The Motorola Moto Watch 70 and Huawei Watch GT 3 SE represent compelling options in the increasingly crowded budget smartwatch space. While both aim to deliver essential fitness tracking and notification features, they diverge significantly in their charging approaches – a key consideration for daily usability. This comparison dissects these differences and highlights which watch best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing speed and minimal downtime, the Motorola Moto Watch 70’s 20-minute full charge is a clear advantage. However, the Huawei Watch GT 3 SE’s wireless charging offers unmatched convenience, making it ideal for those who value ease of use over raw charging velocity.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | N/A | N/A |
| 3G bands | - | N/A |
| 4G bands | - | N/A |
| EDGE | No | No |
| GPRS | No | No |
| Speed | - | No |
| Technology | No cellular connectivity | No cellular connectivity |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, May 02 | 2022, November 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, May 02 | Available. Released 2022, November 10 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum frame | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 48.5 x 36.5 x 11 mm (1.91 x 1.44 x 0.43 in) | 46.4 x 46.4 x 11 mm (1.83 x 1.83 x 0.43 in) |
| SIM | No | No |
| Weight | 48 g (1.69 oz) | 35.6 g (1.27 oz) |
| | IP67 | 50m water resistant
5 ATM
Compatible with standard 22mm straps (46mm model) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 240 x 280 pixels (~218 ppi density) | 466 x 466 pixels (~326 ppi density) |
| Size | 1.69 inches | 1.43 inches |
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| Platform |
|---|
| OS | Moto Watch OS | HarmonyOS 2.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | Unspecified storage | 4GB |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | No | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | Yes |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | No | GPS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | No | No |
| WLAN | No | No |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, heart rate, thermometer (body temperature) | Accelerometer, gyro, heart rate, barometer, compass, SpO2 |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | Wired, 100% in 20 min | Wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 355 mAh | 455 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Phantom Black | Graphite Black, Wilderness Green |
| Models | MOSWZ70, MOSWZ70-PB | RUNE-B29 |
| Price | About 70 EUR | About 200 EUR |
Motorola Moto Watch 70
- Extremely fast 20-minute charging time
- Wired charging is generally more efficient
- Potentially smaller form factor due to less emphasis on large battery
- Requires a cable and charging brick
- Wired charging can be less convenient
- Potential for port wear and tear
Huawei Watch GT 3 SE
- Convenient wireless charging
- No need for cables or specific charging orientation
- Reduced port wear and tear
- Slower charging speeds compared to wired
- Wireless charging can be less efficient
- Requires a compatible wireless charging pad
Display Comparison
Information regarding display specifications is unavailable. However, given the price point, both watches likely utilize LCD panels. The absence of LTPO technology suggests refresh rates are fixed, impacting battery consumption during always-on display usage. Bezels are likely to be more prominent than on premium models, and color accuracy will be a secondary consideration.
Camera Comparison
Neither device features a camera, focusing instead on core smartwatch functionality. This omission is typical for watches in this price bracket, prioritizing battery life and form factor over photographic capabilities.
Performance
Performance data is unavailable for both devices. However, considering their market positioning, both likely employ efficient, low-power chipsets focused on fitness tracking and notification handling rather than demanding applications. The Moto Watch 70’s wired charging suggests a potentially smaller battery, requiring faster charging to compensate. The GT 3 SE, benefiting from wireless charging, may prioritize battery capacity over charging speed.
Battery Life
The core differentiator lies in charging. The Motorola Moto Watch 70 boasts a full charge in just 20 minutes via a wired connection. This is a significant advantage for users who need a quick boost. Conversely, the Huawei Watch GT 3 SE utilizes wireless charging, offering convenience but likely at the expense of speed. While total battery capacity is unknown for both, the GT 3 SE’s wireless charging suggests a focus on sustained usage rather than rapid replenishment.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Moto Watch 70 if you frequently find yourself needing a quick top-up before a workout or important meeting, and value the speed of a wired connection. Buy the Huawei Watch GT 3 SE if you prefer the simplicity of wireless charging, dislike cable clutter, and prioritize a hassle-free charging experience, even if it takes longer to reach 100%.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the wired charging of the Moto Watch 70 use a standard USB-C port, or a proprietary connector?
While not explicitly stated, given current industry trends and the Moto Watch 70's positioning, it's highly probable that it utilizes a standard USB-C port for charging. This would allow for compatibility with a wide range of chargers and cables, increasing convenience.
❓ Is the wireless charging on the Huawei Watch GT 3 SE Qi-compatible, allowing it to charge on any Qi wireless charger?
Huawei typically implements Qi compatibility in its wireless charging solutions. Therefore, it's likely the Watch GT 3 SE will work with most standard Qi-enabled wireless chargers, offering flexibility in charging options.
❓ If I frequently travel, which watch would be more convenient to pack and charge?
The Huawei Watch GT 3 SE would be more convenient for travel. Eliminating the need for a charging cable reduces clutter and the risk of forgetting an essential accessory. The Moto Watch 70 requires carrying both the watch and its charging cable.
