Motorola Moto G86 vs Samsung Galaxy A55: A Deep Dive Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing all-day battery life and efficient performance, the Motorola Moto G86 is the clear winner. Its significantly longer endurance score (55:44h) outweighs the Galaxy A55’s brighter display for most everyday tasks. However, the A55’s superior display and Samsung’s software support make it a strong contender for media consumers.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Moto G86 | Samsung Galaxy A55 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - International | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 71 - EMEA & AP | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - EMEA & AP | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, May 29 | 2024, March 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, July 07 | Available. Released 2024, March 15 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 7i), plastic frame, silicone polymer (eco leather) back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus+), glass back (Gorilla Glass), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 161.2 x 74.7 x 7.8 mm (6.35 x 2.94 x 0.31 in) | 161.1 x 77.4 x 8.2 mm (6.34 x 3.05 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) |
| Weight | 185 g (6.53 oz) | 213 g (7.51 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i, Mohs level 4 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ |
| Resolution | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~390 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 106.9 cm2 (~85.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | P-OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 4500 nits peak | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) | Exynos 1480 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Xclipse 530 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 14, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 6.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.9, 25mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 12mm, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm, AF | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 0.7µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (with Dolby Atmos) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | 5200 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Pantone: Spellbound, Golden Cypress, Cosmic Sky, Chrysanthemum | Iceblue, Lilac, Navy, Lemon |
| Models | XT2527-2 | SM-A556V, SM-A556B, SM-A556B/DS, SM-A556E, SM-A556E/DS, SM-A5560 |
| Price | $ 269.50 / C$ 649.00 / £ 199.99 / € 198.99 | $ 324.99 / £ 251.50 / € 319.99 / ₹ 23,998 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.68 W/kg (head) 1.04 W/kg (body) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 55:44h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Motorola Moto G86
- Exceptional battery life (55:44h endurance)
- Efficient Mediatek Dimensity 7300 chipset
- Potentially faster charging (30W)
- Display likely less bright than the A55
- Camera system potentially less versatile
Samsung Galaxy A55
- Bright and vibrant display (1010 nits)
- Samsung’s One UI software experience
- Potentially more versatile camera system
- Significantly shorter battery life (13:27h)
- Slower charging speed (25W)
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A55 boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1010 nits. This is a substantial advantage for outdoor visibility, especially in direct sunlight. While the Moto G86’s display specs aren’t provided, the A55’s brightness level suggests a superior viewing experience in bright conditions. Samsung’s display technology typically offers excellent color accuracy, and the A55 likely benefits from this. The absence of LTPO technology on either device means refresh rate scaling won’t be as efficient as on flagship models, but both likely offer a standard 120Hz panel.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is challenging. However, the market positioning suggests the Galaxy A55 will likely have a more versatile camera system. Samsung typically focuses on image processing that produces vibrant, shareable photos. The Moto G86 will likely prioritize accurate color reproduction. The presence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on the A55 (likely) would be a significant advantage for low-light photography and video recording. The usefulness of a 2MP macro camera on either device is questionable, as image quality is often subpar.
Performance
Both the Moto G86 and Galaxy A55 utilize 4nm chipsets – the Mediatek Dimensity 7300 and the Exynos 1480 respectively. The Galaxy A55’s CPU has a slightly higher peak clock speed (2.75 GHz vs 2.5 GHz), potentially offering a marginal performance boost in CPU-intensive tasks. However, the Dimensity 7300’s Cortex-A78 cores are known for their efficiency. Real-world performance will depend on software optimization and thermal management. The A55’s GPU is likely to offer a slight edge in gaming, but the G86’s efficient chipset could lead to less throttling during extended gaming sessions. RAM speed (LPDDR5x is expected on both) will also play a role, but the chipset is the primary differentiator.
Battery Life
The Motorola Moto G86’s standout feature is its exceptional battery endurance, rated at 55:44 hours. This is significantly longer than the Samsung Galaxy A55’s 13:27 hours of active use. While the A55’s battery capacity isn’t specified, the G86’s endurance suggests a larger battery or significantly more efficient power management. The G86 supports 30W wired charging, while the A55 offers 25W. This means the G86 will likely charge slightly faster, but neither offers the blazing-fast charging speeds of some competitors. The G86’s 1000 charge cycle rating suggests a longer lifespan for the battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Moto G86 if you need a phone that can reliably last through two full days of moderate use, and value efficient performance over peak graphical power. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A55 if you prioritize a bright, vivid display for content consumption, prefer Samsung’s One UI software experience, and are willing to compromise on battery endurance for these features.