Motorola Watch 200 vs. Motorola A925: A Clash of Eras

The Motorola A925 represents a bygone era of mobile technology, while the Moto Watch 200 aims for a modern smartwatch experience. This comparison explores how these devices stack up against each other, highlighting the vast differences in technology and functionality.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

The Moto Watch 200 is the clear winner for modern users. While the A925 holds nostalgic charm, its outdated specs make it unsuitable for contemporary needs. The Watch 200 offers smartwatch features, while the A925 is a basic feature phone.

PHONES
Phone Names Motorola Moto Watch 200 Motorola A925
Network
2G bandsN/AGSM 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bands-UMTS 2100
EDGENo-
GPRSNo-
Speed-Yes, 384 kbps
TechnologyNo cellular connectivityGSM / UMTS
Launch
Announced2023, May 022003, Q4
StatusCancelledDiscontinued
Body
BuildGlass front, aluminum frame-
Dimensions46.5 x 38 x 12.3 mm (1.83 x 1.50 x 0.48 in)148 x 60 x 24 mm, 175 cc (5.83 x 2.36 x 0.94 in)
SIMNoMini-SIM
Weight45 g (1.59 oz)210 g (7.41 oz)
 5 ATM, 50m water resistant-
Display
Resolution348 x 442 pixels (~316 ppi density)208 x 320 pixels, 3:2 ratio
Size1.78 inches-
TypeAMOLEDTFT resistive touchscreen, 65K colors
Platform
CPU-168 MHz ARM925T
Chipset-TI OMAP 1510
OSMoto Watch OSSymbian 7.0, UIQ 2.0
Memory
Card slotNoMMC/SD, 32 MB SD included
InternalUnspecified storage12MB
Main Camera
Single-VGA
Video-Yes
Selfie camera
Single-Yes
Sound
3.5mm jack NoNo
35mm jackNoNo
Alert types-Vibration; Downloadable polyphonic, MP3 , WAV ringtones
Loudspeaker NoNo
Comms
Bluetooth5.3, A2DP, LE1.1
Infrared port-Yes
NFCUnspecified-
PositioningGPSGPS
RadioNoNo
USBNoProprietary
WLANNoNo
Features
Browser-WAP 2.0/xHTML
SensorsAccelerometer, gyro, heart rate, SpO2, altimeter-
 -MP3/MP4 player Organizer Predictive text input Sync ML Voice memo
Battery
Stand-by-Up to 160 h
Talk time-Up to 2 h
TypeLi-Po 355 mAhRemovable Li-Po 1050 mAh battery (BA680)
Misc
ColorsWarm Gold, Phantom Black-
PriceAbout 150 EUR-
Camera
 No-

Motorola Moto Watch 200

  • Modern smartwatch features
  • Fitness tracking
  • Notifications
  • Likely better camera

  • Unknown specific specs
  • Potential for shorter battery life than A925 in standby

Motorola A925

  • Extremely durable
  • Long standby time (potentially)
  • Nostalgic appeal

  • Extremely slow performance
  • Limited functionality
  • Low-resolution display
  • No camera (likely)
  • Outdated technology

Display Comparison

The Moto Watch 200 likely features a color touchscreen display, offering vibrant visuals and interactive elements. The A925, being an older device, probably has a small, monochrome LCD screen with limited resolution, prioritizing battery life over visual fidelity.

Camera Comparison

The Moto Watch 200 likely has a camera for taking photos or videos. The A925 probably lacks a camera entirely, or has a very low-resolution camera by today's standards.

Performance

The A925's TI OMAP 1510 chipset with a 168 MHz ARM925T CPU is incredibly slow by today's standards. The Moto Watch 200, even with unknown specs, will almost certainly offer significantly faster processing power and smoother performance for its intended smartwatch functions.

Battery Life

While the A925's older technology might allow for longer standby times, the Moto Watch 200's modern battery technology and efficient components will likely provide a more usable battery life for its features.

Buying Guide

The Motorola Moto Watch 200 is for those seeking a modern smartwatch with fitness tracking and notification capabilities. The Motorola A925 is for collectors of vintage mobile phones or those needing a very basic, durable phone for emergencies.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ What year was the Motorola A925 released?
The Motorola A925 was released around 2003-2004, representing a significant era in mobile phone history.
❓ Can the Motorola A925 connect to the internet?
The Motorola A925 supports basic 2G connectivity, but it lacks the capabilities for modern internet browsing or data usage.