Motorola Moto G82 vs. Edge 40: A Head-to-Head Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Motorola Edge 40 emerges as the clear winner thanks to its significantly brighter display, faster processor, quicker charging (wired and wireless), and generally more premium feel. However, the Moto G82 offers exceptional battery life and a more budget-friendly price point.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Moto G82 | Motorola Edge 40 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 12 | 2023, May 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, June 07 | Available. Released 2023, May 04 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, aluminum frame, plastic back or eco leather back |
| Dimensions | 160.9 x 74.5 x 8 mm (6.33 x 2.93 x 0.31 in) | 158.4 x 72 x 7.6 mm (6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 173 g (6.10 oz) | 167 g or 171 g (5.89 oz) |
| Water-repellent design | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~86.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz | P-OLED, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8020 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.4, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8 (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, HDR10, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio (market/region dependent) | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| - | Moto Ready For support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired | 68W wired 15W wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4400 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Meteorite Gray, White Lily | Nebula Green, Lunar Blue, Eclipse Black, Viva Magenta |
| Models | XT2225-1 | XT2303-2 |
| Price | About 290 EUR | € 202.03 / $ 419.99 / £ 199.00 / ₹ 29,999 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 130h | Endurance rating 98h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -26.4 LUFS (Good) | -24.2 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 380812 (v9) GeekBench: 1977 (v5.1) GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 688347 (v9) GeekBench: 3320 (v5.1), 3603 (v6) GFXBench: 33fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Motorola Moto G82
- Exceptional battery life
- Affordable price
- Good display quality
- 5G connectivity
- Slower performance
- Lower brightness display
- Slower charging
Motorola Edge 40
- Brighter, higher refresh rate display
- Faster performance
- Faster charging (wired & wireless)
- Premium design
- Shorter battery life
- Higher price
Display Comparison
The Edge 40 boasts a significantly brighter display at 1043 nits compared to the G82's 690 nits. Both have excellent contrast ratios (infinite nominal), but the Edge 40's brightness makes it much more usable outdoors and in bright environments. The Edge 40 also likely has a higher refresh rate (typically 144Hz) compared to the G82 (typically 120Hz), resulting in smoother scrolling and animations.
Camera Comparison
While both phones offer capable cameras, the Edge 40 likely has a more advanced camera system with better image processing. Expect improved low-light performance and more detailed photos from the Edge 40. Both likely offer similar primary sensor resolutions, but the Edge 40's image signal processor (ISP) will make a difference. Video recording capabilities are likely comparable, but the Edge 40 might offer higher resolution options.
Performance
The Edge 40's Dimensity 8020 chipset is considerably more powerful than the G82's Snapdragon 695 5G. Expect noticeably faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and better performance in demanding games on the Edge 40. The Dimensity 8020's architecture (4x Cortex-A78 cores) is designed for higher performance.
Battery Life
The Moto G82 shines in this category with an impressive endurance rating of 130 hours, significantly outperforming the Edge 40's 98 hours. However, the Edge 40's 68W wired charging and 15W wireless charging more than compensate for the shorter battery life, allowing for much faster top-ups.
Buying Guide
The Motorola Moto G82 is ideal for users prioritizing long battery life and a more affordable price tag. It's a great choice for those who don't need the absolute fastest performance or a cutting-edge display. The Motorola Edge 40 is perfect for users who value a vibrant, high-brightness display, snappy performance, and faster charging capabilities, and are willing to spend a bit more.