The smartwatch market is booming, offering a plethora of options for tracking fitness, receiving notifications, and more. Today, we're pitting two contenders against each other: the budget-friendly Motorola Moto Watch 100 and the feature-rich Samsung Galaxy Watch. Let's dive into a detailed comparison to see which one comes out on top.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy Watch offers significantly more features, a faster processor, and a more polished experience. While the Moto Watch 100 provides a basic smartwatch experience at a lower price point, the Galaxy Watch's superior performance and functionality make it the clear winner for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | N/A | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | - | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 - Global |
| 4G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20 - Global |
| EDGE | No | - |
| GPRS | No | - |
| Speed | - | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | No cellular connectivity | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 38, 39, 40, 41 - China |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, November 17 | 2018, August. Released 2018, August |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, December 10 | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass DX+), stainless steel frame 316L |
| Dimensions | 42 x 46 x 11.9 mm (1.65 x 1.81 x 0.47 in) | 49 x 46 x 13 mm (1.93 x 1.81 x 0.51 in) |
| SIM | No | eSIM |
| Weight | 29 g (1.02 oz) | 63 g (2.22 oz) |
| | 5 ATM, 50m water resistant
Compatible with standard 20mm straps | MIL-STD-810G compliant*
50m water resistant (IP68)
Compatible with standard 22mm straps
Rotating bezel
*does not guarantee ruggedness or use in extreme conditions |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass DX+ |
| Resolution | 360 x 360 pixels (~392 ppi density) | 360 x 360 pixels (~278 ppi density) |
| Size | 1.3 inches | 1.3 inches |
| Type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| | - | Always-on display
Rotating bezel |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | - | Dual-core 1.15 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| Chipset | - | Exynos 9110 (10 nm) |
| GPU | - | Mali-T720 |
| OS | Moto Watch OS | Tizen OS 5.5 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | Unspecified storage | 4GB 768MB RAM, 4GB 1.5GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | No | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 4.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | No | No |
| WLAN | No | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, heart rate, SpO2 | Accelerometer, gyro, heart rate, barometer |
| | - | Natural language commands and dictation
Samsung Pay |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | Wireless |
| Type | Li-Ion 355 mAh | Li-Ion 472 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Glacier Silver, Phantom Black | Silver 46mm, Midnight Black 42mm, Rose Gold 42mm |
| Models | - | SM-805U, SM-805W, SM-815U, SM-815W, SM-R805F, SM-R805N, SM-R815F, SM-R815N, SM-R8050, SM-R800 |
| Price | About 100 EUR | About 220 EUR |
Motorola Moto Watch 100
- Affordable price
- Longer battery life (potentially)
- Simple and easy to use
- Limited features
- Less powerful processor
- Basic display quality
- Fewer app options
Samsung Galaxy Watch
- Feature-rich experience
- Powerful processor
- Vibrant AMOLED display
- Wireless charging
- Extensive app ecosystem
- Seamless Samsung integration
- Higher price
- Shorter battery life (compared to Moto Watch 100)
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy Watch typically boasts a vibrant AMOLED display with customizable watch faces and excellent outdoor visibility. The Moto Watch 100 likely features a smaller, less vibrant LCD display, prioritizing affordability over premium visuals. Expect sharper images and richer colors on the Galaxy Watch.
Camera Comparison
Neither watch has a built-in camera. This is a common omission in smartwatches, relying instead on smartphone integration.
Performance
The Samsung Galaxy Watch, powered by an Exynos 9110 processor, offers noticeably smoother performance and faster app loading times compared to the likely less powerful chipset in the Moto Watch 100. This translates to a more responsive and enjoyable user experience.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy Watch's battery life typically ranges from 1-2 days depending on usage, while the Moto Watch 100, with its simpler features, may offer slightly longer battery life, potentially up to 3-5 days. Wireless charging is a convenient feature on the Galaxy Watch.
Buying Guide
The Motorola Moto Watch 100 is ideal for first-time smartwatch users or those on a tight budget who primarily want basic fitness tracking and notifications. The Samsung Galaxy Watch is best suited for users who want a comprehensive smartwatch experience with advanced features, a robust app ecosystem, and seamless integration with other Samsung devices.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Moto Watch 100 have GPS?
The Moto Watch 100 may have limited GPS capabilities or rely on connected GPS (using your phone's GPS). The Samsung Galaxy Watch typically has built-in GPS for accurate tracking.
❓ Is the Samsung Galaxy Watch compatible with iPhones?
While the Samsung Galaxy Watch offers some limited compatibility with iPhones, it's primarily designed for Android devices and offers a significantly better experience when paired with a Samsung phone.
