The tablet market is heating up, and two contenders are vying for your attention: the Motorola Moto Tab G62 and the Xiaomi Redmi Pad. Both offer compelling features at competitive prices, but which one truly delivers the best experience? Let's dive into a detailed comparison to help you decide.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Xiaomi Redmi Pad edges out the Moto Tab G62 thanks to its brighter display and slightly better overall value. While the Moto Tab G62 has a capable chipset, the Redmi Pad's screen and broader appeal make it the preferred choice for most users seeking an affordable Android tablet.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | N/A |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | N/A |
| 4G bands | LTE | N/A |
| EDGE | - | N/A |
| GPRS | - | N/A |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps - cellular model only | - |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | No cellular connectivity |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, August 17 | 2022, October 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, August 22 | Available. Released 2022, October 05 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum back, aluminum frame | Glass front, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 251.2 x 158.8 x 7.5 mm (9.89 x 6.25 x 0.30 in) | 250.5 x 158.1 x 7.1 mm (9.86 x 6.22 x 0.28 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM (cellular model only) | No |
| Weight | 465 g (1.03 lb) | 465 g (1.03 lb) |
| | Water-repellent design | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1200 x 2000 pixels, 5:3 ratio (~220 ppi density) | 1200 x 2000 pixels, 5:3 ratio (~220 ppi density) |
| Size | 10.6 inches, 319.8 cm2 (~80.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 10.61 inches, 320.4 cm2 (~80.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 1B colors, 90Hz, 400 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 3GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0, 1.12µm, AF | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.3, 105° (ultrawide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS - cellular model only | No |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity | Accelerometer |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 20W wired | 18W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 7700 mAh | Li-Po 8000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Gray | Graphite Gray, Moonlight Silver, Mint Green |
| Models | - | 22081283G |
| Price | About 200 EUR | About 250 EUR |
| SAR EU | - | 0.36 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1529:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-23.9 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 319077 (v9)
GeekBench: 1852 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 13fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Motorola Moto Tab G62
- Smooth performance for everyday tasks
- Clean Android experience
- Decent audio quality
- Lower display brightness
- Slower charging
- Less versatile feature set
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
- Brighter and more vibrant display
- Better gaming performance
- Improved speakers
- More polished software
- Slightly slower CPU performance in some benchmarks
- Xiaomi's MIUI can be divisive
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi Redmi Pad boasts a brighter display (402 nits vs Moto Tab G62's likely lower brightness) which makes it more enjoyable for outdoor use and in brightly lit environments. Both tablets offer a 1529:1 contrast ratio, indicating good black levels, but the Redmi Pad's higher brightness gives it a noticeable edge. The Redmi Pad also generally has better color accuracy.
Camera Comparison
Neither tablet excels in the camera department. Both offer basic cameras suitable for video calls, but image quality is not a strong point. Expect decent performance in well-lit conditions, but struggles in low light. The Redmi Pad's camera is slightly better overall.
Performance
The Moto Tab G62's Snapdragon 680 offers a slight edge in raw CPU power, but the Redmi Pad's Helio G99 is optimized for gaming and provides a smoother experience in graphically intensive tasks. Both chipsets are capable of handling everyday tasks without issue, but the Redmi Pad's GPU gives it a slight advantage.
Battery Life
Both tablets offer large batteries, providing all-day battery life with moderate usage. The Moto Tab G62's 20W charging is slightly slower than the Redmi Pad's 18W charging, but the difference is minimal in real-world usage.
Buying Guide
The Motorola Moto Tab G62 is ideal for users prioritizing a smooth, everyday experience for browsing, streaming, and light gaming. The Xiaomi Redmi Pad is a better choice for those who value a vibrant display for media consumption and a more versatile feature set, including better speakers and a more polished software experience.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which tablet is better for gaming?
The Xiaomi Redmi Pad generally offers a better gaming experience due to its more powerful GPU.
❓ Is the Moto Tab G62 good for reading?
Yes, the Moto Tab G62 is suitable for reading, but the Redmi Pad's brighter display makes it more comfortable in various lighting conditions.
❓ Which tablet has a better software experience?
The Moto Tab G62 offers a cleaner, more stock Android experience, while the Redmi Pad utilizes Xiaomi's MIUI, which offers more features but can be more cluttered.
