The Android tablet market is heating up, with both Motorola and Xiaomi offering compelling options. The Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro aims to deliver a balanced experience with a newer Dimensity chipset, while the Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro leverages the proven power of the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which tablet offers the best value and performance.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro emerges as the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset provides a noticeable performance edge, particularly in sustained workloads and gaming, and the 67W charging significantly reduces downtime. While the Moto Pad 60 Pro is a capable device, the Xiaomi offers a more refined and powerful experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | N/A | N/A |
| 3G bands | N/A | N/A |
| 4G bands | N/A | - |
| EDGE | No | N/A |
| GPRS | No | N/A |
| Technology | No cellular connectivity | No cellular connectivity |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, April 17 | 2023, April 18 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, April 23 | Available. Released 2023, April 30 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum frame, aluminum back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, aluminum back |
| Dimensions | 291.8 x 189.1 x 6.9 mm (11.49 x 7.44 x 0.27 in) | 254 x 165.2 x 6.5 mm (10.0 x 6.50 x 0.26 in) |
| SIM | No | No |
| Weight | 620 g (1.37 lb) | 490 g (1.08 lb) |
| | - | Stylus support (magnetic) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 2944 x 1840 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~273 ppi density) | 1800 x 2880 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~309 ppi density) |
| Size | 12.7 inches, 467.7 cm2 (~84.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 11.0 inches, 350.9 cm2 (~83.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 144Hz, HDR10, 400 nits | IPS LCD, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10, Dolby Vision, 550 nits |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8300 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali G615-MC6 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 14, up to 2 major Android upgrades | Android 13, MIUI 14 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 13 MP, (wide), AF | - |
| Video | Yes | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS | No |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2, DisplayPort, OTG, accessory connector pins | USB Type-C 3.2, accessory connector |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/a/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only), compass | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only) |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 45W wired
Reverse wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 1 hour |
| Type | Li-Po 10200 mAh | Li-Po 8600 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Pantone: Bronze Green | Black, Blue, Gold |
| Models | - | 23046RP50C |
| Price | About 280 EUR | About 330 EUR |
Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro
- Potentially better thermal management due to Dimensity 8300's architecture.
- Reverse wired charging offers added versatility.
- Competitive price point (likely).
- Slower 45W charging.
- Dimensity 8300 chipset may not match Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 in sustained performance.
- Camera performance likely trails the Xiaomi.
Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro
- Faster 67W charging for quick top-ups.
- Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 delivers superior performance, especially in gaming.
- Qualcomm ISP generally provides better image processing.
- May run slightly warmer under heavy load.
- Potentially higher price.
- No reverse wired charging.
Display Comparison
Both tablets likely feature LCD panels, a common choice in this price bracket. However, detailed display specs (resolution, refresh rate, peak brightness) are missing. The Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro’s potential for higher peak brightness, given its flagship positioning, could translate to better outdoor visibility. The absence of LTPO technology on either device suggests a standard refresh rate, impacting power efficiency during dynamic content. Bezels are likely comparable, focusing on maximizing screen real estate.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are sparse, but the focus should be on the main sensor. Without specific megapixel counts or aperture information, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, Qualcomm’s image signal processor (ISP) within the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 generally delivers superior image processing, particularly in low-light conditions. The Motorola’s Dimensity 8300 ISP is capable, but likely trails the Snapdragon in overall image quality. The presence or absence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) would be a crucial differentiator, but is currently unknown.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm) boasts a Cortex-X2 prime core clocked at 3.19 GHz, designed for peak performance, alongside three Cortex-A710 cores and four Cortex-A510 cores. This contrasts with the Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro’s MediaTek Dimensity 8300 (4nm), featuring a Cortex-A715 prime core at 3.35 GHz, three more Cortex-A715 cores, and four Cortex-A510 cores. While the Dimensity 8300 has a higher clocked prime core, the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1’s architecture is optimized for sustained performance and thermal management. The Snapdragon’s Adreno 730 GPU is also a significant advantage for gaming. Both devices likely utilize LPDDR5x RAM, but the Xiaomi’s superior chipset will better leverage its bandwidth.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified, but the charging speeds are a clear win for the Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro. Its 67W wired charging, supporting PD3.0 and QC4, promises a full charge in approximately one hour. The Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro’s 45W charging is considerably slower. While a larger battery on the Motorola could partially offset this, the convenience of rapid charging on the Xiaomi is a significant advantage for users who need to quickly top up their device.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro if you prioritize a potentially cooler running device during extended use and are comfortable with slightly slower charging speeds. It's a solid all-rounder for everyday tasks and light gaming. Buy the Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro if you demand maximum performance for demanding apps, gaming, or multitasking, and value the convenience of significantly faster 67W charging. It’s the better choice for power users and gamers.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 in the Xiaomi Pad 6 Pro throttle during extended gaming sessions?
While the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is a powerful chip, it can generate heat under sustained load. However, Qualcomm’s thermal management technologies and the tablet’s form factor should mitigate throttling to a reasonable degree, providing a consistently high frame rate for most games. The Motorola's Dimensity 8300 may run cooler, but at the cost of peak performance.
❓ Does the Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro support any stylus functionality or keyboard accessories?
Information on stylus and keyboard support for the Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro is currently limited. Given its positioning as a productivity-focused tablet, it’s likely to support at least basic stylus input. Keyboard accessory compatibility will depend on Motorola’s ecosystem and available accessories.
❓ How does the Dimensity 8300's CPU core configuration impact real-world performance compared to the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1?
The Dimensity 8300's use of multiple Cortex-A715 cores aims to provide strong multi-core performance. However, the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1's Cortex-X2 prime core offers a significant advantage in single-core tasks and burst performance, which is crucial for responsiveness and demanding applications. The Snapdragon's architecture is also more refined for sustained workloads.
