The Android tablet market is heating up, with Motorola and Xiaomi offering compelling options at different price points. The Motorola Moto Pad 60 Neo aims for affordability with a capable mid-range chipset, while the Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro 12.4 throws down the gauntlet with flagship-level performance and rapid charging. This comparison dissects the key differences to help you choose the right tablet for your workflow and entertainment.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw power and a premium experience, the Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro 12.4 is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset and 120W charging significantly outperform the Moto Pad 60 Neo. However, the Moto Pad 60 Neo remains a viable option for budget-conscious users who don't demand the absolute best performance.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | N/A |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | N/A |
| 4G bands | LTE | - |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA/Sub6 | - |
| EDGE | - | N/A |
| GPRS | - | N/A |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | - |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | No cellular connectivity |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, September 12 | 2024, February 22 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, September 22 | Available. Released 2024, February 22 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum frame, aluminum back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame, aluminum back |
| Dimensions | 254.6 x 166.2 x 7 mm (10.02 x 6.54 x 0.28 in) | 278.7 x 191.6 x 6.3 mm (10.97 x 7.54 x 0.25 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | No |
| Weight | 480 g (1.06 lb) | 590 g (1.30 lb) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1600 x 2560 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~274 ppi density) | 2032 x 3048 pixels, 3:2 ratio (~295 ppi density) |
| Size | 11.0 inches, 350.9 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 12.4 inches, 457.8 cm2 (~85.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 500 nits | IPS LCD, 68B colors, 144Hz, HDR10, Dolby Vision, 900 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, (wide) | - |
| Video | Yes | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP | 32 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.6", 0.61µm |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers, Dolby Atmos (4 speakers) | Yes, with stereo speakers (6 speakers) |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE, LHDC |
| NFC | No | Yes (file transfer only) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS | No |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.2, accessory connector |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/a/6/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity (accessories only) | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only), compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 20W wired | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 45% in 10 min, 100% in 35 min |
| Type | 7040 mAh | 10000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Pantone: Bronze Green | Black, Blue, Green |
| Models | - | 24018RPACG |
| Price | About 170 EUR | About 700 EUR |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (body) |
Motorola Moto Pad 60 Neo
- More affordable price point
- Decent performance for everyday tasks
- Sufficient for casual gaming
- Significantly slower charging
- Less powerful chipset
- Likely inferior display quality
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro 12.4
- Flagship Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 performance
- Ultra-fast 120W charging
- Superior display brightness and contrast
- Higher price tag
- May be overkill for basic users
- Potentially larger and heavier form factor
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro 12.4 boasts a superior display experience. While both tablets lack detailed display specs beyond size, the Xiaomi’s measured 848 nits of peak brightness significantly exceeds what we’d expect from the Moto Pad 60 Neo, making it far more usable outdoors. The 1378:1 contrast ratio on the Xiaomi further enhances visual fidelity. The larger screen size of the Xiaomi also contributes to a more immersive viewing experience. We anticipate the Moto Pad 60 Neo will have a decent display for its price point, but it won’t compete with the Xiaomi’s clarity and vibrancy.
Camera Comparison
Given the tablet form factor, camera performance isn't a primary concern for most users. However, the Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro 12.4 is likely to offer a more refined camera experience due to its flagship chipset’s superior image signal processing capabilities. Without detailed camera specs for either device, it’s difficult to make a precise comparison. We can assume the Xiaomi will benefit from better dynamic range and noise reduction. The Moto Pad 60 Neo will likely suffice for casual snapshots, but won’t compete with dedicated cameras or even higher-end smartphone cameras.
Performance
The performance gap between these tablets is substantial. The Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro 12.4’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm) is a flagship chipset built for demanding workloads. Its octa-core configuration, featuring a Cortex-X3 prime core clocked at 3.2 GHz, provides a significant performance uplift over the Motorola’s Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6nm). The Dimensity 6300, while capable, is geared towards mid-range performance. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s 4nm process also offers superior thermal efficiency, minimizing throttling during extended gaming sessions. The Xiaomi will handle graphically intensive games and multitasking with ease, while the Moto Pad 60 Neo may struggle with the most demanding applications.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro 12.4’s 120W wired charging is a game-changer. Achieving a 45% charge in just 10 minutes and a full charge in 35 minutes is significantly faster than the Moto Pad 60 Neo’s 20W charging. While the Xiaomi’s active use battery score of 11:14h is impressive, the rapid charging capability mitigates any concerns about battery life. The Moto Pad 60 Neo will take considerably longer to charge, making it less convenient for users who need a quick power boost.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Moto Pad 60 Neo if you need a capable tablet for everyday tasks like browsing, streaming, and light productivity, and value affordability above all else. Buy the Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro 12.4 if you prioritize demanding tasks like gaming, video editing, and multitasking, and are willing to pay a premium for top-tier performance and incredibly fast charging.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ How much faster is the 120W charging on the Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro 12.4 compared to the 20W charging on the Moto Pad 60 Neo in real-world use?
The Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro 12.4 can go from 0-100% in approximately 35 minutes, while the Moto Pad 60 Neo will likely take over 2 hours. This means you can quickly top up the Xiaomi during short breaks, whereas the Moto Pad 60 Neo requires a much longer charging period, making it less convenient for users on the go.
❓ Will the Mediatek Dimensity 6300 in the Moto Pad 60 Neo be sufficient for playing demanding games like Genshin Impact or Call of Duty Mobile?
While the Dimensity 6300 can run these games, you'll likely need to lower the graphics settings to achieve a smooth frame rate. The Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro 12.4’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 will handle these games at maximum settings without any noticeable lag or stuttering.
❓ Does the Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro 12.4 experience significant thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s 4nm process is designed for improved thermal efficiency. While some throttling is inevitable during prolonged, intensive gaming, the Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro 12.4 is expected to manage heat more effectively than the Moto Pad 60 Neo, maintaining higher sustained performance.
