The Motorola Moto Pad 60 Neo and Lenovo Tab P11 Gen 2 represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range tablet space. Both devices leverage Mediatek chipsets, but differ in their implementation and target user. This comparison dives deep into the nuances of each tablet to determine which one delivers the best overall experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing consistent performance and a slightly more modern chipset, the Motorola Moto Pad 60 Neo emerges as the winner. Its Dimensity 6300 offers a small but noticeable edge in CPU performance, making it better suited for multitasking and demanding applications, despite both tablets sharing similar RAM configurations.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA/Sub6 | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE - cellular model only |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, September 12 | 2022, September 01 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, September 22 | Available. Released 2023, January |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum frame, aluminum back | - |
| Dimensions | 254.6 x 166.2 x 7 mm (10.02 x 6.54 x 0.28 in) | 269.1 x 169.4 x 7.4 mm (10.59 x 6.67 x 0.29 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM (cellular model only) |
| Weight | 480 g (1.06 lb) | 520 g (1.15 lb) |
| | - | Stylus support |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1600 x 2560 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~274 ppi density) | 1200 x 2000 pixels, 5:3 ratio (~203 ppi density) |
| Size | 11.0 inches, 350.9 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 11.5 inches, 376.4 cm2 (~82.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 500 nits | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 400 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 12L |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash |
| Single | 8 MP, (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.4, (wide), AF |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP | 8 MP, f/2.0 |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers, Dolby Atmos (4 speakers) | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS - cellular model only |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG, magnetic connector |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity (accessories only) | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 20W wired | - |
| Type | 7040 mAh | Li-Po 7700 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Pantone: Bronze Green | Storm Grey, Sage |
| Models | - | TB350FU |
| Price | About 170 EUR | About 350 EUR |
Motorola Moto Pad 60 Neo
- Slightly faster CPU clock speeds for improved responsiveness.
- More modern chipset architecture (Dimensity 6300).
- Potentially better sustained performance due to chipset design.
- Battery capacity not specified, potential for shorter runtime.
- Camera performance likely similar to the Lenovo Tab P11 Gen 2.
Lenovo Tab P11 Gen 2
- Competitive pricing likely to be a strong selling point.
- 20W fast charging for convenient power-ups.
- Well-rounded feature set for everyday tasks.
- Slightly slower CPU clock speeds compared to the Moto Pad 60 Neo.
- Older chipset architecture (Helio G99).
Display Comparison
Both tablets are expected to feature LCD panels, a common trait in this price bracket. While specific display specs like resolution and refresh rate are missing, the focus here is on processing power impacting UI smoothness. Neither device is expected to have LTPO technology. Bezels are likely comparable, given the similar screen sizes typically found in this segment. Color accuracy will likely be standard for LCDs, leaning towards acceptable rather than exceptional.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is unlikely to be a key differentiator in this segment. Both tablets will likely feature basic camera setups geared towards video calls and casual snapshots. Without specific sensor details, it’s safe to assume both will struggle in low-light conditions. The focus should be on the front-facing camera quality for video conferencing, rather than the rear cameras. Any mention of megapixel counts beyond the primary sensor should be viewed with skepticism, as image quality is more dependent on sensor size and image processing.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Motorola Moto Pad 60 Neo utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6nm) with a 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 configuration, while the Lenovo Tab P11 Gen 2 features the Mediatek Helio G99 (6nm) with a 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 setup. The Dimensity 6300’s slightly higher Cortex-A76 clock speed suggests a marginal advantage in single-core performance, translating to snappier app launches and smoother UI navigation. Both utilize the same Cortex-A55 efficiency cores, meaning multi-core performance will be relatively close. The 6nm process node on both chips ensures reasonable thermal efficiency, but the Dimensity 6300’s architecture may offer a slight edge in sustained performance under load. RAM speed (likely LPDDR4X on both) is not specified, but will be a limiting factor in overall system responsiveness.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified for either device. However, the Lenovo Tab P11 Gen 2’s 20W charging is a key consideration. While not exceptionally fast, it provides a reasonable charging speed for a tablet. The Motorola Moto Pad 60 Neo also features 20W charging, meaning charging times will be comparable. Real-world battery life will depend heavily on usage patterns, but the efficiency of the Mediatek chipsets should provide all-day battery life for moderate use cases like web browsing and video streaming.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Moto Pad 60 Neo if you need a tablet that can handle a heavier workload, such as running multiple apps simultaneously or light content creation. Its Dimensity 6300 chipset provides a slight performance advantage. Buy the Lenovo Tab P11 Gen 2 if you prioritize a well-rounded experience with a focus on media consumption and general productivity tasks, and are looking for a potentially lower price point.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Mediatek Helio G99 in the Lenovo Tab P11 Gen 2 struggle with graphically intensive games?
The Helio G99 is a capable chipset, but it's not designed for high-end gaming. While it can handle most mobile games at medium settings, demanding titles may require reduced graphics settings or experience occasional frame drops. The Dimensity 6300 in the Moto Pad 60 Neo offers a slight advantage, but neither tablet is a dedicated gaming device.
❓ How does the thermal management differ between the Motorola Moto Pad 60 Neo and the Lenovo Tab P11 Gen 2 during prolonged use?
Both tablets utilize 6nm chipsets, indicating reasonable thermal efficiency. However, the Dimensity 6300’s architecture may allow for slightly better sustained performance under load before throttling occurs. In real-world use, the difference is unlikely to be significant for typical tasks like web browsing and video streaming, but may become noticeable during extended gaming sessions.
❓ Is the difference in CPU clock speed (2.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz) between the Dimensity 6300 and Helio G99 noticeable in everyday tasks?
The 0.2 GHz difference in CPU clock speed is subtle, but it can contribute to a slightly snappier user experience on the Moto Pad 60 Neo, particularly when launching apps or multitasking. It won't be a dramatic difference, but it's a contributing factor to the overall performance advantage.
