The smartwatch market offers options at every price point. We're pitting the Motorola Moto Watch Fit, a newcomer focused on affordability and core fitness tracking, against the Samsung Galaxy Watch Active2 Aluminum, a more established player boasting a powerful processor and refined smartwatch experience. This comparison dives deep to determine which device delivers the best value for your wrist.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing a seamless smartwatch experience and robust performance, the Samsung Galaxy Watch Active2 Aluminum is the clear winner. Its Exynos 9110 chipset provides a significantly smoother user interface and broader app compatibility. However, the Moto Watch Fit may appeal to those solely focused on basic fitness tracking on a tight budget.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | N/A | N/A |
| 3G bands | - | HSDPA 900 / 2100 - 44mm LTE version only |
| 4G bands | - | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20 - 44mm LTE version only |
| EDGE | No | - |
| GPRS | No | - |
| Speed | - | No |
| Technology | No cellular connectivity | HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, April 24 | 2019, August. Released 2019, September |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, May | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass DX+), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 44.5 x 38 x 9.5 mm (1.75 x 1.50 x 0.37 in) | 44 x 44 x 10.9 mm (1.73 x 1.73 x 0.43 in) |
| SIM | No | No |
| Weight | 25 g (0.88 oz) | 30 g (1.06 oz) |
| | - | 50m water resistant (IP68)
Compatible with standard 20mm straps
ECG certified
Touch-sensitive bezel
MIL-STD-810G compliant*
*does not guarantee ruggedness or use in extreme conditions |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass DX+ |
| Resolution | 348 x 442 pixels* (~296 ppi density) | 360 x 360 pixels (~364 ppi density) |
| Size | 1.9 inches | 1.4 inches |
| Type | OLED, 1000 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED |
| | - | Always-on display |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | - | Dual-core 1.15 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| Chipset | - | Exynos 9110 (10 nm) |
| GPU | - | Mali-T720 |
| OS | RTOS | Tizen OS 5.5 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | Unspecified storage | 4GB 768MB RAM, 4GB 1.5GB RAM |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | No | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | No | No |
| WLAN | No | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, heart rate, PPG | Accelerometer, gyro, heart rate, barometer |
| | - | Natural language commands and dictation
Samsung Pay |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | Wireless |
| Type | - | Li-Ion 340 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Trekking Green | Cloud Silver, Aqua Black, Pink Gold, Phantom Violet |
| Models | - | SM-R830 |
| Price | About 80 EUR | About 300 EUR |
Motorola Moto Watch Fit
- Likely more affordable price point
- Potentially longer battery life due to simpler features
- Focus on core fitness tracking
- Significantly less powerful processor
- Likely a lower-quality display
- Limited smartwatch functionality
Samsung Galaxy Watch Active2 Aluminum
- Powerful Exynos 9110 processor for smooth performance
- Vibrant Super AMOLED display
- Wireless charging convenience
- Higher price point
- Potentially shorter battery life
- More complex interface may be overwhelming for some
Display Comparison
The Moto Watch Fit's display specifications are currently unavailable, but given its market positioning, we anticipate a basic LCD panel. In contrast, the Samsung Galaxy Watch Active2 Aluminum features a Super AMOLED display, known for its vibrant colors and excellent contrast. The Active2's display technology allows for deeper blacks and a more visually appealing experience, particularly outdoors. While the Active2's resolution isn't specified, AMOLED generally offers sharper images than comparable LCDs. The lack of LTPO in either device suggests neither offers adaptive refresh rates for battery savings.
Camera Comparison
Neither device features a camera, a common omission in fitness-focused smartwatches. This simplifies the design and reduces power consumption, prioritizing battery life and core functionality. The absence of a camera isn't a significant drawback for users primarily interested in fitness tracking and notifications.
Performance
The Samsung Galaxy Watch Active2 Aluminum's dual-core 1.15 GHz Cortex-A53 processor, built on Samsung’s 10nm Exynos 9110 chipset, provides a substantial performance advantage over the Moto Watch Fit. The Moto Watch Fit likely utilizes a significantly less powerful chipset, typical of budget wearables, resulting in slower app loading times and a less responsive user interface. The Exynos 9110’s architecture allows for smoother multitasking and more complex app functionality. While RAM capacity isn't specified for either device, the Active2's processor suggests a larger allocation, further enhancing performance.
Battery Life
Battery life for the Moto Watch Fit is unknown, but its simpler feature set suggests potentially longer endurance than the Active2. The Samsung Galaxy Watch Active2 Aluminum’s battery capacity isn’t specified, but its more powerful processor and AMOLED display will consume more power. The Active2 benefits from wireless charging, offering convenience, while the Moto Watch Fit likely relies on a proprietary charging cable. Real-world usage will heavily influence battery life on both devices, but the Active2’s faster processor will likely necessitate more frequent charging.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Moto Watch Fit if you need a simple, affordable fitness tracker with essential features like heart rate monitoring and step counting, and aren't concerned with advanced smartwatch capabilities. Buy the Samsung Galaxy Watch Active2 Aluminum if you prefer a more comprehensive smartwatch experience with a powerful processor, wireless charging, and access to a wider range of apps and features, even if it comes at a higher price point.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Exynos 9110 chip in the Galaxy Watch Active2 Aluminum tend to overheat during intensive use?
The Exynos 9110 is a relatively efficient chip, and while it can get warm during prolonged use of demanding apps or GPS tracking, it's unlikely to overheat to the point of causing performance issues. Samsung implemented thermal management solutions to mitigate heat buildup.
❓ What level of water resistance does the Moto Watch Fit offer, and is it suitable for swimming?
Specific water resistance details for the Moto Watch Fit are currently unavailable. However, given its budget positioning, it likely offers basic splash resistance rather than full swim-proof capabilities. The Galaxy Watch Active2 Aluminum has a 5ATM water resistance rating, making it suitable for shallow-water activities like swimming.
❓ Can I use the Samsung Galaxy Watch Active2 Aluminum with an iPhone?
While the Galaxy Watch Active2 Aluminum is compatible with iPhones, functionality is limited compared to pairing with an Android device. You'll lose features like replying to notifications and making calls directly from the watch.
