Moto G82 vs Galaxy A52s 5G: Which Mid-Range 5G Phone Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G emerges as the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 778G chipset provides a noticeable performance uplift over the Moto G82’s Snapdragon 695, translating to smoother multitasking and gaming. While the Moto G82 boasts respectable battery life, the A52s 5G’s brighter display and more efficient processor make it the more well-rounded device.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Moto G82 | Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 12 | 2021, August 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, June 07 | Available. Released 2021, September 01 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back |
| Dimensions | 160.9 x 74.5 x 8 mm (6.33 x 2.93 x 0.31 in) | 159.9 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 173 g (6.10 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| Water-repellent design | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~86.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8 (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio (market/region dependent) | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual Proximity Sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Meteorite Gray, White Lily | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Purple, Awesome Mint |
| Models | XT2225-1 | SM-A528B, SM-A528B/DS, SM-A528N |
| Price | About 290 EUR | £ 112.98 / € 249.47 |
| SAR | - | 0.72 W/kg (head) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.88 W/kg (head) 0.84 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 130h | Endurance rating 113h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -26.4 LUFS (Good) | -27.5 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 380812 (v9) GeekBench: 1977 (v5.1) GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 429675 (v8), 506432(v9) GeekBench: 11060 (v4.4), 2801 (v5.1) GFXBench: 28fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Motorola Moto G82
- Longer battery endurance rating (130h)
- Faster 30W wired charging
- Potentially more affordable price point
- Less powerful Snapdragon 695 chipset
- Dimmer display (690 nits)
- Potentially slower app loading times
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
- More powerful Snapdragon 778G chipset
- Brighter display (800 nits)
- Superior gaming performance
- Shorter battery endurance rating (113h)
- Slower 25W wired charging
- Potentially higher price point
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G clearly leads in display quality, achieving a measured peak brightness of 800 nits compared to the Moto G82’s 690 nits. This 110-nit difference is significant for outdoor visibility, making the A52s 5G far more usable in direct sunlight. Both devices share an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting similar black levels, but the higher brightness of the A52s 5G will result in a more dynamic and visually appealing image. While both likely utilize AMOLED panels, the A52s 5G’s superior brightness is a key differentiator.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer a 'Photo / Video' camera experience, but specifics are limited. Without detailed sensor information, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, the Snapdragon 778G in the A52s 5G generally provides superior image signal processing (ISP) capabilities, potentially leading to better dynamic range and noise reduction. The A52s 5G’s ISP is likely more advanced, offering features like improved night mode performance and more accurate color reproduction. We can assume both phones will have a standard array of camera modes, but the A52s 5G has the edge in processing power.
Performance
The core difference between these phones lies in their chipsets. The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G is powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (6nm), featuring a prime Cortex-A78 core clocked at 2.4 GHz. This is a substantial upgrade over the Motorola Moto G82’s Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm), which utilizes Kryo 660 Gold cores peaking at 2.2 GHz. The 778G’s architecture, with its more powerful core and improved GPU, translates to a smoother experience in graphically intensive tasks and a more responsive user interface. The A52s 5G will handle demanding games with higher frame rates and fewer stutters.
Battery Life
The Motorola Moto G82 boasts an endurance rating of 130 hours, while the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G achieves 113 hours. This suggests the Moto G82 offers slightly better battery life under similar usage conditions. However, the A52s 5G compensates with faster 25W wired charging, while the G82 supports 30W. While the G82 has a higher wattage, the A52s 5G’s more efficient chipset may minimize the impact of the smaller battery capacity, potentially leading to comparable real-world usage times, especially for moderate users.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Moto G82 if you prioritize maximizing battery life and are primarily a casual user who doesn’t heavily rely on demanding applications. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G if you value a brighter, more vibrant display and require a more responsive experience for gaming, multitasking, and content creation. The A52s 5G is the better option for power users.