Moto G82 vs Poco X4 Pro 5G: Which 5G Phone Delivers the Best Value?

Both the Motorola Moto G82 and the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G target the competitive mid-range 5G smartphone market. While both leverage the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G chipset, they diverge significantly in charging speed and, consequently, user experience. This comparison dissects these differences to help you choose the right device.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For most users, the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G emerges as the stronger choice. Its 67W charging capability, achieving a full charge in just 41 minutes, is a game-changer compared to the Moto G82’s 30W charging. While both phones share the same chipset, the Poco’s faster refueling makes it ideal for power users.

PHONES
Phone Names Motorola Moto G82 Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - Global
4G bands1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 661, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 - Global
5G bands1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 78 SA/NSA1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Global
SpeedHSPA, LTE, 5GHSPA, LTE, 5G
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5GGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G
 -1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA - India
Launch
Announced2022, May 122022, February 28
StatusAvailable. Released 2022, June 07Available. Released 2022, March 23
Body
BuildGlass front, plastic frame, plastic backGlass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame
Dimensions160.9 x 74.5 x 8 mm (6.33 x 2.93 x 0.31 in)164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight173 g (6.10 oz)205 g (7.23 oz)
 Water-repellent designIP53, dust and splash resistant
Display
Protection-Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Resolution1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density)1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density)
Size6.6 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~86.4% screen-to-body ratio)6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeAMOLED, 120HzSuper AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak)
Platform
CPUOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver)Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver)
ChipsetQualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm)Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm)
GPUAdreno 619Adreno 619
OSAndroid 12, upgradable to Android 13Android 11, MIUI 13 for POCO
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXC (uses shared SIM slot)microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot)
Internal128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM
 UFSUFS 2.2
Main Camera
FeaturesLED flash, HDR, panoramaLED flash, HDR, panorama
Single-16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm
Triple50 MP, f/1.8 (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro)108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF - Global version 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF - India version 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro)
Video1080p@30/60fps1080p@30fps
Selfie camera
Features-HDR, panorama
Single16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Sound
3.5mm jack YesYes
35mm jackYesYes
Loudspeaker Yes, with stereo speakersYes, with stereo speakers
 -24-bit/192kHz audio
Comms
Bluetooth5.1, A2DP, LE5.1, A2DP, LE
Infrared port-Yes
NFCYes (market/region dependent)Yes (market/region dependent)
PositioningGPS, GLONASS, GALILEOGPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO
RadioFM radio (market/region dependent)FM radio
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 2.0, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Battery
Charging30W wired67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 70% in 22 min, 100% in 41 min
TypeLi-Po 5000 mAhLi-Po 5000 mAh
Misc
ColorsMeteorite Gray, White LilyLaser Black, Laser Blue, Poco Yellow
ModelsXT2225-12201116PG
PriceAbout 290 EUR€ 160.40 / $ 419.99 / £ 255.00 / ₹ 12,940
SAR-1.06 W/kg (head)     1.09 W/kg (body)
SAR EU-0.60 W/kg (head)     0.96 W/kg (body)
Tests
Battery life Endurance rating 130h Endurance rating 119h
Camera Photo / Video Photo / Video
Display Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal)
Loudspeaker -26.4 LUFS (Good) -26.8 LUFS (Good)
Performance AnTuTu: 380812 (v9) GeekBench: 1977 (v5.1) GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) AnTuTu: 335353 (v8), 384646 (v9) GeekBench: 2063 (v5.1) GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

Motorola Moto G82

  • Slightly brighter display for better outdoor visibility.
  • Potentially longer battery life based on endurance rating.
  • Motorola’s cleaner Android software experience.

  • Significantly slower 30W charging.
  • Limited camera details make performance uncertain.

Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G

  • 67W fast charging – a major time saver.
  • Faster charging offsets slightly lower endurance rating.
  • Competitive price point within the mid-range segment.

  • MIUI software can be resource-intensive and feature bloat.
  • Display brightness is lower than the Moto G82.

Display Comparison

Both the Moto G82 and Poco X4 Pro 5G feature displays with an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting deep blacks. However, the Moto G82 boasts a measured peak brightness of 690 nits, offering better visibility in direct sunlight. While both likely utilize AMOLED panels (implied by the contrast ratio), the G82’s higher brightness is a tangible advantage for outdoor use. Details regarding refresh rates and panel technology (LTPO, PWM dimming) are missing, but the G82’s brightness is a clear differentiator.

Camera Comparison

Both phones list 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details regarding sensor size, aperture, or optical image stabilization (OIS). This makes a direct comparison difficult. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on both devices is likely a marketing feature with limited real-world utility. Without further information, it’s safe to assume camera performance will be similar, leaning towards adequate for social media sharing but not excelling in low-light conditions.

Performance

Both devices are powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm), featuring an octa-core CPU configuration with 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold and 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver cores. This means performance will be largely identical for everyday tasks and moderate gaming. The absence of information regarding RAM type (LPDDR4x vs LPDDR5) and storage speed (UFS 2.2 vs UFS 3.1) prevents a deeper analysis, but the shared chipset ensures comparable processing power. Thermal management will likely be similar, given the 6nm process node.

Battery Life

The Moto G82 offers an endurance rating of 130 hours, while the Poco X4 Pro 5G achieves 119 hours. This suggests the G82 has slightly better battery optimization or a marginally larger battery capacity (specific mAh figures are missing). However, this advantage is overshadowed by the Poco X4 Pro 5G’s significantly faster 67W charging. The Poco X4 Pro can reach 70% charge in 22 minutes and 100% in 41 minutes, a substantial improvement over the G82’s 30W charging. This faster charging mitigates any potential battery life disadvantage.

Buying Guide

Buy the Motorola Moto G82 if you prioritize a slightly brighter display (690 nits) and prefer Motorola’s near-stock Android experience. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G if you value significantly faster charging speeds, minimizing downtime and maximizing usability throughout the day, and don't mind Xiaomi's MIUI software.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ How much faster is the Poco X4 Pro 5G's charging compared to the Moto G82 in a typical use case?
The Poco X4 Pro 5G can gain a substantial charge during a short break. While the Moto G82 is charging, you could be using the Poco X4 Pro. A 22-minute charge on the Poco X4 Pro will get you to 70%, while the Moto G82 will barely be halfway there. This is a significant advantage for users who frequently need to top up their battery.
❓ Does the Snapdragon 695 5G in either phone struggle with demanding games like PUBG or Genshin Impact?
The Snapdragon 695 5G is a capable chipset for casual gaming, but it will likely struggle with graphically intensive titles like PUBG or Genshin Impact at high settings. Expect to lower graphics settings and potentially frame rates for a smoother experience on both devices. The shared chipset means performance will be very similar in these scenarios.
❓ Are the software experiences on the Moto G82 and Poco X4 Pro 5G drastically different?
Yes. The Moto G82 runs a near-stock Android experience, offering a clean and minimalist interface. The Poco X4 Pro 5G utilizes Xiaomi’s MIUI, which is heavily customized with additional features, themes, and pre-installed apps. MIUI can be polarizing; some users appreciate the customization options, while others find it bloated and intrusive.