Motorola's G-series consistently delivers excellent value, and the Moto G71s and G71 5G are no exception. Both offer 5G connectivity and a smooth experience, but subtle differences can make a big impact on your decision. Let's dive into a head-to-head comparison to help you choose the right one.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Moto G71s edges out the G71 5G primarily due to its slightly faster charging capabilities. Both phones share the same core processor and display, making the charging speed the deciding factor for most users seeking a reliable and affordable 5G smartphone. The G71 5G remains a strong contender, especially if price is a major concern.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat15 800/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | 1, 3, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - PRC |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 17 | 2021, November 18 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, June 20 | Available. Released 2022, January 19 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | - |
| Dimensions | 160.9 x 74.5 x 8 mm (6.33 x 2.93 x 0.31 in) | 161.2 x 73.9 x 8.5 mm (6.35 x 2.91 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 173 g (6.10 oz) | 179 g (6.31 oz) |
| | Water-repellent design | Water-repellent design |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2440 pixels (~404 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 104.0 cm2 (~86.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~83.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz | AMOLED |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8 (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 121˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2, 17mm (ultrawide), 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 30W / 33W wired, 50% in 30 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, White | Neptune Green, Arctic Blue, Iron Black |
| Models | - | XT2169-1, XT2169-2 |
| Price | About 240 EUR | About 110 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.03 W/kg (head) 1.16 W/kg (body) |
Motorola Moto G71s
- Faster Charging (33W)
- Slightly more premium feel (potentially)
- Good AMOLED display
- Potentially higher price than G71 5G
- 60Hz refresh rate
Motorola Moto G71 5G
- More affordable
- Good AMOLED display
- Decent battery life
- Slower charging (potentially)
- 60Hz refresh rate
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 6.4-inch AMOLED display with a 60Hz refresh rate and FHD+ resolution. While the quality is excellent for the price point, the lack of a higher refresh rate might disappoint some users. Color accuracy and brightness are comparable on both devices.
Camera Comparison
The Moto G71s and G71 5G both boast a triple-camera system, typically including a 50MP main sensor, an 8MP ultrawide lens, and a 2MP macro lens. Image quality is generally good in well-lit conditions, but low-light performance can be a bit noisy. Video recording capabilities are similar on both devices, supporting up to 1080p resolution.
Performance
Powered by the same Snapdragon 695 5G chipset, performance is virtually identical between the two phones. Expect smooth multitasking and responsive app usage for everyday tasks. Gaming performance is decent, but don't expect flagship-level speeds. The 6GB or 8GB of RAM (depending on the variant) helps keep things running smoothly.
Battery Life
The Moto G71s offers 33W wired charging, while the Moto G71 5G supports 30W/33W wired charging (with a claimed 50% charge in 30 minutes). While both support 33W, the G71 5G's marketing highlights the faster charging time, though real-world results may vary. Both phones typically house a 5000mAh battery, providing all-day battery life with moderate usage.
Buying Guide
The Motorola Moto G71s is ideal for users who prioritize faster charging and don't mind spending a bit more. The Motorola Moto G71 5G is a great choice for budget-conscious buyers who still want 5G connectivity and a solid overall experience, accepting slightly slower charging.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Snapdragon 695 5G a good processor?
Yes, the Snapdragon 695 5G is a capable mid-range processor that provides smooth performance for everyday tasks and moderate gaming. It's a solid choice for a budget 5G phone.
❓ What is the difference in camera quality between the two phones?
The camera hardware is largely the same, so image quality will be very similar. Minor differences in software processing might exist, but overall, expect comparable results.
