Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro vs Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025): A Deep Dive Comparison

The tablet market is heating up, with Motorola and Huawei both vying for dominance. The Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro offers a compelling blend of performance and value, while the Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) aims for a premium experience with its Kirin T92 chipset and focus on rapid charging. This comparison dissects the key differences to help you choose the right tablet for your needs.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user prioritizing fast charging and a potentially smoother software experience (depending on Huawei's HarmonyOS implementation), the Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) is the better choice. However, the Moto Pad 60 Pro provides a strong performance foundation with the Dimensity 8300 at a potentially lower price point.

PHONES
Phone Names Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)
Network
2G bandsN/AGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsN/AHSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100
4G bandsN/ALTE
EDGENo-
GPRSNo-
Speed-HSPA, LTE - cellular model only
TechnologyNo cellular connectivityGSM / HSPA / LTE
Launch
Announced2025, April 172024, November 26
StatusAvailable. Released 2025, April 23Available. Released 2024, December 12
Body
BuildGlass front, aluminum frame, aluminum backGlass front, nylon fiber back, magnesium alloy frame
Dimensions291.8 x 189.1 x 6.9 mm (11.49 x 7.44 x 0.27 in)289.1 x 196.1 x 5.5 mm (11.38 x 7.72 x 0.22 in)
SIMNoNano-SIM (cellular model only)
Weight620 g (1.37 lb)580 g (Wi-FI) or 590 g (LTE) (1.28 lb)
Display
Resolution2944 x 1840 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~273 ppi density)2880 x 1920 pixels, 3:2 ratio (~262 ppi density)
Size12.7 inches, 467.7 cm2 (~84.8% screen-to-body ratio)13.2 inches, 518.8 cm2 (~91.5% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeIPS LCD, 144Hz, HDR10, 400 nitsOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR Vivid, 1000 nits (peak)
Platform
CPUOcta-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510)Octa-core
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 8300 (4 nm)Kirin T92
GPUMali G615-MC6-
OSAndroid 14, up to 2 major Android upgradesHarmony OS 4.3
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXCNo
Internal128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM
Main Camera
Dual-50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide)
FeaturesLED flashLED flash
Single13 MP, (wide), AF-
VideoYes4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps
Selfie camera
Single8 MP16 MP, f/2.2
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Sound
35mm jackNoNo
Loudspeaker Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers)Yes, with stereo speakers (6 speakers)
Comms
Bluetooth5.3, A2DP, LE5.2, A2DP, LE, L2HC
NFCNoNo
PositioningGPS, GALILEO, GLONASSGPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS
RadioNoNo
USBUSB Type-C 3.2, DisplayPort, OTG, accessory connector pinsUSB Type-C 3.1, OTG, DisplayPort 1.2, accessory connector pins
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band
Features
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only), compassFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity (accessories only)
Battery
Charging45W wired Reverse wired100W wired 7.5W reverse wired
TypeLi-Po 10200 mAhLi-Po 10100 mAh
Misc
ColorsPantone: Bronze GreenBlack, White, Gold
Models-WEB-W00, PCE-W29
PriceAbout 280 EURAbout 680 EUR

Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro

  • Potentially more affordable price point
  • Strong performance from the Dimensity 8300
  • 45W fast charging is still respectable

  • Slower charging compared to the Huawei MatePad Pro
  • May have a smaller display, less ideal for productivity

Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025)

  • Ultra-fast 100W charging
  • Potentially optimized performance with the Kirin T92 and HarmonyOS
  • Larger 13.2-inch display for enhanced productivity

  • Likely a higher price tag
  • HarmonyOS may not appeal to all users

Display Comparison

While display specifications are missing for both devices, the 13.2-inch screen size of the Huawei MatePad Pro immediately suggests a focus on media consumption and productivity. The Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro, likely featuring a smaller display, may be more portable. The absence of refresh rate or panel type information makes a direct comparison difficult, but Huawei typically employs high-quality panels in its Pro series, potentially offering superior color accuracy and viewing angles. The larger screen real estate of the MatePad Pro will be a boon for multitasking and creative workflows.

Camera Comparison

Camera details are absent for both tablets, making a meaningful comparison impossible. However, tablets are rarely purchased for their camera capabilities. Expect both devices to feature adequate cameras for video conferencing and casual snapshots. The presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on either device would be a significant advantage, but this information is currently unavailable. Given Huawei’s history with camera technology, the MatePad Pro might have a slight edge in image processing, but this is speculative.

Performance

The core of the performance difference lies in the chipsets. The Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 8300 (4nm), an octa-core processor designed for efficiency and strong multi-core performance. The Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) counters with the Kirin T92. While core count is similar, the Kirin T92’s architecture and manufacturing process (likely also 4nm, but details are needed) will dictate real-world performance. The Dimensity 8300’s Cortex-A715 cores, while capable, may be slightly less efficient than the cores found in the Kirin T92. The Huawei tablet’s chipset is likely optimized for Huawei’s HarmonyOS, potentially leading to smoother animations and better resource management. The lack of RAM specifications prevents a full assessment, but LPDDR5x support is expected on both, ensuring fast memory access.

Battery Life

The Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) boasts a significant advantage in charging speed with its 100W wired charging capability. This will dramatically reduce charging times compared to the Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro’s 45W charging. While battery capacity is unknown for both, the faster charging of the Huawei tablet mitigates the impact of a potentially smaller battery. The 7.5W reverse wired charging on both devices is a convenient feature for topping up accessories, but is relatively slow compared to the primary charging speeds.

Buying Guide

Buy the Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro if you need a powerful tablet for everyday tasks, light gaming, and content creation, and value a balance between performance and affordability. Buy the Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) if you prioritize incredibly fast charging, potentially benefit from Huawei’s ecosystem integration, and are willing to pay a premium for a more refined user experience and potentially superior thermal management due to the Kirin T92’s architecture.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ How much faster is the 100W charging on the Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) compared to the 45W charging on the Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro?
While exact charging times depend on battery capacity (currently unknown), 100W charging will significantly reduce the time to reach a full charge. Expect the Huawei tablet to charge from 0-100% in considerably less time than the Motorola, potentially cutting charging time in half or even more.
❓ Will the Kirin T92 chipset in the Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) offer a noticeable performance improvement over the Dimensity 8300 in the Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro for demanding tasks like video editing?
The Kirin T92 is likely optimized for Huawei’s HarmonyOS, potentially offering better performance in tasks specifically tailored to that ecosystem. However, the Dimensity 8300 is a very capable chipset and will handle most tasks with ease. The difference in performance will likely be noticeable in sustained workloads, where thermal management and power efficiency become critical.
❓ Does the Huawei MatePad Pro 13.2 (2025) support Google Play Services, or am I limited to Huawei’s AppGallery?
This is a crucial consideration. Huawei’s MatePad Pro series typically relies on Huawei’s AppGallery and HMS (Huawei Mobile Services) instead of Google Play Services. While AppGallery has grown, it still lacks some popular apps. Workarounds exist, but they can be complex and may not be stable.