Motorola Moto G73 vs Edge 30 Neo: A Head-to-Head Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Edge 30 Neo takes the crown thanks to its significantly faster charging (68W vs 30W), brighter display (1004 nits), and overall more premium feel. While the G73 boasts a slightly more powerful chipset, the Neo's advantages make it the better choice for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Moto G73 | Motorola Edge 30 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 43 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, January 24 | 2022, September 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, January 24 | Available. Released 2022, October 07 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 161.4 x 73.8 x 8.3 mm (6.35 x 2.91 x 0.33 in) | 152.9 x 71.2 x 7.8 mm (6.02 x 2.80 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 181 g (6.38 oz) | 155 g (5.47 oz) |
| Water-resistant design | Splash and dust resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~419 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~85.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.28 inches, 95.2 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | P-OLED, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 930 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | IMG BXM-8-256 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 13, planned upgrade to Android 14 | Android 12, planned upgrade to Android 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1.0µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm, AF | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30/60/120fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired | 68W wired 5W wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4020 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Lucent White, Midnight Blue | Very Peri, Black Onyx, Ice Palace, Aqua Foam |
| Models | - | XT2245-1 |
| Price | About 190 EUR | € 156.44 / $ 185.00 / £ 229.00 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 104h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.4 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 380818 (v9) GeekBench: 1964 (v5.1) GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Motorola Moto G73
- Slightly more powerful chipset
- Good value for money
- Decent camera
- Slower charging (30W)
- Less bright display
- Plastic build
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
- Fast charging (68W, 5W wireless)
- Brighter display (1004 nits)
- Premium design
- Excellent battery life
- Slightly less powerful chipset
- Can be more expensive
Display Comparison
The Edge 30 Neo shines with its impressive 1004 nits peak brightness, making it easily viewable outdoors. The G73's display is good, but lacks the same punch. The Edge 30 Neo's 'Infinite' contrast ratio (though nominal) suggests excellent blacks and vibrant colors. Both use AMOLED panels, so expect rich colors and deep blacks.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable camera systems, but the Edge 30 Neo's camera is generally considered to produce slightly better images, especially in well-lit conditions. The G73's camera is still very good, but may struggle a bit more in low light. Video quality is comparable on both devices.
Performance
The Moto G73's Dimensity 930 generally offers slightly better raw performance than the Edge 30 Neo's Snapdragon 695 5G, particularly in graphics-intensive tasks. However, in everyday use, the difference is often negligible. Both phones handle multitasking and common apps with ease.
Battery Life
The Edge 30 Neo boasts an impressive endurance rating of 104 hours, suggesting excellent battery life. While the G73's battery life is also good, it doesn't quite match the Neo's longevity. The Edge 30 Neo's 68W charging is a game-changer, allowing for incredibly fast top-ups.
Buying Guide
The Motorola Moto G73 is ideal for users prioritizing raw processing power for gaming or demanding apps and who don't mind slower charging. The Motorola Edge 30 Neo is perfect for those who value fast charging, a vibrant display, and a more premium design, even if it means a slight trade-off in pure processing speed.