Motorola Moto G72 vs Samsung Galaxy A34: A Head-to-Head Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A34 edges out the Moto G72 thanks to its superior chipset, slightly better battery life, and Samsung's software ecosystem. While the Moto G72 boasts impressive brightness, the A34 offers a more well-rounded experience for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Moto G72 | Samsung Galaxy A34 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, September 29 | 2023, March 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, October 03 | Available. Released 2023, March 24 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 160.5 x 74.4 x 7.9 mm (6.32 x 2.93 x 0.31 in) | 161.3 x 78.1 x 8.2 mm (6.35 x 3.07 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 166 g (5.86 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| Water-repellent design | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~390 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~86.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 106.9 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | P-OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 6.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 123˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@480fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm | 13 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Meteorite Gray, Polar Blue, Mineral White | Lime, Graphite, Violet, Silver |
| Models | XT2255-1 | SM-A346E, SM-A346B, SM-A346B/DS, SM-A346B/DSN, SM-A346E/DS, SM-A346E/DSN, SM-A346M, SM-A346M/N, SM-A346M/DSN, SM-A3460 |
| Price | About 150 EUR | € 169.99 / $ 175.00 / £ 164.99 / ₹ 23,999 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.55 W/kg (head) 1.49 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 121h | Endurance rating 133h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -26.5 LUFS (Good) | -26.1 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 383317 (v9) GeekBench: 1842 (v5.1) GFXBench: 13fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 472126 (v9) GeekBench: 2316 (v5.5), 2518 (v6) GFXBench: 23fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Motorola Moto G72
- Excellent display brightness
- Clean Android experience
- Faster charging (33W)
- Competitive price
- Less powerful chipset
- Camera performance can be inconsistent
- Shorter software support compared to Samsung
Samsung Galaxy A34
- More powerful processor (Dimensity 1080)
- Longer battery life
- Better camera performance
- Samsung's software ecosystem and support
- Slower charging (25W)
- Can be slightly more expensive
- Samsung's One UI can be polarizing
Display Comparison
Both phones feature vibrant displays with excellent brightness, reaching around 1000 nits. The Moto G72 has a slight edge with 1015 nits, but the difference is minimal in real-world use. Both offer a nominal infinite contrast ratio. The Galaxy A34 typically has better color accuracy and calibration out of the box.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is subjective, but the Galaxy A34 generally delivers more consistent and reliable results. Samsung's image processing is well-regarded, and the A34 often captures more detail and dynamic range. The Moto G72's camera is capable, but can sometimes struggle in challenging lighting conditions. Both offer decent video recording capabilities.
Performance
The Samsung Galaxy A34's Dimensity 1080 chipset provides a noticeable performance boost over the Moto G72's Helio G99. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the A34. The A34's Cortex-A78 cores offer a significant advantage.
Battery Life
The Galaxy A34 secures a win in battery life with an endurance rating of 133 hours compared to the Moto G72's 121 hours. While both offer all-day battery life for moderate users, the A34 provides a bit more breathing room. However, the Moto G72 charges faster with 33W wired charging versus the A34's 25W.
Buying Guide
The Motorola Moto G72 is a great choice for budget-conscious buyers who prioritize display brightness and a clean Android experience. The Samsung Galaxy A34 is ideal for those seeking a more powerful processor, longer software support, and a more polished overall user experience, even if it means a slightly slower charging speed.