The Motorola Moto Pad 60 Neo and the Honor Pad X9a represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive budget tablet space. While both aim to deliver a solid Android experience without breaking the bank, they take different approaches. The Moto Pad 60 Neo prioritizes a newer chipset, while the Honor Pad X9a focuses on extended battery endurance and faster charging. This comparison dives deep into the specifics to determine which tablet best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Honor Pad X9a emerges as the more practical choice. Its exceptional 92-hour endurance and 35W charging significantly outweigh the Moto Pad 60 Neo’s slightly newer chipset, especially considering the real-world performance difference is unlikely to be dramatic for typical tablet tasks.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | N/A |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | N/A |
| 4G bands | LTE | N/A |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA/Sub6 | - |
| EDGE | - | No |
| GPRS | - | No |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | - |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | No cellular connectivity |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, September 12 | 2025, March 21 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, September 22 | Available. Released 2025, March 26 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum frame, aluminum back | Glass front, aluminum frame, aluminum back |
| Dimensions | 254.6 x 166.2 x 7 mm (10.02 x 6.54 x 0.28 in) | 267.3 x 167.4 x 6.8 mm (10.52 x 6.59 x 0.27 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | No |
| Weight | 480 g (1.06 lb) | 475 g (1.05 lb) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Mohs level 4 |
| Resolution | 1600 x 2560 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~274 ppi density) | 1504 x 2508 pixels, 5:3 ratio (~254 ppi density) |
| Size | 11.0 inches, 350.9 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 11.5 inches, 376.3 cm2 (~84.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 500 nits | TFT LCD, 120Hz, 400 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 15, MagicOS 9 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | - |
| Single | 8 MP, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/5.0" |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP | 5 MP, f/2.2 |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers, Dolby Atmos (4 speakers) | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS | No |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity (accessories only) | Accelerometer |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 20W wired | 35W wired |
| Type | 7040 mAh | Li-Ion 8300 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Pantone: Bronze Green | Gray |
| Models | - | ELN2-W29 |
| Price | About 170 EUR | About 210 EUR |
| EU LABEL |
|---|
| Battery | - | 92:29h endurance, 1200 cycles |
| Energy | - | Class F |
| Free fall | - | Class E (10 falls) |
| Repairability | - | Class C |
Motorola Moto Pad 60 Neo
- More modern processor architecture (Dimensity 6300)
- Potentially better efficiency with the Dimensity 6300
- Slightly newer chipset generation
- Slower charging speed (20W)
- Significantly lower battery endurance compared to the X9a
- Lack of detailed specifications
Honor Pad X9a
- Exceptional battery life (92:29h endurance)
- Faster charging (35W)
- Long battery lifespan (1200 charge cycles)
- Older Cortex-A73 cores
- Potentially lower single-core performance
- Lack of detailed specifications
Display Comparison
Neither device’s display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the price points, we can assume both utilize IPS LCD panels. The absence of details like resolution, refresh rate, or peak brightness suggests neither is positioned as a display-centric device. Users should expect adequate, but not exceptional, viewing experiences. Bezels are likely to be similar, prioritizing affordability over premium aesthetics.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are absent for both devices. Given their market positioning, we can anticipate basic camera setups focused on casual photography. The absence of information suggests neither tablet will excel in image quality. Users should not expect flagship-level camera performance and should temper their expectations accordingly. The inclusion of a 2MP macro lens on either device would be largely superfluous.
Performance
The Motorola Moto Pad 60 Neo features the Mediatek Dimensity 6300, a 6nm chipset with an octa-core configuration (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55). The Honor Pad X9a counters with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 (also 6nm) and its own octa-core setup (4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A53). While the Dimensity 6300 utilizes newer Cortex-A76 cores, the Snapdragon 685’s higher clock speeds on its primary cores (2.8 GHz vs 2.4 GHz) suggest it may offer a slight edge in single-core performance. However, the Dimensity 6300’s architecture is more modern, potentially leading to better efficiency. The real-world difference will likely be noticeable only in sustained, demanding tasks.
Battery Life
The Honor Pad X9a boasts a significant advantage in battery endurance, rated at 92 hours and 29 minutes. This is a substantial lead over what we would expect from a tablet with a similar capacity battery. Furthermore, the X9a supports 35W wired charging, enabling faster replenishment. The Moto Pad 60 Neo, with its 20W charging, will take considerably longer to fully charge. The Honor Pad X9a’s 1200 charge cycles also suggest a longer lifespan for the battery itself, offering peace of mind for long-term users.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Moto Pad 60 Neo if you prioritize having the latest processor generation and anticipate needing slightly more processing power for demanding applications, even if it means sacrificing battery life. Buy the Honor Pad X9a if you value long-lasting battery performance, quick charging capabilities, and a tablet that can reliably power through extended use without frequent trips to the charger – ideal for travel or media consumption.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Snapdragon 685 in the Honor Pad X9a powerful enough for multitasking and light gaming?
The Snapdragon 685 is a capable chipset for everyday tasks like browsing, video streaming, and social media. It can handle light gaming, but demanding titles may require lower graphics settings. The higher clock speeds of its primary cores provide a boost for responsiveness.
❓ How long will it realistically take to fully charge the Motorola Moto Pad 60 Neo with its 20W charger?
Given the lack of battery capacity information, it's difficult to provide an exact time. However, with 20W charging, a full charge will likely take between 2.5 to 4 hours, depending on the battery size. This is significantly slower than the Honor Pad X9a’s 35W charging.
❓ What does '1200 charge cycles' mean for the Honor Pad X9a's battery?
The 1200 charge cycles rating indicates that the battery is designed to retain a significant portion of its original capacity even after being fully charged and discharged 1200 times. This suggests a longer overall battery lifespan compared to tablets with lower cycle ratings.
