Motorola offers a diverse range of devices, from smartwatches to powerful smartphones. Today, we're pitting the Moto Watch 100, a budget-friendly smartwatch, against the Motorola Moto G200 5G, a mid-range powerhouse. This comparison will help you decide which Motorola gadget best suits your needs and budget.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Moto G200 5G is the clear winner for most users. Its superior performance, impressive display, and exceptional battery life far outweigh the Moto Watch 100's simplicity. The Watch 100 is a basic smartwatch for fitness tracking, while the G200 is a full-fledged smartphone.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | N/A | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | - | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| EDGE | No | - |
| GPRS | No | - |
| Speed | - | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat20 2000/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | No cellular connectivity | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, November 17 | 2021, November 18 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, December 10 | Available. Released 2022, February 10 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, aluminum frame | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 42 x 46 x 11.9 mm (1.65 x 1.81 x 0.47 in) | 168.1 x 75.5 x 8.9 mm (6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | No | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 29 g (1.02 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| | 5 ATM, 50m water resistant
Compatible with standard 20mm straps | Water-repellent design |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 360 x 360 pixels (~392 ppi density) | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 1.3 inches | 6.8 inches, 109.8 cm2 (~86.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | LCD, 144Hz, HDR10 |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | - | Octa-core (1x2.99 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | - | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888+ 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | - | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Moto Watch OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | Unspecified storage | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | - | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
13 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm, AF
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | - | 8K@24fps, 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 1080p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | - | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | No | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | No | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| WLAN | No | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, heart rate, SpO2 | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| | - | Ready For support |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 33W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 355 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Glacier Silver, Phantom Black | Stellar Blue, Glacier Green |
| Price | About 100 EUR | About 290 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 102h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1633:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.7 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 682346 (v8), 811124 (v9)
GeekBench: 3319 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 60fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Motorola Moto Watch 100
- Affordable
- Basic fitness tracking
- Notifications
- Lightweight
- Limited functionality
- Small display
- Basic camera
- Shorter battery life compared to smartphones
Motorola Moto G200 5G
- Powerful performance
- Excellent battery life
- Vibrant display
- Capable camera
- 5G connectivity
- Larger size
- Potentially bulky
- Software updates can be delayed
Display Comparison
The Moto G200 5G boasts a significantly superior display. With a measured brightness of 558 nits and a 1633:1 contrast ratio, it offers vibrant colors and excellent visibility even in bright sunlight. The Moto Watch 100 likely has a smaller, lower-resolution display suitable for glanceable notifications but not for media consumption.
Camera Comparison
The Moto G200 5G's camera system is expected to be far more capable than the Moto Watch 100's. While the Watch 100 might have a basic camera for occasional selfies, the G200 offers a versatile camera setup for photos and videos in various conditions.
Performance
The Moto G200 5G's Snapdragon 888+ 5G chipset provides a substantial performance advantage. This flagship-level processor handles demanding tasks and games with ease. The Moto Watch 100, being a smartwatch, has a much less powerful processor optimized for basic functions.
Battery Life
The Moto G200 5G shines with its incredible endurance rating of 102 hours. This translates to multiple days of use on a single charge. The Moto Watch 100's battery life is likely shorter, requiring more frequent charging, though it's optimized for its smaller size and less demanding tasks.
Buying Guide
The Motorola Moto Watch 100 is ideal for users seeking a simple, affordable smartwatch primarily for basic fitness tracking and notifications. The Motorola Moto G200 5G is perfect for those needing a powerful smartphone with a vibrant display, capable camera, and long-lasting battery for everyday use and gaming.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Moto Watch 100 waterproof?
While specific details are unavailable, most basic smartwatches offer some level of water resistance, but it's best to check the official specifications for confirmation.
❓ Can the Moto G200 5G handle gaming?
Yes, the Snapdragon 888+ 5G chipset in the Moto G200 5G is more than capable of handling demanding mobile games with smooth performance.
