Oppo Find X7 vs Motorola Moto S50: A Deep Dive into Dimensity Performance and Charging Speed
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and rapid charging, the Oppo Find X7 is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 9300 offers a substantial leap over the Moto S50’s Dimensity 7300. However, the Moto S50 provides a compelling value proposition for those seeking a balanced experience without the flagship price tag.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Moto S50 | Oppo Find X7 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 3, 4, 5 , 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, September 05 | 2024, January 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, September 05 | Available. Released 2024, January 12 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back or silicone polymer (eco leather) back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back or eco leather back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 154.1 x 71.2 x 8.1 mm (6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 in) | 162.7 x 75.4 x 8.7 mm or 9.0 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 170 g (6.00 oz) | 202 g or 206 g (7.13 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Resolution | 1272 x 2670 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~460 ppi density) | 1264 x 2780 pixels (~450 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.36 inches, 103.5 cm2 (~94.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.7 cm2 (~91.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO P-OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 3000 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1600 nits (typ), 2300 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.25 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9300 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Immortalis-G720 MC12 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 14, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Hasselblad Color Calibration, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.5", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 10 MP, f/2.0, 73mm (telephoto), 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 13 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm, PDAF | 50 MP, f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", PDAF, OIS 64 MP, f/2.6, 70mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", 3x optical zoom, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video, Dolby Vision |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | Panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 0.7µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 68W wired, 50% in 13 min 15W wireless | 100W wired, PD, 50% in 10 min, 100% in 26 min |
| Type | 4310 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Nautical Blue, Latte, Poinciana | Black, Dark Blue, Light Brown, Purple |
| Models | XT2309-5 | PHZ110 |
| Price | About 280 EUR | About 520 EUR |
Motorola Moto S50
- More affordable price point
- Efficient Dimensity 7300 chipset for everyday tasks
- Respectable 68W wired charging
- Significantly lower performance compared to the Find X7
- Likely less advanced camera system
- Slower charging speeds than the Oppo Find X7
Oppo Find X7
- Flagship-level performance with Dimensity 9300
- Ultra-fast 100W wired charging with PD support
- Likely superior camera system with advanced features
- Higher price tag
- Potentially higher power consumption
- May require a dedicated 100W charger
Display Comparison
While specific display details are absent, both phones utilize 4nm chipsets suggesting a focus on efficiency. The Oppo Find X7, positioned as a higher-end device, likely features a higher-quality panel with potentially higher peak brightness and color accuracy. Motorola typically prioritizes value, so the S50’s display may be more focused on cost-effectiveness. Expect the Find X7 to have a more advanced display technology, potentially including LTPO for adaptive refresh rates, contributing to better battery life.
Camera Comparison
Without specific camera specs, it’s difficult to make a definitive comparison. However, the Oppo Find X7, as a flagship-leaning device, is expected to feature a more sophisticated camera system with a larger main sensor and potentially optical image stabilization (OIS). The Dimensity 9300’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) is also more advanced, enabling better image processing and low-light performance. The Moto S50 will likely offer a competent camera for everyday use, but may lack the advanced features and image quality of the Find X7.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo Find X7’s Mediatek Dimensity 9300, with its 1x3.25 GHz Cortex-X4 prime core and 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 performance cores, represents a significant upgrade over the Motorola Moto S50’s Dimensity 7300. The Dimensity 9300’s Cortex-X4 cores deliver substantially higher single-core performance, crucial for responsive app launches and smooth multitasking. The Dimensity 7300’s Cortex-A78 cores, while capable, are a generation behind and operate at a lower clock speed. This translates to a noticeable performance gap in demanding applications and graphically intensive games. The Find X7 will likely benefit from faster LPDDR5x RAM, further enhancing performance.
Battery Life
The Oppo Find X7’s 100W wired charging is a major advantage, achieving a 50% charge in just 10 minutes and a full charge in 26 minutes. The Motorola Moto S50’s 68W charging, while respectable, is slower, taking 13 minutes to reach 50%. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging of the Find X7 mitigates any potential disadvantage from a smaller battery size. The Find X7 also supports PD (Power Delivery), offering wider compatibility with chargers.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Moto S50 if you need a reliable daily driver with good battery life and efficient performance for everyday tasks and light gaming, and value affordability. Buy the Oppo Find X7 if you demand the fastest possible performance for demanding games and applications, require the convenience of 100W fast charging, and are willing to pay a premium for a more refined experience.