Motorola Moto G82 vs Moto G71 5G: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Moto G82 edges out the G71 5G thanks to its significantly brighter display and longer battery life. While the G71 5G boasts slightly faster charging, the G82's overall improvements in screen quality and endurance make it the more compelling option for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Moto G82 | Motorola Moto G71 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat15 800/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - PRC | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 12 | 2021, November 18 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, June 07 | Available. Released 2022, January 19 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | - |
| Dimensions | 160.9 x 74.5 x 8 mm (6.33 x 2.93 x 0.31 in) | 161.2 x 73.9 x 8.5 mm (6.35 x 2.91 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 173 g (6.10 oz) | 179 g (6.31 oz) |
| Water-repellent design | Water-repellent design | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~86.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~83.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz | AMOLED |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8 (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio (market/region dependent) | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired | 30W / 33W wired, 50% in 30 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Meteorite Gray, White Lily | Neptune Green, Arctic Blue, Iron Black |
| Models | XT2225-1 | XT2169-1, XT2169-2 |
| Price | About 290 EUR | About 110 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.03 W/kg (head) 1.16 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 130h | - |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker | -26.4 LUFS (Good) | - |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 380812 (v9) GeekBench: 1977 (v5.1) GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Motorola Moto G82
- Brighter Display (690 nits)
- Exceptional Battery Life (130h Endurance)
- Good Performance with Snapdragon 695
- OLED Display
- Charging speed slightly slower than G71 5G
- Camera details limited
Motorola Moto G71 5G
- Slightly faster charging (33W)
- Compact Design (generally)
- Good Performance with Snapdragon 695
- OLED Display
- Lower Display Brightness
- Shorter Battery Life
- Camera details limited
Display Comparison
The Moto G82 takes a clear lead in the display department. Its measured peak brightness of 690 nits is noticeably higher than the G71 5G, resulting in better visibility outdoors and a more immersive viewing experience. Both phones feature OLED panels, offering excellent contrast and vibrant colors, but the G82's brightness advantage is significant. The contrast ratio is listed as 'Infinite' for the G82, which is a nominal value indicating very high contrast.
Camera Comparison
While specific camera specs are not fully detailed, both phones are advertised as having capable camera systems. The G82 is expected to have a slightly improved main sensor, potentially leading to better low-light performance and more detailed images. Video recording capabilities are likely comparable on both devices. Further testing would be needed to definitively determine the camera winner.
Performance
Both devices share the same Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G chipset and CPU configuration. This means performance will be largely similar for everyday tasks, app usage, and light gaming. Don't expect flagship-level performance from either phone, but they should handle most tasks without significant lag. Real-world performance differences will likely be minimal.
Battery Life
The Moto G82 shines in battery life, boasting an impressive endurance rating of 130 hours. This significantly surpasses the G71 5G, which, while still offering decent battery life, doesn't match the G82's longevity. The G71 5G does offer slightly faster charging (33W vs 30W), but the G82's superior battery life is a more valuable asset for many users.
Buying Guide
The Motorola Moto G82 is ideal for users prioritizing a vibrant display for media consumption and extended battery life. The Moto G71 5G is a good choice for those who value faster charging speeds and a slightly more compact design, especially if the price difference is substantial.