The smartwatch market is booming, offering a plethora of options for fitness tracking, notifications, and more. Today, we're pitting two very different contenders against each other: the budget-friendly Motorola Moto Watch 200 and the premium, rugged Apple Watch Ultra. Let's dive into a comprehensive comparison to see which one comes out on top.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Apple Watch Ultra is the clear winner for performance, features, and durability, especially for serious athletes. However, the Moto Watch 200 offers a compelling value proposition for those seeking basic smartwatch functionality and fitness tracking without breaking the bank. It's a trade-off between premium features and affordability.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | N/A | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | - | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International, China, HK |
| 4G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International, China, HK |
| EDGE | No | - |
| GPRS | No | - |
| Speed | - | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | No cellular connectivity | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 25, 26, 39, 40, 41, 66 - USA, LATAM, Canada |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, May 02 | 2022, September 07 |
| Status | Cancelled | Available. Released 2022, September 23 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum frame | Sapphire crystal front, ceramic/sapphire crystal back, titanium frame |
| Dimensions | 46.5 x 38 x 12.3 mm (1.83 x 1.50 x 0.48 in) | 49 x 44 x 14.4 mm (1.93 x 1.73 x 0.57 in) |
| SIM | No | eSIM |
| Weight | 45 g (1.59 oz) | 61.3 g (2.15 oz) |
| | 5 ATM, 50m water resistant | IP6X certified
100m water resistant (WR100)
40m swimproof/diving (EN13319)
MIL-STD 810H certified
ECG certified (region dependent SW application; HW available on all models) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Sapphire crystal glass |
| Resolution | 348 x 442 pixels (~316 ppi density) | 502 x 410 pixels (~338 ppi density) |
| Size | 1.78 inches | 1.92 inches |
| Type | AMOLED | Retina LTPO OLED, 2000 nits (peak) |
| | - | Always-on display |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | - | Dual-core |
| Chipset | - | Apple S8 |
| GPU | - | PowerVR |
| OS | Moto Watch OS | watchOS 9.0, upgradable to watchOS 26.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | Unspecified storage | 32GB |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | No | Yes, with dual speakers (86-decibel) |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Unspecified | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | No | No |
| WLAN | No | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, heart rate, SpO2, altimeter | Accelerometer, gyro, heart rate, barometer, always-on altimeter, compass, SpO2, VO2max, temperature (body), temperature (water) |
| | - | Temperature sensing (0.01˚ accuracy)
Depth gauge (±1m accuracy)
Natural language commands and dictation (talking mode)
Ultra Wideband (UWB) support |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | Wireless, 0-80% in 60 min |
| Type | Li-Po 355 mAh | Li-Ion 542 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Warm Gold, Phantom Black | Titanium |
| Models | - | A2684, A2622, A2859, watch6,18 |
| Price | About 150 EUR | About 550 EUR |
| SAR EU | - | 0.35 W/kg (head) 0.60 W/kg (body) |
Motorola Moto Watch 200
- Affordable
- Longer Battery Life (estimated)
- Simple Interface
- Lightweight Design
- Limited Features
- Less Powerful Processor
- Lower Display Quality
- Potentially Less Accurate Fitness Tracking
Apple Watch Ultra
- Premium Performance
- Advanced Health Features
- Rugged Design
- Bright & Large Display
- Seamless iOS Integration
- Expensive
- Shorter Battery Life (compared to Moto Watch 200)
- Requires iPhone
- Can be Overkill for Casual Users
Display Comparison
The Apple Watch Ultra boasts a significantly larger and brighter display (49mm) with excellent outdoor visibility, while the Moto Watch 200 likely features a smaller, less vibrant display (estimated 1.78 inches). The Ultra's always-on display is a major advantage.
Camera Comparison
The Apple Watch Ultra lacks a dedicated camera, relying on the iPhone for photography. The Moto Watch 200 may or may not have a camera, but its image quality would likely be subpar compared to a smartphone.
Performance
The Apple Watch Ultra, powered by the S8 chip, delivers blazing-fast performance and seamless multitasking. The Moto Watch 200, likely running a less powerful processor, will offer adequate performance for basic tasks but may struggle with more demanding apps.
Battery Life
The Apple Watch Ultra offers a respectable battery life (estimated 36 hours), and charges to 80% in just 60 minutes. The Moto Watch 200 is expected to have longer battery life (potentially several days) due to its less power-hungry components, but charging speeds will likely be slower.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Motorola Moto Watch 200? Casual users, budget-conscious shoppers, and those primarily interested in basic fitness tracking and notifications. Who should buy the Apple Watch Ultra? Serious athletes, outdoor enthusiasts, those needing advanced health features, and users deeply invested in the Apple ecosystem.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Apple Watch Ultra worth the price?
The Apple Watch Ultra is a premium device with a high price tag. It's worth it if you're a serious athlete, outdoor enthusiast, or deeply invested in the Apple ecosystem and need advanced features.
❓ What is the battery life of the Moto Watch 200?
While specific details are unavailable, the Moto Watch 200 is expected to offer several days of battery life due to its less demanding hardware.
