Poco X6 Pro vs. Motorola Moto G85: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro emerges as the stronger contender. Its significantly more powerful Dimensity 8300 Ultra chipset, coupled with 67W fast charging, provides a superior experience for gaming and demanding tasks. While the Moto G85 offers a respectable package, it can't match the X6 Pro's raw performance.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Moto G85 | Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, June 25 | 2024, January 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, June 25 | Available. Released 2024, January 12 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back or silicone polymer (eco leather) back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) |
| Dimensions | 161.9 x 73.1 x 7.6 mm (6.37 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) | 160.5 x 74.3 x 8.3 mm (6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 171 g or 173 g (6.03 oz) | 186 g or 190 g (6.56 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~90.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | P-OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 1600 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 500 nits (typ), 1200 nits (HBM), 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali G615-MC6 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8 (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm, AF | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@24/30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 0.7µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS (B1I+B1c) |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired - International 33W wired - India | 67W wired, QC2.0, PD3.0, 100% in 45 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Olive Green, Cobalt Blue, Urban Grey, Magenta | Black, Yellow, Gray |
| Models | XT2427-3 | 2311DRK48G, 2311DRK48I |
| Price | $ 289.99 / C$ 287.10 / £ 214.58 / € 194.79 | € 195.30 / $ 209.79 / £ 274.99 / ₹ 21,999 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
Motorola Moto G85
- Potentially cleaner software experience (Motorola's near-stock Android)
- More efficient processor for longer battery life during light use
- Likely more affordable price point
- Significantly weaker performance compared to the Poco X6 Pro
- Slower charging speeds
- Less vibrant display
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro
- Exceptional performance with the Dimensity 8300 Ultra
- 67W fast charging for quick top-ups
- Brighter and more vibrant display
- Xiaomi's MIUI software can be bloated with pre-installed apps
- Potentially higher price
- May run warmer under heavy load
Display Comparison
The Poco X6 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1148 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the Moto G85. This higher peak brightness translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While panel technology details for the G85 are missing, the X6 Pro’s brightness advantage is substantial. Both are likely to use AMOLED panels, but the X6 Pro’s superior brightness and likely higher contrast ratio will provide a more immersive viewing experience. Bezels are expected to be similar, given the market segment, but the X6 Pro’s display is the clear winner in terms of raw specifications.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specs beyond 'Photo/Video' are absent for the Poco X6 Pro, but Xiaomi typically equips its 'Pro' models with capable sensors. The Moto G85’s camera performance is likely to be solid for its price point, but it will likely lack the advanced features and image processing capabilities of the X6 Pro. Without specific sensor details for the X6 Pro, it’s reasonable to assume a larger main sensor and potentially optical image stabilization (OIS), offering better low-light performance and sharper images. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely a marketing gimmick and shouldn't heavily influence purchasing decisions.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco X6 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra, built on a 4nm process, is a substantial leap ahead of the Motorola Moto G85’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 (6nm). The Dimensity 8300 Ultra features a more complex CPU configuration – 1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715, 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715, and 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510 – compared to the G85’s 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55. This translates to significantly faster processing speeds and improved multitasking capabilities for the X6 Pro. The 4nm node also contributes to better thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during extended gaming sessions. While the G85 is adequate for everyday tasks, the X6 Pro is designed for demanding users.
Battery Life
The Poco X6 Pro delivers a compelling battery and charging combination. Its active use score of 11:46h indicates strong battery life, and the 67W wired charging, supporting QC2.0 and PD3.0, can fully charge the device in just 45 minutes. The Moto G85 offers 30W (International) or 33W (India) wired charging, which is considerably slower. While the G85 may have a slightly larger battery capacity (unspecified), the X6 Pro’s faster charging significantly reduces downtime. The X6 Pro’s charging speed is a major convenience factor for users who frequently need to top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Moto G85 if you prioritize a clean software experience, efficient power consumption for all-day use, and a more compact form factor. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro if you demand top-tier performance for gaming and multitasking, require faster charging speeds, and value a brighter, more vibrant display. The X6 Pro is the clear choice for power users.