Motorola Moto G75 vs. Nothing Phone (1): A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing battery life and future-proofing, the Motorola Moto G75 emerges as the stronger contender. Its Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 chipset, built on a 4nm process, offers improved efficiency and longevity compared to the Nothing Phone (1)'s 6nm Snapdragon 778G+. However, the Nothing Phone (1)'s unique aesthetic and slightly faster wired charging remain compelling advantages.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Moto G75 | Nothing Phone (1) |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 41, 42 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, October 01 | 2022, July 12 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, October 28 | Available. Released 2022, July 16 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), silicone polymer (eco leather) back or plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 166.1 x 77.2 x 8.3 mm (6.54 x 3.04 x 0.33 in) | 159.2 x 75.8 x 8.3 mm (6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 205 g or 208 g (7.23 oz) | 193.5 g (6.84 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 4 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2388 pixels (~387 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.4 cm2 (~86.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~85.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 1000 nits (HBM) | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 1440Hz PWM, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6475-AB Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325-AE Snapdragon 778G+ 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 710 | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 14, up to 5 major Android upgrades | Android 12, upgradable to Android 15, up to 3 major Android upgrades, Nothing OS 3.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm, AF | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.2, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, live HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired, 50% in 25 min 15W wireless | 33W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 50% in 30 min, 100% in 70 min 15W wireless 5W reverse wireless |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 4500 mAh (17.42 Wh) |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Charcoal Gray, Aqua Blue, Succulent Green | White, Black |
| Models | XT2437-2, XT2437-3 | A063 |
| Price | $ 215.99 / C$ 277.67 / £ 189.99 / € 189.00 | $ 539.00 / £ 234.77 / € 249.95 / ₹ 17,990 |
| SAR | - | 1.29 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.48 W/kg (body) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 48:58h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class B (180 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Motorola Moto G75
- Exceptional battery life (48:58h endurance)
- Modern Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 chipset (4nm)
- Long-lasting battery with 1000 charge cycles
- Display specifications are unknown
- Camera details are limited
Nothing Phone (1)
- Brighter display (663 nits)
- Unique transparent design
- Faster wired charging (33W)
- Older Snapdragon 778G+ chipset (6nm)
- Shorter battery life (108h endurance)
Display Comparison
The Nothing Phone (1) boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured 663 nits, which will be noticeably advantageous in direct sunlight. While the Moto G75’s display specs are not provided, the Nothing Phone (1)'s brightness is a clear win. The Nothing Phone (1) also benefits from a more refined software implementation for color accuracy, though both likely utilize OLED panels. The G75’s lack of specified display details makes a comprehensive comparison difficult, but the Nothing Phone (1) holds a clear advantage in this category.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable camera systems, but detailed sensor information is limited. The Nothing Phone (1) is known for its dual 50MP rear cameras, offering both wide and ultrawide perspectives. The Moto G75’s camera specs are not provided, making a direct sensor size comparison impossible. However, the Nothing Phone (1)'s image processing is generally considered more refined, producing consistently good results in various lighting conditions. The absence of details regarding OIS or lens apertures on the G75 makes it difficult to assess its low-light performance.
Performance
The Motorola Moto G75’s Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (4nm) represents a generational leap in efficiency compared to the Nothing Phone (1)’s Snapdragon 778G+ (6nm). While the 778G+ features a slightly higher clocked Cortex-A78 prime core (2.5 GHz vs 2.4 GHz), the G75’s architecture and smaller node size translate to better thermal management and sustained performance under load. The G75’s CPU configuration (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) is optimized for a balance of power and efficiency, while the Nothing Phone (1)'s (1x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) leans more heavily on its A78 cores. This means the G75 will likely exhibit less throttling during extended gaming sessions.
Battery Life
The Motorola Moto G75’s endurance rating of 48:58h is a standout feature, significantly exceeding the Nothing Phone (1)’s older 108h rating (converted to similar testing methodology). This translates to multi-day battery life for moderate users. While the Nothing Phone (1) offers 33W wired charging, achieving 50% charge in 30 minutes, the G75’s 30W charging, also reaching 50% in 25 minutes, is comparable. Both support 15W wireless charging, but the G75’s superior battery capacity provides a larger buffer for wireless charging inefficiencies. The G75 also boasts 1000 charge cycles, suggesting a longer lifespan.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Moto G75 if you need exceptional battery endurance – its 48:58h rating is a significant advantage – and a chipset designed for sustained performance. This phone is ideal for users who heavily rely on their devices throughout the day and want a phone that will remain responsive for years. Buy the Nothing Phone (1) if you prioritize a distinctive design, a brighter display with 663 nits of peak brightness, and a more established software ecosystem, even if it means sacrificing some battery life and long-term performance.