Motorola Moto G73 vs Moto G82: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Moto G73 edges out the G82 thanks to its significantly faster Dimensity 930 chipset, offering a smoother overall experience. While the G82 boasts impressive battery life and a bright display, the G73's performance advantage makes it the better pick for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Moto G73 | Motorola Moto G82 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, January 24 | 2022, May 12 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, January 24 | Available. Released 2022, June 07 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 161.4 x 73.8 x 8.3 mm (6.35 x 2.91 x 0.33 in) | 160.9 x 74.5 x 8 mm (6.33 x 2.93 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 181 g (6.38 oz) | 173 g (6.10 oz) |
| Water-resistant design | Water-repellent design | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~85.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~86.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | AMOLED, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 930 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | IMG BXM-8-256 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 13, planned upgrade to Android 14 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1.0µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm, AF | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8 (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio (market/region dependent) |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired | 30W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Lucent White, Midnight Blue | Meteorite Gray, White Lily |
| Models | - | XT2225-1 |
| Price | About 190 EUR | About 290 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 130h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.4 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 380812 (v9) GeekBench: 1977 (v5.1) GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Motorola Moto G73
- Faster Performance (Dimensity 930)
- Slightly better camera processing
- Modern design
- 5G Connectivity
- Slightly dimmer display than G82
- Charging speed could be faster
Motorola Moto G82
- Exceptional Battery Life (130h endurance)
- Bright Display (690 nits)
- Good Value
- 5G Connectivity
- Slower Performance (Snapdragon 695)
- Less powerful chipset for demanding tasks
Display Comparison
The Moto G82 takes a slight lead here. While both phones feature OLED displays, the G82's measured 690 nits peak brightness is noticeably higher than the G73's (estimated around 550-600 nits). The G82 also advertises an 'infinite' contrast ratio, though this is a nominal value. Both offer excellent color accuracy and viewing angles.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable camera systems, but the G73 likely has a slight edge in image processing due to its more powerful chipset. Both feature main sensors around 50MP, and both offer decent video recording capabilities. Low-light performance is likely comparable, though the G73's processing might yield slightly better results. Detailed camera tests would be needed for a definitive answer.
Performance
This is where the Moto G73 shines. The Dimensity 930 chipset is considerably more powerful than the Snapdragon 695 5G found in the G82. Expect faster app loading times, smoother scrolling, and better performance in games. The G73 handles demanding tasks with greater ease.
Battery Life
The Moto G82 is the clear winner in battery life. Its endurance rating of 130 hours is exceptional, suggesting it can easily last two days on a single charge. The G73's battery life is still good, but not as impressive as the G82's.
Buying Guide
The Motorola Moto G73 is ideal for users prioritizing performance and smooth multitasking, especially those who enjoy gaming or demanding apps. The Moto G82 is a great choice for those who value exceptional battery life and a vibrant display, and are less concerned about raw processing power.