Water resistant	Splash and dust resistant

Display
Protection	Corning Gorilla Glass 3	Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Resolution	1080 x 1920 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~424 ppi density)	1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density)
Size	5.2 inches, 74.5 cm2 (~73.1% screen-to-body ratio)	6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.8% screen-to-body ratio)
Type	AMOLED	P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1100 nits (peak)

Platform
CPU	Quad-core 2.5 GHz Krait 400	Octa-core (1x2.99 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55)
Chipset	Qualcomm MSM8974AC Snapdragon 801 (28 nm)	Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888+ 5G (5 nm)
GPU	Adreno 330	Adreno 660
OS	Android 4.4.4 (KitKat), upgradable to 6.0 (Marshmallow)	Android 12, upgradable to Android 14

Memory
Card slot	No	No
Internal	16GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 2GB RAM, 64GB 2GB RAM (AT&T, T-Mobile)	128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM
	eMMC 5.0	UFS 3.1

Main Camera
Features	Dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR	LED flash, panorama, HDR
Single	13 MP, f/2.2, 29mm (standard), 1/3.1", 1.13µm, AF	-
Triple	-	50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm, AF Auxiliary lens
Video	4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, HDR	8K@30fps, 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS

Selfie camera
Features	-	HDR
Single	2 MP, f/2.2	32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, AF
Video	1080p@30fps	4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps

Sound
3.5mm jack	Yes	No
35mm jack	Yes	No
Loudspeaker	Yes	Yes, with stereo speakers

Comms
Bluetooth	4.0, A2DP, EDR, LE, aptX	5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive
NFC	Yes	Yes
Positioning	GPS, GLONASS	GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO
Radio	No	No
USB	microUSB 2.0, OTG	USB Type-C 3.1, OTG
WLAN	Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, DLNA, hotspot	Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct

Features
Sensors	Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer, temperature	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
	-	Ready For 3.5 support

Battery
Charging	15W wired, QC2	68W wired, 50% in 10 min
Type	Li-Ion 2300 mAh, non-removable	Li-Po 4400 mAh

Misc
Colors	Black, White	Neptune Blue, Cosmic Grey, Solar Gold, Aurora White, Viva Magenta
Models	XT1097, XT1096, XT1095, XT1092, XT1085, XT1093	XT2243-1
Price	About 320 EUR	About 150 EUR
SAR	1.46 W/kg (head) 1.27 W/kg (body)	-
SAR EU	0.49 W/kg (head) 0.69 W/kg (body)	-

Tests
Audio quality	Noise -93.5dB / Crosstalk -93.8dB	-
Battery life	Endurance rating 48h	Endurance rating 101h
Camera	Photo / Video	Photo / Video
Display	-	Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal)
Loudspeaker	Voice 66dB / Noise 66dB / Ring 72dB	-24.6 LUFS (Very good)
Performance	Basemark OS II 2.0: 1176Basemark X: 11855	AnTuTu: 827929 (v9) GeekBench: 3458 (v5.1) GFXBench: 62fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

OUR TESTS
Audio quality	Noise -93.5dB / Crosstalk -93.8dB	-
Battery (old)	Endurance rating 48h	Endurance rating 101h
Camera	Photo / Video	Photo / Video
Display	-	946 nits max brightness (measured)
Loudspeaker	Voice 66dB / Noise 66dB / Ring 72dB	-24.6 LUFS (Very good)
Performance	Basemark OS II 2.0: 1176Basemark X: 11855	AnTuTu: 827929 (v9) GeekBench: 3458 (v5.1) GFXBench: 62fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

Motorola Moto X (2nd Gen)

Excellent battery life (48h)
Compact size
Relatively affordable (used market)

Outdated processor
Lower resolution display
Slower charging
Less advanced camera

Motorola Edge 30 Fusion

Blazing-fast performance (Snapdragon 888+)
Bright and vibrant OLED display
Fast charging (68W)
Improved camera system
Modern design

Potentially higher price (new)
May be larger than some prefer

Display Comparison

The Edge 30 Fusion's 6.55-inch OLED display with a 946 nits peak brightness and infinite contrast ratio blows the Moto X's (2nd Gen) 5.2-inch LCD screen out of the water. Colors are more vibrant, blacks are deeper, and outdoor visibility is significantly better on the Edge 30 Fusion. The Moto X's display is adequate but noticeably less impressive.

Camera Comparison

While both phones offer 'Photo / Video' capabilities, the Edge 30 Fusion's camera system is considerably more advanced. It likely features a higher resolution main sensor, improved image processing, and potentially additional lenses (like ultrawide or telephoto) not specified in the provided data. The Moto X's camera was decent for its time, but it can't compete with modern smartphone cameras.

Performance

The Snapdragon 888+ 5G in the Edge 30 Fusion offers a massive performance leap over the Snapdragon 801 in the Moto X (2nd Gen). Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and a more responsive user experience on the Edge 30 Fusion. Gaming performance is also dramatically improved.

Battery Life

Interestingly, both phones boast an endurance rating of 48h (Moto X) and 101h (Edge 30 Fusion). However, the Edge 30 Fusion's 68W wired charging is a game-changer, allowing it to reach 50% charge in just 10 minutes – a feature completely absent in the Moto X.

Buying Guide

Who should buy the Motorola Moto X (2nd Gen)? Those seeking a budget-friendly, reliable phone with excellent battery life and a comfortable size, and who aren't concerned with cutting-edge features. Who should buy the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion? Users prioritizing performance, a vibrant display, a versatile camera, and rapid charging capabilities.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Is the Moto X (2nd Gen) still a good phone?

It's a reliable option for basic tasks and offers excellent battery life, but it's significantly outdated compared to modern smartphones. It's best suited for users on a very tight budget.

❓ What is the biggest advantage of the Edge 30 Fusion?

The Edge 30 Fusion's biggest advantage is its performance. The Snapdragon 888+ processor provides a smooth and responsive experience for all tasks, including gaming and demanding apps.