Motorola Moto G82 vs OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite: The Ultimate Budget Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite takes the lead thanks to its significantly faster charging and generally more modern software experience. However, the Moto G82 boasts a brighter display and exceptional battery life, making it a strong contender for users prioritizing longevity and screen visibility. Ultimately, charging speed is the deciding factor.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Moto G82 | OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 12 | 2023, April 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, June 07 | Available. Released 2023, April 11 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 160.9 x 74.5 x 8 mm (6.33 x 2.93 x 0.31 in) | 165.5 x 76 x 8.3 mm (6.52 x 2.99 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 173 g (6.10 oz) | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| Water-repellent design | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~391 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~86.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.72 inches, 109.6 cm2 (~87.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 550 nits (typ), 680 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13 | Android 13, OxygenOS 13.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8 (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio (market/region dependent) | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired | 67W wired, 80% in 30 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Meteorite Gray, White Lily | Pastel Lime, Chromatic Gray |
| Models | XT2225-1 | CPH2467, CPH2465 |
| Price | About 290 EUR | £ 169.98 / € 209.99 |
| SAR | - | 1.17 W/kg (head) 0.70 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 130h | - |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker | -26.4 LUFS (Good) | - |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 380812 (v9) GeekBench: 1977 (v5.1) GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 412006 (v9) GeekBench: 2052 (v5) GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Motorola Moto G82
- Exceptional battery life
- Bright and vibrant AMOLED display
- Clean Android experience
- Good value for money
- Slower charging speed
- Camera performance may not be class-leading
- Design can feel a bit generic
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite
- Ultra-fast 67W charging
- Potentially better camera detail (108MP sensor)
- Modern software experience (OxygenOS/ColorOS)
- Slightly more premium feel
- Likely LCD display (lower brightness/contrast)
- Battery life not as impressive as Moto G82
- Software updates can be inconsistent
Display Comparison
The Moto G82 features a 6.6-inch AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate and a measured peak brightness of 690 nits, offering vibrant colors and excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. The Nord CE 3 Lite likely has an LCD display (specifications not explicitly provided, but common for this price range), which will have lower brightness and contrast compared to the AMOLED panel. The Moto G82's contrast ratio is listed as 'Infinite' (nominal), indicating excellent black levels.
Camera Comparison
The Moto G82 is expected to have a versatile camera system, likely including a 50MP main sensor with OIS, an ultrawide lens, and a macro lens. The Nord CE 3 Lite is expected to have a 108MP main sensor, potentially offering more detail in well-lit conditions. Image processing and overall camera quality will depend on software optimization, which is a key differentiator. Low-light performance is an area to watch for both devices.
Performance
Both phones share the same Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G chipset and CPU configuration. Real-world performance should be similar for everyday tasks and moderate gaming. However, OnePlus' OxygenOS (or ColorOS depending on region) often provides a slightly smoother and more optimized user experience compared to Motorola's My UX, though both are relatively close to stock Android.
Battery Life
The Moto G82 shines in this category with an impressive endurance rating of 130 hours. The Nord CE 3 Lite, while having a similar battery capacity, is significantly outmatched in longevity. However, the Nord CE 3 Lite compensates with its blazing-fast 67W charging, capable of reaching 80% in just 30 minutes – a huge advantage over the Moto G82's 30W charging.
Buying Guide
The Motorola Moto G82 is ideal for users who prioritize battery life, a bright display for outdoor use, and a clean Android experience. The OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite is a better choice for those who value fast charging, a more modern software interface, and a slightly more premium feel.